I am glad D. Turner took a stand and basically told TE to go **** himself. I am sure the bikes will remain amazing as usual and I'll keep buying them for one.
yeah, honestly i think the industry could use less ellsworths and more turners...I think you get value for your dollar with turner, and nice graphics with ellsworthless.
I've been torn about this whole thing. The XC bikes won't matter, but I have no interest in a 6" travel bike from turner anymore. I'm sure that, if anybody, Turner can do the 4bar right, but I already know I'm not a fan, so I'm not gonna waste my time. I'd buy a six pot or RFX though.
Of course, there's the lawill patent, which nobody is using, and I know works....
That is what I had heard. Horst sold the patents to Specialized b/c Specialized wanted to continue to use the design and both parties were sick of it being illegally copied. GT dropped FSR after S started to enforce the patent b/c they couldn't exactly go around making frames with one of their chief rivals stickers on it. It wasn't about the $ so much as recognition/ not being ripped off.
It's true that patent protection is often about preventing copycat designs as much as it is about making money. But honestly, given how tight margins are in the bike industry, $14 per frame is nothing to sneeze at. Multiply that by the number of frames and it adds up pretty quick, especially for a relatively small company. Plus specialized gets non-cash benefits in the form of customer recognition, etc.
Let's say Turner sells 1,200 frames per year excluding the DHR, that's almsot $17,000 in royalties that go off to the big ugly S. That's half of somebody's salary. $14 per frame doesn't sound like that much until you start adding it up.
Let's say Turner sells 1,200 frames per year excluding the DHR, that's almsot $17,000 in royalties that go off to the big ugly S. That's half of somebody's salary. $14 per frame doesn't sound like that much until you start adding it up.
Let's say Turner sells 1,200 frames per year excluding the DHR, that's almsot $17,000 in royalties that go off to the big ugly S. That's half of somebody's salary. $14 per frame doesn't sound like that much until you start adding it up.
Raise the price of a bike $14, would anyone even blink? Or even the price of a shock, or spring, for that matter...
Of course, who knows how much the Ells royalties were? In the end, it probably wasn't about the money. But a lot of crow to eat when you admit you can't tell the difference between chainstay and seatstay links. And that the location of the link was just about keeping derailleur slap to a minimum.
Raise the price of a bike $14, would anyone even blink? Or even the price of a shock, or spring, for that matter...
Of course, who knows how much the Ells royalties were? In the end, it probably wasn't about the money. But a lot of crow to eat when you admit you can't tell the difference between chainstay and seatstay links. And that the location of the link was just about keeping derailleur slap to a minimum.
That's not really the point, now they can raise the price of the bike $14 or drop it $14 or do whatever they want and don't have to write a check to another bike company. I'm not saying I have some sort of inside knowledge as to what exactly happened, but if I owned a boutique frame company, I would rather not have to send money to another competing mfg every month because of the location of my pivots.
Yeah, what James said. And better to eat crow now and move forward independently than to keep paying fees and be subject to license agreement restrictions.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.