Quantcast

Wal-Mart or IKEA? Or Welfare vs. Work?

DRB

unemployed bum
Oct 24, 2002
15,242
0
Watchin' you. Writing it all down.
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15269092/site/newsweek/

It's so expensive to hire people in Sweden that companies from IKEA on down would much rather you helped yourself, thank you. As for the self-assembly presumed by most IKEA purchases? That's part of it, too.
I guess they don't have IKEA greeters?

McKinsey warned in August that the high cost of doing business in Sweden would force companies to "move 100,000 to 200,000 jobs offshore in the next 10 years." Sweden has enjoyed outstanding economic growth, but it came in part because companies shed jobs to boost productivity. In the run-up to last month's general election, the independent National Institute of Economic Research suggested that Sweden had hit a growth ceiling: unless the labor supply expanded, GDP growth would slow.
Certainly, Fredrik Reinfeldt didn't. The new 41-year-old prime minister has made "work first" his top priority. Labor-market reform—getting people off the dole and back on the job—was the centerpiece of his maiden speech to Parliament two weeks ago, and it will be at the heart of the new budget to be presented this week. Reinfeldt promises to cut taxes, loosen the unions' grip on salaries, reduce unemployment benefits and generally make it easier to hire—and fire—employees.
So is better to work or be on welfare? Sounds like Sweeden is thinking that working might be a better idea.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
I always wonder, if we're handing out welfare checks anyway, why not force people to do some community service before they get them? Sure, there would be exceptions for 300lb single moms with 9 kids who cant afford childcare, but wow, cant alot of these people be put to use? Picking up trash or painting their section 8 housing? I see an underutilized workforce when I see a ghetto.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,419
22,507
Sleazattle
I always wonder, if we're handing out welfare checks anyway, why not force people to do some community service before they get them? Sure, there would be exceptions for 300lb single moms with 9 kids who cant afford childcare, but wow, cant alot of these people be put to use? Picking up trash or painting their section 8 housing? I see an underutilized workforce when I see a ghetto.
I bet you could boil down that 300 lb mother and her kids to fill a few SUV gas tanks.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,419
22,507
Sleazattle
Can you make biodiesel out of babies?
I don't see why not, but you would want to mix it with some other fuels so the exhaust doesn't have that baby stink.

It isn't very efficient to attempt a baby crop for the biodiesel though, the mother has to eat thousands of pound of feed to create only a few pounds or renderable material. I think kittens would make a better biodiesel crop.
 

DRB

unemployed bum
Oct 24, 2002
15,242
0
Watchin' you. Writing it all down.
I don't see why not, but you would want to mix it with some other fuels so the exhaust doesn't have that baby stink.

It isn't very efficient to attempt a baby crop for the biodiesel though, the mother has to eat thousands of pound of feed to create only a few pounds or renderable material. I think kittens would make a better biodiesel crop.
I wonder if it would be acceptable to use fetusi as biodiesel since you can't use them for stem cells?
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
It'd be funny if I kea was still owned and operated by a Swedish company.

It's been Danish for a few years now.

And as for those ont he take - sweden taxes it's population 50%, and still runs a surplus, even with these cheeseballs taking advantage of the system. It'd be sweet if the US and canada could even get that close to being efficient. Funny that they are in desperate need of labout and no one want sto work though.
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
I always wonder, if we're handing out welfare checks anyway, why not force people to do some community service before they get them? Sure, there would be exceptions for 300lb single moms with 9 kids who cant afford childcare, but wow, cant alot of these people be put to use? Picking up trash or painting their section 8 housing? I see an underutilized workforce when I see a ghetto.
Thing is, if a community or a company wants you to pick up their trash they should pay you a real salary for doing an actual job, not just a few crumbs that welfare actualy is. Welfare is for those who of some reason can't get a job and out of another reason can't get unemployment compensation.

It'd be funny if I kea was still owned and operated by a Swedish company.

It's been Danish for a few years now.

And as for those ont he take - sweden taxes it's population 50%, and still runs a surplus, even with these cheeseballs taking advantage of the system. It'd be sweet if the US and canada could even get that close to being efficient. Funny that they are in desperate need of labout and no one want sto work though.
Ikea is not operated as a company but by a foundation. To my knowledge it hasn't moved but I could be wrong.

I'll get back to the cheezballs and the first post a bit later.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Thing is, if a community or a company wants you to pick up their trash they should pay you a real salary for doing an actual job, not just a few crumbs that welfare actualy is. Welfare is for those who of some reason can't get a job and out of another reason can't get unemployment compensation.
Well if the reality of the situation even closely resembled the idea of it, we could agree. Its not like jobs are hard to come by here, and its not like they're doing anything else.
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
Ikea is not operated as a company but by a foundation. To my knowledge it hasn't moved but I could be wrong..
From what I understand, they moved the headquarters to Denmark a few years ago, and then possibly to the Netherlands after that. Not sure about the second move. They did a big thing up here on the 1 year anniversary of the move, where all uniforms were red and white for one day to celebreate it.

Founded in Sweden in 1943 and now based in Denmark, IKEA has endured growing pains since taking a gamble on its first U.S. location, a suburb of Philadelphia.
http://www.icsc.org/srch/sct/sct0402/page51.php

They have a weird structure. The foundation is based in the netherlands, the parent company INGKA is based in Denmark (as is head office) and the actual 7 businesses that make up the store, distribution, wholesale etc are based in Sweden. I cannot Believe I now know this much about Ikea.
 

DRB

unemployed bum
Oct 24, 2002
15,242
0
Watchin' you. Writing it all down.
It'd be funny if I kea was still owned and operated by a Swedish company.

It's been Danish for a few years now.
What does it matter who owns IKEA or where its headquartered?

rockwool said:
Thing is, if a community or a company wants you to pick up their trash they should pay you a real salary for doing an actual job, not just a few crumbs that welfare actualy is. Welfare is for those who of some reason can't get a job and out of another reason can't get unemployment compensation.
Okay that's fine but if the welfare amount is equal to the amount that you would be paid working somewhere doing something (WalMart greeter isn't that high pressure or crappy of a job) isn't that better. Doesn't that create a better sense of self-worth? Or is that important?
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
Okay that's fine but if the welfare amount is equal to the amount that you would be paid working somewhere doing something (WalMart greeter isn't that high pressure or crappy of a job) isn't that better. Doesn't that create a better sense of self-worth? Or is that important?
If its important to give people a sence of self-worth thru having a job? Of course it is! But it is equally important to give that feeling of self-worth to people thru things that hasn't got anything to do with work aswell. Because otherwise it will just mean that people who work are worth something, and as an example, a lot of seniors have problems feeling good about them selves since they stopped working.

Not even in "wellfare heaven", as some right wingers say Sweden is, do you get more money than to cover your basic bills (rent, electricity etc), your basic food and for a bus-pass. A job should give you a salary. If that salary isn't bigger than what that wellfare gives you, it is not a job. It is a beneficial slave labour.

Supermarkets aren't crappy jobs. They are decent jobs that should pay a decent salary, a salary one can make a living of.
I dare bet one of my nuts that wellfare in the US don't pay more than it does here, so it can't be as high as you make it sound. I mean, aren't they living on cupons n'stuff? Or are you actualy saying that a supermarket job don't pay more than the crumbs you get from wellfare?!! That would be a major shame on your society.
 

LordOpie

MOTHER HEN
Oct 17, 2002
21,022
3
Denver
first world countries need to start preparing for the decline in the standard of living. Global economics will continue to over-ride regional economics. Companies will farm jobs to where cheap labor is until that supply dwindles.

Labor follows the same supply-demand rules as any other comodity.

Start saving your assets before your ass gets handed to you.
 

SPINTECK

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2005
1,370
0
abc
first world countries need to start preparing for the decline in the standard of living. Global economics will continue to over-ride regional economics. Companies will farm jobs to where cheap labor is until that supply dwindles.

Labor follows the same supply-demand rules as any other comodity.

Start saving your assets before your ass gets handed to you.
YOu hit the nail right on the head. Most of the people I know by cheap stuff made overseas, by people who don't have the standard of living that we have. Then they bitch about their pay or job disappearing and having to pay for their healthcare. HELLLO- if you give your money to corporate raiders that employ slaves overseas, how do you think the job market in this country will survive?? It won't.

