what have they done wrong?I sure hope the Oregon measure passes. It seems to me like they've really been paying attention to the mistakes both CO and WA have made. It could be the model system for other states in the next couple years.
what have they done wrong?I sure hope the Oregon measure passes. It seems to me like they've really been paying attention to the mistakes both CO and WA have made. It could be the model system for other states in the next couple years.
In short, WA seems to have made the process to open and run a shop pretty onerous. CO way overplayed it's hand on taxation and has, if anything, made black market selling even more lucrative as a result.what have they done wrong?
i have heard that people are still going to their dealers in CO because of price in stores...if i was them, id be fine with buying it legally(!!) in a store...more variety, better quality...that is, unless pricing is bananasIn short, WA seems to have made the process to open and run a shop pretty onerous. CO way overplayed it's hand on taxation and has, if anything, made black market selling even more lucrative as a result.
My understanding, is that pricing is bananas. That said, it does seem that a lot of people are buying legit, though I think that most of these people are people who weren't smoking before it became "legal", or were perhaps just very infrequent smokers. It seems that anyone who was any kind of regular smoker before legalization has stuck with their old hookups, largely because of price. IMO, I think if CO cut the tax rate in half, it would but a huge dent in the black market. I said it earlier somewhere in this thread, but this may be one of the very few instances were the laffer curve might actually represent reality.i have heard that people are still going to their dealers in CO because of price in stores...if i was them, id be fine with buying it legally(!!) in a store...more variety, better quality...that is, unless pricing is bananas
This is where the Oregon measure looks really good. Because of the quantity the state is well aware exists, they plan to undercut the street price including taxes so the incentive is to go to the store.i have heard that people are still going to their dealers in CO because of price in stores...if i was them, id be fine with buying it legally(!!) in a store...more variety, better quality...that is, unless pricing is bananas
In one of the most hotly debated measures on the ballot in Oregon, voters made a decision on the legalization of marijuana.
Measure 91 has passed, according to Fox 12 political analyst Tim Hibbitts.
The passage of Measure 91 means that starting July 1, 2015, adults over 21 years old will be able to possess up to 8 ounces of marijuana at home, according to the Oregon Voter's Guide, but only one ounce away from home.
http://www.npr.org/2014/11/06/361942901/d-c-s-marijuana-vote-faces-congressional-reviewsince DC just legalized recreational weed, how does congress have the authority to veto the bill that passed?
that didnt answer my question though. it basically just told me that legalized pcp might be next
That's the conservative solution of course, but what would be the liberal solution ? Possibly to remove Twinkies from all public schools as to not attract the potheads and to reduce childhood obesity rates.If only they could use that money to arm teachers to protect the kids from crazy potheads.
i guess you slept through michelle o's fantastic school lunch program?Possibly to remove Twinkies from all public schools to reduce childhood obesity rates.
I was just going to post it.I laughed so hard at this.
I don't feel as high to me as they look to me
Police said the detectives, while conducting a narcotics investigation, discovered the ad on Craigslist
I kinda thought that was the point. If Oregon prices and taxes like they claim, it will undercut the black market as well.
It also contains this. We may need a Syadasti irony ruling.Fucking brilliant congress. Correct me if I am wrong but this measure essentially legalizes possession but leaves the supply chain in the hands of criminals. As seen in Wa and Co, illegal supplies are probably cheaper. This will basically provide a more plentiful uncontrolled untaxed supply in place. Reaping none of the benefits of legalization while increasing many of the negative impacts of marijuana.
Legislation based on ideology, not common sense or what is best for the actual people. How many of these morons spew on about Democracy, Freedumb, libertarianism, reduced intrusion from the federal government?
U.S. spending bill bans funds to legalize marijuana in Washington, DC
Lets see what the local to me Rez has to say about this,
Officer Joe Avila picked up four to five pounds of marijuana from a UPS store as part of an investigation in November of last year, The Contra Costa Times reports. But instead of filing a report and taking the evidence to the police station, as required, Avila just took the drugs home.
Evidence not black enough?"Avila told investigators that he used two pounds of the marijuana to train his police dog in February 2014, and when pressed, he acknowledged there may be more in the trunk of his K-9 patrol car or at his house," The Times reports.
Amazingly, officials at the Richmond Police Department said Avila probably won't be charged with any crime, citing evidence too weak to produce a conviction.
Two neighboring states are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to strike down Colorado's laws legalizing recreational marijuana.
The Colorado attorney general's office says the states of Nebraska and Oklahoma have filed the lawsuit directly with the nation's highest court. The attorney general's office says the lawsuit alleges "that Colorado's Amendment 64 and its implementing legislation regarding recreational marijuana is unconstitutional under the Supremacy Clause of the U.S. Constitution."
Colorado Attorney General John Suthers said in a statement that he will defend the state's legalization of marijuana.
"Because neighboring states have expressed concern about Colorado-grown marijuana coming into their states, we are not entirely surprised by this action," Suthers said. "However, it appears the plaintiffs' primary grievance stems from non-enforcement of federal laws regarding marijuana, as opposed to choices made by the voters of Colorado. We believe this suit is without merit and we will vigorously defend against it in the U.S. Supreme Court."