That pic makes it look like a 50 degree HTAMeanwhile in Montreal, a guy is working on a linkage fork with a fox spring/damper:
https://www.instagram.com/p/By78DPqlKgM/
That pic makes it look like a 50 degree HTAMeanwhile in Montreal, a guy is working on a linkage fork with a fox spring/damper:
https://www.instagram.com/p/By78DPqlKgM/
I thought so to. A very organized response. Almost as if...........................The comments section of the PB article was strange. Lots of 'influencers' and interaction.
wow sure sounds like you have a lack of TrustI thought so to. A very organized response. Almost as if...........................
trust then verify??? Wait...verify then trust??wow sure sounds like you have a lack of Trust
This is why we need @Sandwich to hire and review the fork. Objective review from a journeyman for the rest of us.trust then verify??? Wait...verify then trust??
The whole thing seems pretty weird. The big hype in the beginning. The long wait for a review that.....I have to say, I would not like if it was for my product..
When was the last time there was so much hype? With such disappointing or at least disparate reviews?
Sorry. it shouldn't be "it's the best thing ever, unless you hate it"
Trust the Kranked bro. We gettin shirts.shirts have kinda fizzled?
They won't even let me install it. And I'm pretty sure it was my alien wrench (fox 36 topcap doodad)He'll just smack it with an allen wrench and break it.
FTFYAnother failed EUR fork (is there another thread for these?)
maybe you should try reading again. only the rebound knob was 3d printedThe only thing I like less than a USD fork for a Mtb is a homemade, 3D-printed, blue ano USD fork for a MTB.
Does it have a torsional rebound knob, too?maybe you should try reading again. only the rebound knob was 3d printed
maybe you should try reading again. only the rebound knob was 3d printed
Come on, really?Oh I know.
Home-CNC'd or home-printed, either way we don't need this.
Reach looks pretty good. Nice, upright seat tube angle, too. Just might be hard to steer or not pummel one's crotch what with the lack of any provision for the feet.Come on, really?
You no like innovation, outside the box thinking, or just weird nutters going "what if"?
With out people playing in their garages we would still be riding this
View attachment 135870
But, as you can clearly see, the lizards have been with us from the beginning.
Come on, really?
You no like innovation, outside the box thinking, or just weird nutters going "what if"?
With out people playing in their garages we would still be riding this
View attachment 135870
But, as you can clearly see, the lizards have been with us from the beginning.
Where did you get the numbers from? How do the Boxxer and Dorado stack up?Not all USD forks are created equally. I don't have the numbers for dual crowns but the Intend Edge is 17,3 Nm/° in torsional stiffness while the CRconception Fore (http://www.crconception.com/FORE-SC/) is 37,7Nm/°.
For reference a Pike is 35,3 and the trusty Fox 36 is 25,3Nm/°. The Lyrik/Yari is 38,6Nm/°.
CRconception forks have bushings at the bottom of the upper legs and at the top of the stanchions/lower legs, see animation in the link above. This and probably other things increases the torsional rigidity.
Disclaimer: some people might be upset by the numbers for the Fox 36. The numbers are for a 160mm 15mm axle fork around 2-3 years ago. There is very little room for error of measurement since several models yield the same kind of results over the year and similar numbers can be found from Fox themselves (I just don't know where).
There is just quite a difference between measured and perceived torsional stiffness. I have ridden the same bike with both a 36 and a Yari and would say that the 36 is just a tiny bit stiffer than the Yari. There is a long way between the front tire contact patch and your hands on the handlebars so that the torsional stiffness of the fork alone, once above a certain level, might not be the most important property. The damping and spring curves are quite likely to blur our perception of torsional stiffness.
You just have to trust him.Where did you get the numbers from? How do the Boxxer and Dorado stack up?
The numbers are from the guy behind CRconception and from a German online article: https://www.bike-magazin.de/komponenten/federgabeln_daempfer/test-2017-enduro-mtb-federgabeln/a37289-page3.htmlWhere did you get the numbers from? How do the Boxxer and Dorado stack up?
wrong thread. missing link discussion is over here...The numbers are from the guy behind CRconception and from a German online article: https://www.bike-magazin.de/komponenten/federgabeln_daempfer/test-2017-enduro-mtb-federgabeln/a37289-page3.html
I have seen numbers for the Dorado and Boxxer, also on a German site, but they were measures around 10 years ago, if I remember correctly. I cannot find a link at the moment... maybe somebody here has it?
Paralellogram-driven lefty. You heard it here first.trust was dropping some vagueish posts over the weekend, seeming to imply that something new is pending launch
they posted a teaser video, comments seem to think it's gonna be a longer travel enduro versionParalellogram-driven lefty. You heard it here first.
It will also work for XC bikes too, because science something.they posted a teaser video, comments seem to think it's gonna be a longer travel enduro version
Two weeks....after the new tshirt is launched.trust was dropping some vagueish posts over the weekend, seeming to imply that something new is pending launch
That's not very Trust(ing) of you.I will try the long travel version... if there is a 100% money back guarantee somehow involved.