Sam, hands down. First, because it was World Champs, so way more pressure than a standard WC round. Second, because he still made the podium with his crash.so who had the most amazing run at val di sol?
Sam, hands down. First, because it was World Champs, so way more pressure than a standard WC round. Second, because he still made the podium with his crash.so who had the most amazing run at val di sol?
really? like actually? you think the guy that would have won by a smaller margin but crashed put up a better run then the guy who actually did win by a bigger margin? and you're not joking right now right?Sam, hands down. First, because it was World Champs, so way more pressure than a standard WC round. Second, because he still made the podium with his crash.
Might want to go re-watch it. For starters, tracks are never the same. They change from year to year, especially ones with snow in the winter. So while it's the same 'track' there are variables that make time comparisons moot, even on the same day, let alone years apart..... Also, track *conditions* are variables as well. How dry was the track? How hot was it? Etc etc. Year to year comparisons are only made out of poor judgment.really? like actually? you think the guy that would have won by a smaller margin but crashed put up a better run then the guy who actually did win by a bigger margin? and you're not joking right now right?
In 2008 that track was a beautiful tacky dirt alpine trail. Tops of the rocks were just peaking out the ground. Now it is completely eroded and over ridden. Is nothing but the holes and rocks. I actually think Beaumont had the most impressive result. People were baffled that year and he just stormed the whole thing.Sam, hands down. First, because it was World Champs, so way more pressure than a standard WC round. Second, because he still made the podium with his crash.
so conditions don't matter or they do?These guys just skip over the tops anyway.
They do indeed. Perhaps I confused you, but conditions change year to year because of dirt conditions, rain, course changes, etc. It isn't like a motor sport on a paved track where you can compare times years apart (even though temps are a factor). But some dirt going missing from between rocks that these guys skip over isn't what's going to make the largest difference is what I was meaning to convey because that happens anyway from Thursday to Sunday. it's the rerouting, differences in taping, accumulation of new dirt, re cutting lines, etc. I guess it all affects how a course 'evolves'. I believe bedlam is correct in saying it's hard if not impossible to compare times years apart in DH racing.so conditions don't matter or they do?
Man, Sam's time gets better every time somebody retells this story of how Rob Warner lost his sh1t.Second, Sam was more than 8 seconds ahead, and would have won by a larger margin than Gwin. Everyone who has watched that race knows it was more than 8 seconds.
Third, Sam still placed 3rd with that massive crash. That in itself is amazing.
IMO Sam's run there was more intense, visibly quicker, more stylish, and indeed more incredible.
I think atrokz said it very well. Plus, it's just my opinion. I'm admittedly a fan of Sam, but not a rabid fanboy.really? like actually? you think the guy that would have won by a smaller margin but crashed put up a better run then the guy who actually did win by a bigger margin? and you're not joking right now right?
1: He lost a massive amount of speed because of that crash. Going from, lets say 50kph (conservative guess) to 0KPH, in a high speed section, is a MASSIVE amount of time lost in a DH race. This isn't complicated.Placing well with a massive crash? Gimme a break - he was on a stormer of a run and went down. That crash didn't hold him up in the slightest in terms of getting back on the bike and getting going - he was already pointed down hill and it was a slideout, not a headsmasher. Also, Gwin had a crash/OTB/off the trail at MSA and WON the race. So theres that. Placing well with a crash is a big deal, but when you're comparing his run to Gwins, you're comparing him to a guy who is in a league above him.
It's all about the drama. That race had it all. Peaty in the hot seat trying to get the elusive World Championship. Sam making mince meat of the field on flats. Warner going out of his mind with stellar commentary. Gee cleaning up to crush Peaty's hopes again. Everybody in attendance knew Sam was the fastest that day.really? like actually? you think the guy that would have won by a smaller margin but crashed put up a better run then the guy who actually did win by a bigger margin? and you're not joking right now right?
Fair enough. But the point remains that Aaron Gwin has won a race that he crashed in his race run, and Sam Hill has not. Exclaiming "but he got 3rd place" doesn't hold much weight here. edit: Trying to dig up the video of him going off the trail and needing to yank his bike back up the hill right now for you.1: He lost a massive amount of speed because of that crash.
2: The section I bolded is the reason I'm going to ignore you now. That's an absurd statement.
hahahaha, I didn't expect to be in such a minority thinking gwins run was way cooler though, thats for sure.I see. I think Drth Vdr is summing it up nicely. also, when I watched the replays at the points where he crashes the time shows it's over 8 seconds from what I remember. It was that last woods section where he just pummeled the rocks.
I don't want to take away from Gwin at all, but I just saw that race as an outstanding show.
Also, this thread was bound to bring up this topic wasn't it?
This. Remember the stunning performance of Hill in Champery in '07?It's all about the drama. That race had it all. Peaty in the hot seat trying to get the elusive World Championship. Sam making mince meat of the field on flats. Warner going out of his mind with stellar commentary. Gee cleaning up to crush Peaty's hope again. Everybody in attendance new Sam was the fastest that day.
