Put it on your RMSS list!I am now confused, is anyone else going to buy one or just trash talk it?
Reminds me of ball style steering in a performance car. Very numb feeling even if its "better" than Rack and Pinion. You need some feedback to what the tires are doing to react in time.This has actually been my experience with linkage forks on scooters. I used to ride a Vespa and then some high-end Hondas (for a scooter) back in the day, and the vagueness I experienced in handling/feeling on flat corners is the thing I remember the most about this type of front suspension. And it certainly isn't inviting me to test this thing.
if it's bladder instead of IFP then you could still end up w/ less friction overall due to the smaller shafts. I don't know if they've mentioned either way. I do agree that smaller air volume + smaller oil volume = higher temps, less consistent etc. The higher air volume in the fatbike tires will make up for it though2 air springs will yield double the amount of friction and that even before considering the pressure needed which is around double of a traditional sliding fork.
Wondering if this is the same kind of feeling I had going from a rigid fork to 100mm fork. Everything felt vague... for about a week, then things felt amazing.Reminds me of ball style steering in a performance car. Very numb feeling even if its "better" than Rack and Pinion. You need some feedback to what the tires are doing to react in time.
According to the PB piece, it's a tru-shaft design.if it's bladder instead of IFP then you could still end up w/ less friction overall due to the smaller shafts.
hurry up and get one already so we can all laugh at you...Wondering if this is the same kind of feeling I had going from a rigid fork to 100mm fork. Everything felt vague... for about a week, then things felt amazing.
I had the exact same feeling. But it only took one ride.Wondering if this is the same kind of feeling I had going from a rigid fork to 100mm fork. Everything felt vague... for about a week, then things felt amazing.
Initial ride impressions starting to roll in - https://cyclingtips.com/2018/10/trust-performance-message-fork-review/
Wait for the vital review.About time! when I want to know how bike parts handle rowdy as fuck descending where a crash could literally be fatal in nasty rocks and roots, I wait until cycling tips has weighed in.
I didn't even click that. Is it good?
Better than I expected, although I didn't exactly have high expectations either.About time! when I want to know how bike parts handle rowdy as fuck descending where a crash could literally be fatal in nasty rocks and roots, I wait until cycling tips has weighed in.
I didn't even click that. Is it good?
Shots fired.oh yeah cuz those are WAY better
Dude I JUST wrote something for them in 2013. Let me breathe a little here.Shots fired.
Guess I'll wait for the blister gear review. Will be waiting a while...
Time to stop with the linkage shitposting. I get that you are mad we called you out, but don't you think it's funny that you shat all over the analysis we gave and then the practical review from vital lines up pretty well with all the comments given? Especially every comment about falling rates and all that nonsense? I get that you don't like that it's carried out that way. Tough titties, it's proven to be R E L A T I V E L Y accurate, and until designers release their notes and design goals (they won't) it's the best we have. Don't me mad when it's slightly inaccurate or when the math lines up with what the rider feels.On the other hand I NEED CURVES!!!!!. I can throw up a random rear suspension linkage and get 20 guys to photoshop a pic and give me results, but not one of this fork???
I want to see the rearward, curving upward axle path and see how close it is to the famous Girvin J path....
He shaves his legs, I trust his message.
Hahahaaha. No, I'm really serious. I would like to see what this does. But I don't own linkage (software), nor do I really have time.Empty quote? Just marking this for posterity so you can poke fun later
Time to stop with the linkage shitposting. I get that you are mad we called you out, but don't you think it's funny that you shat all over the analysis we gave and then the practical review from vital lines up pretty well with all the comments given? Especially every comment about falling rates and all that nonsense? I get that you don't like that it's carried out that way. Tough titties, it's proven to be R E L A T I V E L Y accurate, and until designers release their notes and design goals (they won't) it's the best we have. Don't me mad when it's slightly inaccurate or when the math lines up with what the rider feels.
Just put it in reverse and leave out the chain. Anti Squat =anti dive.So I just opened my copy of Linkage....no option to model a linkage fork. Just single crown or double crown in usd or none usd.
We'll need to bust out some CAD or old school pencil n paper it.
there's no option to remove the chain in linkage, just look at the Anti-Rise ( = Anti-Dive)Just put it in reverse and leave out the chain. Anti Squat =anti dive.
I brought up free body diagrams in the past and people thought I was talking about porn.......
I have never fired up the program.there's no option to remove the chain in linkage, just look at the Anti-Rise ( = Anti-Dive)
but basically, you are agreeing that Linkage can spit out the curves I am asking about?there's no option to remove the chain in linkage, just look at the Anti-Rise ( = Anti-Dive)
Definitely.but basically, you are agreeing that Linkage can spit out the curves I am asking about?
ya cool.Definitely.
Anti-Dive ( = Anti-Rise)
Leverage Ratio is the same as with a rear suspension, although it's difficult to see how the 'shock' is mounted internally.
Mechanical Trail can't be plotted directly, but can be interpreted from the axle path plot.
Now you're just trying to get viruses and shit into my multiverseWhile we are in the subject of useful software, has anyone had any experience with Restakor?
What about it?While we are in the subject of useful software, has anyone had any experience with Restakor?
When it's $699 on jenson.com
even after 100 times, that one never gets old...Trust marketing took inspiration from Chrysler: