could not have said it better myselfOriginally posted by Brian HCM#1
Bye bye Saddam:devil:
Originally posted by Ridemonkey
I don't consider myself a War monger. For example, I am opposed to invading Canada.
However, sometimes action must be taken. Saddam needs to go.
Yeah... too easyOriginally posted by Ridemonkey
I don't consider myself a War monger. For example, I am opposed to invading Canada.
Better yet lets just take B.C., the wait at the border cuts into quality time for me at Whistler. It would be so much easier to NOT have to stop and show papers at the border.Originally posted by -BB-
Yeah... too easy
Too cold
Let's invade Canada and steal their ICE
?como se dice air campaign?Originally posted by bullitking
I get the feeling its not gonna be as easy this time. They gonna be waitin with chem weapons. oh crap.
napalm makes papas fritasOriginally posted by BigHitWannabe
........but France opposes any action against Iraq...........?
all we'd find is a bunch of moose and mounties if we invaded canadaOriginally posted by Ridemonkey
I don't consider myself a War monger. For example, I am opposed to invading Canada.
However, sometimes action must be taken. Saddam needs to go.
Yeah, that's right! Just remember where you got that BB7!Originally posted by Mumbles
all we'd find is a bunch of moose and mounties if we invaded canada
hehe, just kidding. i do like my northern neighbors -- they're just fun to make fun of!
Originally posted by ChrisRobin
Why is France getting so much attention lately about them not wanting war??? No offence to France, but the last time big sh!t happened, they let the bad guys walk right through their front door!
Weapon of Mass Destuction = Nuke, biological or chemical agent, etc. as defined by international convention and treaty.Originally posted by bomberz1qr20
I'm gonna throw out some "flame bomberz1qr20" bate here:
So what is considered a "weapon of mass destruction"?
If we mis-fire a "smart bomb" and take out say, a hospital or school in Bagdad, (or a whole city block) isn't that considered a "weapon of mass destruction"?
If I thought that this was simply removing Saddam from power, then go for it.
This is about innocent people DYING FOR OUR OIL INTERESTS.
It happened in the last war, it'll happen in this one.
Discuss!
Yeah wait to see if anything bad happens over there, they will come running with their tails between their legs begging for help.Originally posted by ChrisRobin
Why is France getting so much attention lately about them not wanting war??? No offence to France, but the last time big sh!t happened, they let the bad guys walk right through their front door!
Originally posted by Ridemonkey
I don't consider myself a War monger. For example, I am opposed to invading Canada.
However, sometimes action must be taken. Saddam needs to go.
Exactly!Originally posted by Brian HCM#1
Yeah wait to see if anything bad happens over there, they will come running with their tails between their legs begging for help.
heheh, exactlyOriginally posted by ChrisRobin
Yeah, that's right! Just remember where you got that BB7!
I can't think of any country I'd rather have as a neighbor. Now if we could just move Japan closer....to cut down on the cost of getting their imports in here......?Originally posted by Mumbles
all we'd find is a bunch of moose and mounties if we invaded canada
hehe, just kidding. i do like my northern neighbors -- they're just fun to make fun of!
Ok your my hero.....couldnt have said it better myself...repeatedly abuse our friendship? Not only do they continually fail to contribute, but they actively hinder and antagonize us in the UN, the EU and by denying our boys use of their airspace for bombing runs. I only WISH "...the last time big sh!t happened" was their last incidence of duplicity and cowardice. That they continue to thumb their beret-propping elevated noses at us from fields made iron-rich with American blood sickens me to no end. While their "men" were busy clutching their ankles bent over the Maginot Line, ours were already planning their rescue.
Originally posted by Christian
I'm sorry, but I do not agree with your president... It seems to me that he is gun tooting Yahoo!!!!
...blah...blah...blah... zzzzzz...
My 2 cents.
France, Germany, and Russia have big oil contracts with Iraq. Why do you think they are opposed to war with Iraq? Because it's not in their best interest. Iraq stops shipping oil, refineries in France, Germany and Russia have to shut down and people loose jobs. Nevermind the fact that Saddam is a sadistic freak with dangerous weapons and little morals.Originally posted by Deyv
BIGHITWANABE?!?!?!
What the fu.ck is your problem with france? Your comments are straight up racist!
Consider yourself warned!
Originally posted by Deyv
BIGHITWANABE?!?!?!
What the fu.ck is your problem with france? Your comments are straight up racist!
Consider yourself warned!
they are ALL in it for the control of the oil(INCLUDING the u.s).morals having NOTHING to do with this war!!.if you go in you better be 100% damn sure they have "weapons of mass destruction" and that you shoot strait and kill the least amount of civilians because with only 4countries on your side,the terrorists will be flocking to the u.s borders afterwards!!Originally posted by mrbigisbudgood
France, Germany, and Russia have big oil contracts with Iraq. Why do you think they are opposed to war with Iraq? Because it's not in their best interest. Iraq stops shipping oil, refineries in France, Germany and Russia have to shut down and people loose jobs. Nevermind the fact that Saddam is a sadistic freak with dangerous weapons and little morals.
THAT is my problem with France (Germany and Russia). Turn the other cheek to a dangerous situation in the name of money. Now that is what I call morals.
Well said!!Originally posted by rbx
they are ALL in it for the control of the oil(INCLUDING the u.s).morals having NOTHING to do with this war!!
Originally posted by SandMan
Well said!!
They are all in it for the oil, the US and Britain are presently shut out of the oil in Iraq. What better way then to change the government, then pass "new contracts" to US and British oil companies. Look here.