Gwin's run was amazing, but it didn't have the drama that creates a great victory that will be remember for all of time or the horrible feeling left from the agony of defeat when you were the best that day. That is what make Sam's run so much more memorable
This is the stupidest thing I've seen on here in a while. Especially after last weekend! Hill 6th with a mechanical and Gwin in 20th with no reported problems? Besides, 6 seconds, 10 seconds and even 30 seconds still puts these pros so far above us it's ridiculous to point the finger at one of them and say he isn't that good or washed up. Thank you, ECbut when you're comparing his run to Gwins, you're comparing him to a guy who is in a league above him.
Did you miss the part about bikes not being good because a racer had a bad day?This is the stupidest thing I've seen on here in a while.
Man, Sam's time gets better every time somebody retells this story of how Rob Warner lost his sh1t.
But if you actually take the time to look at his splits/race, heres what comes up instead: He was up 6.3 on Peat, and crashed about 15 seconds later. I'm pretty dubious of the claim that he picked up an additional 2 seconds within 15 seconds. But remember, peat was just the one in the hot seat at the time - he wouldn't have ended up with second had Sam not crashed. If you compare his time to Gee's, the racing was even more tight: He was up about 4 seconds on Gee when he crashed. Lets suppose that he hadn't crashed, and had made up 2 seconds on Gee in the remainder of the course (which seems incredibly suspect if you actually look at that section of the trail), his margin of victory STILL wouldn't have been as great as Gwin's. So yah. You're wrong on that count.
Placing well with a massive crash? Gimme a break - he was on a stormer of a run and went down. That crash didn't hold him up in the slightest in terms of getting back on the bike and getting going - he was already pointed down hill and it was a slideout, not a headsmasher. Also, Gwin had a crash/OTB/off the trail at MSA and WON the race. So theres that. Placing well with a crash is a big deal, but when you're comparing his run to Gwins, you're comparing him to a guy who is in a league above him.
But yeah, I agree that Hills run was visually more impressive because he looked like he was so close to falling the entire time (which he ended up doing because he couldn't handle it), and Gwin's run looked like he was just knocking out a DH run in perfect form, but to me the cooler of the two runs to watch is Gwins just because makes it look so easy.
It's teh bike: It demolized eyebrows and rock Jesus.Did you miss the part about bikes not being good because a racer had a bad day?
Fair enough, that is a little over the top. Nevertheless, I'll stand by Gwin having a more impressive run.This is the stupidest thing I've seen on here in a while. Especially after last weekend! Hill 6th with a mechanical and Gwin in 20th with no reported problems? Besides, 6 seconds, 10 seconds and even 30 seconds still puts these pros so far above us it's ridiculous to point the finger at one of them and say he isn't that good or washed up. Thank you, EC
yeah, a little bit, just like saying the other riders are having problem holding it together OR saying Gwin has no pressure to perform riding for the big SFair enough, that is a little over the top. Nevertheless, I'll stand by Gwin having a more impressive run.
Your rock skipping abilities are sub par, and you need to work on keeping it to the left of the root next run.Man it would be fun to have a bunch of guys on the interweb dissect some of my rides.
"Dude, that was totally way more mediocre than the other mediocre guy".
alright alright i got carried away, but Sam's run, had he not crashed, would not have been as impressive to me as Gwins run (although it was similar level). Its like comparing Gwin to Hart at champery worlds - Yeah, gwins run was great, but Hart didn't crash. Anyway, I've made a complete ass of myself trying to make my point and I'm going to stfu about it now.Man it would be fun to have a bunch of guys on the interweb dissect some of my rides.
"Dude, that was totally way more mediocre than the other mediocre guy".
well saidalright alright i got carried away, but Sam's run, had he not crashed, would not have been as impressive to me as Gwins run (although it was similar level). Its like comparing Gwin to Hart at champery worlds - Yeah, gwins run was great, but Hart didn't crash. Anyway, I've made a complete ass of myself trying to make my point and I'm going to stfu about it now.
Wow, he looked really fat over that rock. Like more fat than usual. The other fat old guy looked faster, probably because of shimz and yaw angles.Man it would be fun to have a bunch of guys on the interweb dissect some of my rides.
"Dude, that was totally way more mediocre than the other mediocre guy".
Maybe he's trying to peak at Worlds?Gwin had a rough day like Eli Tomac near the end of the season. Eli came roaring back hell for leather the next race...
I just think Gwin came into the season a little "under cooked".
A little too light on the pre-season race schedule.
He had commented last year about being disappointed by fizzing out at the end of the year, maybe tried starting a little less amped up this year.
pretty unlikely that he and specialized put much emphasis on doing well on that one.Maybe he's trying to peak at Worlds?
Good Thought. A logical one. It should not be in this thread. Slowly working his way into it just like Minaar who don't want to fubar before the real deal. Elusive for Gwin. Home town repeat for Minaar.Maybe he's trying to peak at Worlds?