there is perfectly good reason for dc"s a on hardtails. anyone whose ridden lynn woods knows. but where talking an oblivious jackass who gives a......................
Those little sentences are so friggin' retarded! That reminds me of the one from March or April 2003 where it says something like, "He needed a bike that could drop off cliffs between races, and costs less than $3500. RC nailed it by suggesting..."Originally posted by slowride
"Along came a Spider: Looking for a cross-country bike that climbs well and can handle all-day epic rides? R.C. cuts through all the hype and comes up with the right bike."
Originally posted by Pip3r
firth was the best thing that mag ever had [/B]
or eihter that get more opinions from making a post on rideOriginally posted by Tully
What is the point of e-mailing Ask RC and waiting a long time to possibly get his semi-worthless opinion, when you could just call your favorite bike shop and get an instant reply?
Dear Mr. Cunningham
I have bought your pubilcation here i Oslo, Norway several times, although it costs about 10$. Now, I'm really curious about one thing
In your February 2002 issue you test the Turner XCE:
The byline reads R.Cunningham, and one note on "Descending" is: "The rear wheel tracks the ground, even if the rear tire is skidding, which redefines the concept of late braking into corners".
Then, comes December 2003 you test the Turner 5-spot:
This time there is no byline, but the same note on "Descending": "The rear wheel tracks the ground, even if the rear tire is skidding, which redefines the concept of late braking into corners".
Exactly the same scentence!
Another recycled phraze is "The [name of bike]'s [deg.] head angle is purposely on the slack side to add stability in technical situations, and to keep the Turner's steering predictable at higher speeds. Both attributes are clearly evident and give the Turner pilot a "bring it on" attitude when rock drops or sketchy chutes loom ahead".
There are other striking similarities as well.
In the XCE article, you refer to the Burner, which the XCE succeded (briefly). In the 5-spot article, a similar note on the RFX appears.
My question?
1) Who wrote the test of the Turner 5-spot?
2) Who approved the article?
3) If a forigner who buys the magazine infrequently can spot the similarities, why could none of the editors?
4) Why has the XCE test disappeared from the website?
5) Will you print this letter and a plausible explenation? Will you reply to this e-mail and tell me which issue the reply will be printed in? It's difficult to get hold of the magazine here...
Sincerely,
Arve Søreide
Oslo
Norway
Because if you live where I live and ask the LBS guys q's, you would, 9 out of 10 times, be walking out with a King headset, santa cruz frame, raceface northshore dh crankset, and the most expensive helmet on the face of the earth, no matter what your budget is.Originally posted by Tully
What is the point of e-mailing Ask RC and waiting a long time to possibly get his semi-worthless opinion, when you could just call your favorite bike shop and get an instant reply?
Yeah, there's also a shop like that near my house. Fortunately, I've gotten savvy enough (and poor enough) that I never completely trust the guy who works there.Originally posted by nicklin
Because if you live where I live and ask the LBS guys q's, you would, 9 out of 10 times, be walking out with a King headset, santa cruz frame, raceface northshore dh crankset, and the most expensive helmet on the face of the earth, no matter what your budget is.
consider it doneOriginally posted by Tully
Yeah, there's also a shop like that near my house. Fortunately, I've gotten savvy enough (and poor enough) that I never completely trust the guy who works there.
By the way, you ought to cite For Whom the Bell Tolls (Metallica) for the quote in your signature thingy.
So it's better to write and get a crackpot answer based on whimsy and whatever product is advertising most in MBA that month, instead of advice based on personal experience of the shop guys?Originally posted by nicklin
Because if you live where I live and ask the LBS guys q's, you would, 9 out of 10 times, be walking out with a King headset, santa cruz frame, raceface northshore dh crankset, and the most expensive helmet on the face of the earth, no matter what your budget is.
If by personal experience you mean a bumch of 15 year-olds who has never heard the word velo-news, if you mean the roadie old guys who never heard of FSA, if you mean the guys so much in allegiance to Santa Cruz bikes that they will convince you that you will die riding an Iron Horse, then no I will not trust them.Originally posted by MikeD
So it's better to write and get a crackpot answer based on whimsy and whatever product is advertising most in MBA that month, instead of advice based on personal experience of the shop guys?
Not saying shop guys aren't interested in selling you stuff to make profit (or pushing whatever happens to be on the sales floor), but they also don't want you back on their doorstep complaining that something broke. And they still can't force you to buy stuff that's outside of your budget...
MD
My point was that both of them could be pretty suspect...it came across differently...but that the shop guys could at least be held *somewhat* accountable for what they tell you. Also, the idea of 'forcing' someone to buy something out of their budget made me laugh. "No! NO FSA HEADSET FOR YOU!" They're salesmen, and will push their most expensive product, duh.Originally posted by nicklin
If by personal experience you mean a bumch of 15 year-olds who has never heard the word velo-news, if you mean the roadie old guys who never heard of FSA, if you mean the guys so much in allegiance to Santa Cruz bikes that they will convince you that you will die riding an Iron Horse, then no I will not trust them.
I think RC deserves a lot more credit than some of us give him. No one is perfect.
Mike, I'm not trying to dispute your point. The truth is though, that R.C.'s column in MBA magazine, not the website, are actually quite helpful when it comes to XC products. He can diagonose problem on a mechanic point of view for FREE when he hasn't even seen the parts that are in questions of, and if you actaully read the magazine, and if you are a pure xc rider, his advices strike me as some what helpful. But i tun my deaf ear to him when the discussion turns to any bike with a fork of 5+inch travel.Originally posted by MikeD
My point was that both of them could be pretty suspect...it came across differently...but that the shop guys could at least be held *somewhat* accountable for what they tell you. Also, the idea of 'forcing' someone to buy something out of their budget made me laugh. "No! NO FSA HEADSET FOR YOU!" They're salesmen, and will push their most expensive product, duh.
Personally, I'm with you...I don't use an LBS. Haven't found but 2 occasions where they were helpful.
However, that's 2 more times than RC has made sense. I found it rare (when I read MBA) to find even a coherent, relevant answer to a question in that column.
MD
well, let's see. R.C. was definitely right about the haro 8,3 being a good dirt jump bike, I've tried it for street situations and it's very nimble.Originally posted by WheelieMan
Have any of you seen R.C.s latest?
Q: What do you think about the Haro 8.3 as a stunt/jump bike?
R.C.: If you are into hardtails, the 8.3 is a perfect jumping bike. Youll need to upgrade the fork to a beefier, longer stroke type, like the marzocchi 888, before you start launching north shore type stunts.
HAHA
The said boyfriend wrote to MBA in a later issue and said that she actually bought him a bike (but I thought he had recommended the $3000 Mono frame, not the complete bike).hucker13 said:Oh, I once saw a question along the lines of
"I want to buy my boyfriend a new DH bike, as he is just getting into the sport"
R.C. answered: "Get him the $6,000 Foes Fly. That is a great DH bike."