Dividend holders (wealthy people, banks, brokerage houses) make the money, but they're taxed less (one of the first things bush did was decrease the dividend tax to 15 percent) than people making an honest wage. You can work for a company and pay more tax than a person who made same amount of money off your company's dividend. True, most of use are told we will be on the recieving end of the dividends in our 401 K- but I would still be willing to pay my fair share of tax. I don't have a problem with wealthy people, but I hate how they don't have to pay their fair percent of taxes. I won't even bring up un-capping FICA.

As far as welfare, welfare benefits poor people with kids. If you have any kids you know how hard it is to feed and care for them. Time to work as a single parent and care for the kids?? Impossible. I hate how many people take for granted that they have a stable life, education, family and made good decisions. Poor people with less are penalized enough, do you really want to take away what little shelter and food the gov't provides for them?. Welfare also keeps people satisfied who would otherwise travel to your house, and rob from you.

Look at the French and Italians- they are smarter because they have more history to look back on. They support their local economy. I bought a jersey in Italy, made in Italy- imagine that!

One more thing- Walmart uses our socialized medicare and CHIPs insurance. They hire retiree's who get medicare and they teach their employees how to register their kids with CHIP's for insurance. How can honest companies that provide real health care to their employees compete with that?? I never go to Walmart.
 

noname

Monkey
Feb 19, 2006
544
0
outer limits
heres a little article I held onto last year for some god forsaken reason....
How high is total Swedish unemployment?

By Tino

This might not seem like a difficult question. After all, the unemployment number is readily available. It takes a few seconds to check up the American unemployment number, 5.1% in May. Sure there are speculations about discouraged workers leaving the workforce, but overall this is a reliable figure, useful for international and cross time comparison.

Not so with Sweden. Yes, there is an official number, 5.2% in May 2005. But this figure is almost compleatly worthless. The true unemployment number is in fact closer to 20%, as shown below.

Sweden has several massive government programs that contain must of the unemployed, chiefly Early Retirement, Sick Leave, Labor Market Programs and Welfare. In addition, since students get a monthly stipend and loan, many unemployed continue to study when they can’t find work.


Controversy


The right in Sweden has for some time complained about the government hiding the unemployment in ‘programs’. But the question only came to the public knowledge when LO, the immensely powerful blue-collar union had one of it’s own turn against them. Hans Karlsson, a leftwing heavyweight, concluded that true unemployment was more in the ballpark of 20-25%, not 5% as the government was claiming. To make things even worse this guy happened to have the name as the Minister for Labor!

A few weeks later another labor movement veteran actually become a whistle blower, resigning and exposing that LOs left wing research institute had pressured him not to include the estimated true unemployment figure in a study. Embarrassing stuff indeed.

For a century the Social Democratic Labor Party parties and their allies in the Unions had Full Employment as one of their two ideological pillars (the other being an equal distribution of income). To now admit they have failed in this would be a huge defeat.

Furthermore, the party won the last two elections on the platform that cutting taxes would jeopardize underfunded Social Services. If Swedes were to conclude much of their taxes doesn’t go to welfare, but to support working age adults, their willingness to continue paying them might be reduced.

One key to understand this figure is that we have seen in the past few years is that the already high rate of sick leave has exploded. Yes, you wouldn’t guess it if you saw us, but Sweden has the sickest population in the world. Some 14% of the adult Swedish population does not work due to reported sickens. 540 000 were early retired (officially for health reasons) December 2004, fully 10% of the adult population. In addition more than 5% of the working population is on sick leave any given day.


Estimating the true unemployment rate


I will try to calculate the figure using data from the Swedish Statistical Agency (SCB) Labor survey, first quarter 2005. The calculations and adjustments are too messy to show here, but will be given by request.

Two notes. I have adjusted their Sick Leave number. Also all figures are from SCB, except the number only on welfare which I got from Tax researcher Dane Nordlings homepage. http://danne-nordling.blogspot.com/2005/05/hur-mnga-r-egentligen-arbetslsa.html


Table 1. First quarter of 2005, adjusted.

Population 16-64 - -- - - 5755.000

Not in laborforce - - - - - - 1.365.000
Early retired - - - - - - - - - (494.000)
Seek work - - - - - - - - - - - (150.000)
Get Welfare - - - - - - - - - - (84.000)

Labor Force - - - - - - - - - 4.391.000
Unemployed(5.6%) - - - - - (245.000)
unemply programs - - - - - (130.000)

Employed in Real job - - - - 4.016.000
Absent from work - - - - - - (554.000)
Of which on Sick leave- - - (216.000)

Actually work - - - - - - - 3.469.000


4.0 million (70% of adult population) in productive activity rate, 1.2 million (20%) living of welfare and Health or unemployment insurance alone.


Range of estimate: 8.5%-26%


So what is Swedish unemployment? The question hinges on who we include, and especially Sweden’s case especially on how much of early retirement and sick leave is hidden unemployment.

Even the Swedish governments acknowledges that the 130.000 in “Labor market political programs” simply unemployed, so we start from 8.5%.

For international comparisons we probably should not include the students and other’s who want work but can’t get it, since all countries have this category. But for policy matter in Sweden we should. Also including welfare recipients we get 13.2%.

The hard question is what to do with all the absentees. If we include all of them we end up with 26%. Note that we are not including absentees for any other reasons than Sick Leave and also excluding the underemployed.

Now this last figure is clearly too high. Many people who report sick are of course really too sick to work. It does show us the range, and is probably closer to the actual number than 8.5%.

It is anybodies guess how many who could go back to work if it paid to work. There is plenty of evidence that strong economic incentives to report sick matters. (I full account on this research another day).

Sweden had some 26 days lost per worker in 2002. In Canada, hardly a much sicker or slave driving nation, the corresponding figure (2004) were 7.5 days per full time worker lost every year due to sick leave (Statcan.ca). Britain had a similar figure, 7.2 days lost per worker and year in 2003 (CBI annual absence survey)


My Best Guess


As plausible comparisons I use the rates of early retirement in 1960 and the sick leave of slightly above Canada’s. Both would seem to exaggerate the number, we are for example much healthier now than in 1960.

Not counting the forced student, the underemployed or all other absentees the Swedish unemployment rate would be 19.8% fully 962.000 out of work of a workforce of 4.848.000 (add the latent jobless to get 22.5%).

Unemployed (245.) + Programs (130.) + Welfare (84.) = 459.000

Unemployment hidden in Early retirement (373.000) and Sick Leave (131.000) = 504.000

Total 962.000 out of work, Labor force 4.848.000.

In practice I think this 19.8% figure is somwehat comparable to rates for the US and other market economies. I am not sure however we should compare it to the “raw” figures of Germany or France, since they too hide unemployment in other welfare systems (though probably no country does as much as Sweden).

Next time I hope to write more detailed on how this high unemployment and welfare dependency figure has lead to chronically underfunded Social services.

By tino.sanadaji@gmail.com
Posted at June 26, 2005 01:03 AM
 

noname

Monkey
Feb 19, 2006
544
0
outer limits
Here's one for those "disappearing" jobs...
Disappearing Manufacturing Jobs
by Walter Williams (May 4, 2006)

According to some pundits and political hustlers, free trade has led to a loss of "good manufacturing jobs." Let's look at it, but before doing so, let's first see whether we should work ourselves into a tizzy over other job losses.

In 1900, 41 percent of the U.S. labor force was employed in agriculture. Now, only two percent of today's labor force works in agricultural jobs. If declining employment is used as a gauge of an industry's health, agriculture is America's sickest industry.

Let's not stop with agriculture. In 1970, the telecommunications industry employed 421,000 workers in good-paying jobs as switchboard operators. Today, the telecommunications industry employs only 78,000 operators. That's a tremendous 80 percent job loss. What happened to all those agriculture and switchboard operator jobs? Were they exported to China and India by rapacious businessmen?

