Issue 2 in favor of building a plane: Certification
In the post above I quoted a brief definition of what a Light Sport Aircraft is. Similarly, there's a definition for true ultralights, as per FAR 103 (paraphrased):
Most fixed wing ultralights appear to be a bundle of sticks + a wing + a Rotax, or "half a VW" in this particular case
Why do people even try to meet these stringent requirements? The answer is that 103-complaint ultralights don't require inspection, registration (no N-numbers), or even mandatory pilot training (!). The latter implies that a flight physical isn't needed to fly an ultralight, so people with chronic diseases that have disqualified them from flying "real" planes sometimes step down to ultralights to skirt the rules/Fight The Man.
While the true ultralight category represents a unique, libertarian-paradise niche carved out from the sky, I don't think it's for me. I want to be trained and licensed in order to do things properly (and not die by virtue of my own incompetence!), and my wife agrees fully with me on this point, unsurprisingly. I also guess that I'll want something with a windshield, based on my motorcycle/scooter experience, for lower wind noise.
Add in a windshield and anything but the smallest of engines and FAR 103 compliance is unattainable by the dry-weight criterion. Given that I'll get a license of some sort if I do this, then what other options might exist? See the next post…
In the post above I quoted a brief definition of what a Light Sport Aircraft is. Similarly, there's a definition for true ultralights, as per FAR 103 (paraphrased):
This definition is pretty restrictive, in other words. The empty weight and maximum airspeed constraints are apparently the most difficult to meet.Federal Air Regulation 103 said:- Solo pilot, for sport or recreational purposes
- Empty weight < 254 lbs
- <= 5 gallon fuel capacity
- <= 55 knot full power level flight maximum airspeed
- Stall speed <= 24 kts
Most fixed wing ultralights appear to be a bundle of sticks + a wing + a Rotax, or "half a VW" in this particular case
Why do people even try to meet these stringent requirements? The answer is that 103-complaint ultralights don't require inspection, registration (no N-numbers), or even mandatory pilot training (!). The latter implies that a flight physical isn't needed to fly an ultralight, so people with chronic diseases that have disqualified them from flying "real" planes sometimes step down to ultralights to skirt the rules/Fight The Man.
While the true ultralight category represents a unique, libertarian-paradise niche carved out from the sky, I don't think it's for me. I want to be trained and licensed in order to do things properly (and not die by virtue of my own incompetence!), and my wife agrees fully with me on this point, unsurprisingly. I also guess that I'll want something with a windshield, based on my motorcycle/scooter experience, for lower wind noise.
Add in a windshield and anything but the smallest of engines and FAR 103 compliance is unattainable by the dry-weight criterion. Given that I'll get a license of some sort if I do this, then what other options might exist? See the next post…
Last edited: