Perhaps, with your clearly evident expertise, you should seek a position in the industry and save us ignorant taxpayers some money.I hear what you guys are saying, but it sounds like that it's a failed computer... just swap it out.
Also, if they can't fix any satellite at any orbit, then how can we even dream of a station on Mars or one of the moons here, Saturn or Jupiter?
I call shennanigans and claim that they could fix this satellite, but would rather use it for target practice. Which is perfectly fine by me if that's that case as we need to continue improving military technology.
A laser would get diffused by the atmosphere so it wouldn't do anything. I bet we have spy satellites with weapons on them - the Russians have had and tested them in space. We just want to test the terrestrial systems like the Chinese did.What about that super powerful laser that someone posted about? Couldn't they target the fuel tanks with that. Even if it's only a femto-second (?) burst, it's like 300 gigawatts... shouldn't that blow it up?
Plus, how cool would that be?
In addition to reconnaissance equipment, the Almaz had an on-board cannon derived from the 23mm Nudelmann aircraft cannon (other sources say it was a Nudelmann NR-30 30mm gun). Salyut 3 conducted a successful test firing on a target satellite. OPS-4 featured two unguided missiles instead of the aircraft cannon.
3rd? Lemme tell you, there were four. There had to be a shooter for every one of JFK's testicles.Dan, are you saying there was a third shooter?
Idea = Common sense. US Govt. = QuestionableCouple questions:
1. How come they don't send satellites with a self-destruct option?
2. If the boat launched missles miss, then that's a waste, so why not put a manual guidance system with a small fuel supply (to navigate in space) on a missle so they can pull right up to the satellite and then manually detonate?
Maybe we could see it. They should do it at night. Pure entertainmentDan, are you saying there was a third shooter?
What about that super powerful laser that someone posted about? Couldn't they target the fuel tanks with that. Even if it's only a femto-second (?) burst, it's like 300 gigawatts... shouldn't that blow it up?
Plus, how cool would that be?
American tax dollars hard at work!!....D
I'm more aware of what happens than most people.As far as the "games" being played with bogus test results and poor reporting, it's all just politics and only one of the reasons I'm no longer working in the defense machine.
As far as the "games" being played with bogus test results and poor reporting, it's all just politics and only one of the reasons I'm no longer working in the defense machine.
I was "Special Projects" Everything was shredded to the consistency of talcum powder, and then re-bagged and burned, regardless of the supposed classification level.
I used to work for the DoD in the DLA , and it is amazing how some stuff that would be wide open in basic "for Official Use Only" That had been like that for years , would suddenly Become "Classified " Or "Secret " or even "Wet Shred" when Something happened.
I knew our General was power mad when he realigned every program into one system so he could move money around as he saw fit and still adhere to Federal Acquisition Regulation. To top it off, he then classified the budget as Top Secret.I used to work for the DoD in the DLA , and it is amazing how some stuff that would be wide open in basic "for Official Use Only" That had been like that for years , would suddenly Become "Classified " Or "Secret " or even "Wet Shred" when Something happened.
Navy gunners in the Pacific were watching the sea and sky Wednesday, waiting for perfect conditions to take a kill shot on an errant satellite 150 miles above them.
They have just a 10-second window to fire, a Pentagon official said, and may not be able to take their shot on their first opportunity at 10:30 p.m. ET Wednesday.
"It's not enough to say 'no,' but we're watching the weather," the official told reporters at the Pentagon. "It's on the margin."
The cruiser USS Lake Erie will get one 10-second window each of the next nine or 10 days to fire an interceptor missile that will destroy the faltering spy satellite before it can tumble to Earth and -- possibly -- release a cloud of toxic gas.
The Pentagon said the window of opportunity to strike the 5,000-pound satellite opened Wednesday, when the space shuttle Atlantis landed in Florida. The Pentagon wanted to be sure the shuttle would not be struck by any debris from a destroyed satellite.
Hey who let Cheney in here!...WTF grab him....DTonight's also a lunar eclipse, so I hope they don't accidentally shoot the moon.
man, you KNOW he's gonna be touching himself tonight.Hey who let Cheney in here!...WTF grab him....D
So did they really shoot it down with the SM-3 or did they take it out with another satellite after a missHe shoots, he scores!!
They're pretty impressive. BikeGeek FTW for predicting it'd work.He shoots, he scores!!
http://www.cnn.com/2008/TECH/space/02/21/satellite.shootdown/index.html
I want to see explosion pics.
No. The biggest reason they did it was because it showed the rest of the world that we are the US and we can shoot sh!t out of the sky . The top secret imaging thing is just another excuse that the government was telling people so they wouldnt think that billions of dollars werent being spent on pyrotechnics. The sensor would have been incinerated on reentry. The real reason was just to chow Americas fire power. "We have big missiles we can shoot out of orbit to blow up fast moving objects... Do you?"According to a few news networks yesterday, it isn't the fuel that's really the issue, although it is frozen and WOULD survive re-entry. It reacts like chlorine gas in the human respiratory system.
The big deal is the top secret imaging sensor on board. It is one of the new classified ones that is something like 4x more sensitive than the ones on a keyhole bird.
This could be the case as last year the chinese also developed a missile that could shoot a satilite down. Since then AMOS and others have been busy tracking the inventory of our satilites and probably making sure our capabilities are still there.No. The biggest reason they did it was because it showed the rest of the world that we are the US and we can shoot sh!t out of the sky . The top secret imaging thing is just another excuse that the government was telling people so they wouldnt think that billions of dollars werent being spent on pyrotechnics. The sensor would have been incinerated on reentry. The real reason was just to chow Americas fire power. "We have big missiles we can shoot out of orbit to blow up fast moving objects... Do you?"