No? DPReview disagreescanon's not shaking in their boots.![]()
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/44c0a/44c0a9a8e73d2f367eb025e887b76aea93318f14" alt="Monkeydance :monkeydance: :monkeydance:"
Its big problem was the fact that Canon was still a generation ahead in the noise stakes, managing to consistently deliver clean images despite megapixel jumps. With the advent of the D300 however Nikon has conclusively removed this disparity and if anything stepped ahead of Canon
The D300 is definitely a stop better than the previous generation Nikons and any disparity in a comparison between this and the 40D is at a pixel-peeping level - at least from what I've seen. Not that there's necessarily anything wrong with pixel peeping, but I'd say, in regards to real world results from cropped sensors, the playing field has been decisively leveled. Good things for the consumers, Canon has to again step up, and then Nikon can do the sameAt ISO 800 the DSLR-A700 begins to exhibit some chroma (blotchy color) noise, the cleanest of the remaining three appears to be the D300 followed by the EOS 40D
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1c3f3/1c3f34f004ccd1b20a5f00dc96b6d91b315cf048" alt="Biggrin :D :D"