Care to tell us why?stevew said:Excrement. If you have seen the commercials, don't bother with the movie.
It managed to bore me to sleep at a matinee showing. From what I vaguely remember of the book, they left a lot of explaining out of it.ito said:Care to tell us why?
The man doesn't even like beer. :hot:ito said:Care to tell us why?
I saw it. It wasn't incredible, but it was better than most of the crap released from the movie industry. Proved to be entertaining and the story didn't suck. I was expecting more exciting filming, but it worked out pretty well.
The Ito
Westy said:The man doesn't even like beer. :hot:
You mean comic books for adults...............ink:ito said:I can see if you are a fan of the graphic novels
I dont like beerWesty said:The man doesn't even like beer. :hot:
biggins said:i thought it was a badass flick and very well made. Whats his name (the actor that played V)did awesome.
hooples3 said:I thought it was a good movie... it def kept me entertained me for the 2 hrs . Plus it was a story line that has never been told
SeaPig said:You should ride more because film critique isn't your thing!
Me too, I think at around the same time I just went: Whaa? The end was cool, but blowing up the wonderful building brings a tear to my eye on top of which, in all honesty, this movie should have been set in America, after all the brothers seem to be going against the Bush administration with a Vengeance. Amid the sometimes non-sequitur holier-than-thou babble that kind of seeps out, which is typical of the Wachowski brothers trying to create their own pseudo-value system, it all seems a bit more like V is actually for Valueless.TheInedibleHulk said:Hugo Weaving
I saw it. About a third of the way through the movie I was way into it and then it lost me a bit in the middle. By it lost me I dont mean I couldnt follow, I mean that I lost involvement with it. Without giving away too much I think it was the captivity part that did it, too out there. The end was awesome but at that point it was a little too late for me. Overall it was better than most but was so close to greatness that I left a bit dissapointed. A few minor changes and it might be my new favorite movie.
it's not as violent as those two, but that's not saying much.I Are Baboon said:So just how violent is this flick? I want to see it, but the wife isn't too big on seeing a lot of graphic violence (e.g. Kill Bill and Sin City are not her cup of tea).
they would get arrested for terrorism anf the movie would never have gotten had they filmed it in america. everyone knows what country they are alluding to.imageWIS said:Me too, I think at around the same time I just went: Whaa? The end was cool, but blowing up the wonderful building brings a tear to my eye on top of which, in all honesty, this movie should have been set in America, after all the brothers seem to be going against the Bush administration with a Vengeance. Amid the sometimes non-sequitur holier-than-thou babble that kind of seeps out, which is typical of the Wachowski brothers trying to create their own pseudo-value system, it all seems a bit more like V is actually for Valueless.
Jon.
Hugo Weaving, you know...Mr. Smith from the Matrix flicks...biggins said:i thought it was a badass flick and very well made. Whats his name (the actor that played V)did awesome.
WTF are you talking about? They wouldnt have gotten arrested for terrorism if they filmed it in the US!biggins said:they would get arrested for terrorism anf the movie would never have gotten had they filmed it in america. everyone knows what country they are alluding to.
biggins said:they would get arrested for terrorism anf the movie would never have gotten had they filmed it in america. everyone knows what country they are alluding to.
N8 said:
The author wrote this about Margaret Thatcher's Britian... getta grip.