Hi all,
I got a new guitar for Xmas , and i was wondering if the guitar gurus around could enlighten me a bit.
As you remember in November i got a Squier Fat strat with a fender 15W amp. Nice combo for me to start with.
Then back home for xmas i got an Epiphone SG G400 limited edition with pearl pickguards etc, along with a Marshall 15W amp.
The second combo was simply awesome ... great depth and bass tone, for the rock i play. I am stunned by this.
So the question is. All i want from a guitar is depth and clarity both on clean and overdriven channels. Meaning i want a clear distorted sound, deep with punch but not fuzzy (i dont know if i express this correctly), but this is my main wish from the guitar.
So i am wondering, if the SG i got from Epi, is worth equiping with Seymour Duncan pups in order to get closer to this tone i want, or if i should leave the guitar alone and get a "real" Gibson SG or LP.
Is it all done for the name in the headstock? Many shops (that sell gibsons) or Gibson owners tell me to go for a gibson. Is that true or the epiphone is worth keeping as my only main guitar?
My gripe with gibbos is that they have nitrocellulose lacquer and this as far as i can understand is veeeery fragile in comparison to polyurethane lacquer that is used on Fenders (and epiphones). This info is from others, but there is a big split in the lacquer opinions.
PS. The squier/fender combo is veeery fuzzy when i play with the bridge hum pup in comparison with the epi/marshall on bridge hum pup. And when i say fuzzyness on the distorted tone, i mean that no matter how well you fret, it will sound not well defined as if you didnt know how to fret correctly or you lacked skill.
Thanks in advance
I got a new guitar for Xmas , and i was wondering if the guitar gurus around could enlighten me a bit.
As you remember in November i got a Squier Fat strat with a fender 15W amp. Nice combo for me to start with.
Then back home for xmas i got an Epiphone SG G400 limited edition with pearl pickguards etc, along with a Marshall 15W amp.
The second combo was simply awesome ... great depth and bass tone, for the rock i play. I am stunned by this.
So the question is. All i want from a guitar is depth and clarity both on clean and overdriven channels. Meaning i want a clear distorted sound, deep with punch but not fuzzy (i dont know if i express this correctly), but this is my main wish from the guitar.
So i am wondering, if the SG i got from Epi, is worth equiping with Seymour Duncan pups in order to get closer to this tone i want, or if i should leave the guitar alone and get a "real" Gibson SG or LP.
Is it all done for the name in the headstock? Many shops (that sell gibsons) or Gibson owners tell me to go for a gibson. Is that true or the epiphone is worth keeping as my only main guitar?
My gripe with gibbos is that they have nitrocellulose lacquer and this as far as i can understand is veeeery fragile in comparison to polyurethane lacquer that is used on Fenders (and epiphones). This info is from others, but there is a big split in the lacquer opinions.
PS. The squier/fender combo is veeery fuzzy when i play with the bridge hum pup in comparison with the epi/marshall on bridge hum pup. And when i say fuzzyness on the distorted tone, i mean that no matter how well you fret, it will sound not well defined as if you didnt know how to fret correctly or you lacked skill.
Thanks in advance