The easy and correct answer is that our agricultural sector has seen massive gains in productivity as a result of advances in farm machinery, innovation and technology. There have also been spectacular advances in telecommunications. In 1970, those 421,000 switchboard operators annually handled 9.8 billion long-distance calls. Now 100 billion long-distance calls a year require only 78,000 switchboard operators. What's more is, the cost of making a long-distance call is a fraction of what it was in 1970.

Here's my question to you: Should Congress do something to restore all of those jobs lost in agriculture and telecommunications, and what might that something be?

The tremendous gains in productivity seen in agriculture, telecommunications and some other industries have benefited the manufacturing industry as well. According to David Huether, chief economist of the National Association of Manufacturers, U.S. manufacturers are producing and exporting more goods than ever before. While manufacturing output easily outpaces the larger U.S. economy, manufacturing employment, at 14.2 million, is at its lowest level in more than 50 years.

How do we reconcile lower manufacturing employment with rising manufacturing output? In his April 3, 2006, BusinessWeek article, "The Case of the Missing Jobs," Huether says, "Since 2001, with the aid of computers, telecommunications advances, and ever more efficient plant operations, U.S. manufacturing productivity, or the amount of goods or services a worker produces in an hour, has soared a dizzying 24 percent. That's 72 percent faster than the average productivity advance during America's four most recent recession-recovery cycles dating back to the 1970s. In short: We're making more stuff with fewer people." That means rapid economic growth doesn't translate into the kind of manufacturing job creation of earlier periods.

How about the claim that our manufacturing jobs are going to China? The fact of business is, since 2000, China has lost 4.5 million manufacturing jobs, compared with the loss of 3.1 million in the U.S.

Job loss is the trend among the top 10 manufacturing countries who produce 75 percent of the world's manufacturing output (the U.S., Japan, Germany, China, Britain, France, Italy, Korea, Canada and Mexico). Only Italy has managed not to lose factory jobs since 2000.

Economist Joseph Schumpeter referred to this process witnessed in market economies as "creative destruction," where technology and innovation destroy some jobs while creating others. While the process works hardships on some, any attempt to impede the process will make all of us worse off.

Imagine for a moment that technology hadn't destroyed most of the jobs of those 41 percent of Americans working in agriculture in 1900.

Where in the world would we have gotten the manpower to make all those goods produced now that weren't even imagined in 1900? Jobs destroyed through the market forces of creative destruction make us all better off, and that applies also to job destruction that comes from peaceable, voluntary exchange with people in different cities, states and countries.
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
It's so expensive to hire people in Sweden that companies from IKEA on down would much rather you helped yourself, thank you. As for the self-assembly presumed by most IKEA purchases? That's part of it, too.
That article writer sounds like a spoilt person, with his thumb right in his palm and has always had servants to wipe his ass for him.

IKEA is obviously a briliant idea, it wouldn't have become that big if it wasn't. To make furniture cheaper by letting people assemble them by them selves. That is a major cost every where, exept for third world countries, and therefore a much lower price out towards the costumer. Finaly, IKEA manufactures their stuff in a lot of countries. The article writer is full of crap.

McKinsey warned in August that the high cost of doing business in Sweden would force companies to "move 100,000 to 200,000 jobs offshore in the next 10 years." Sweden has enjoyed outstanding economic growth, but it came in part because companies shed jobs to boost productivity. In the run-up to last month's general election, the independent National Institute of Economic Research suggested that Sweden had hit a growth ceiling: unless the labor supply expanded, GDP growth would slow.
US companies never threatened to move jobs to Mexico? They want maximum profits, and the well being of their countrymen are the furthest from their minds. Always bitchin on people, that are to sick to go to work, being bad for the country but wouldn't hesitate put hundreds of thousands in unemployment dispare for a dollar more profit.

The labor force is expanding with EU citizens. The streets of Stockholm are full of Polish and Latvian cars.

Reinfeldt promises to cut taxes, loosen the unions' grip on salaries, reduce unemployment benefits and generally make it easier to hire—and fire—employees.
Yeah, major tax cuts are comming. Dunno how they will fund everything though. Unions are obviously the devil. The right wing has always been fighting against the organization of the poor man. But look at the rich and you will see that they are organized too. They wouldn't be close to effective if they weren't, but the devil has always been the organizations of the poor man...

first world countries need to start preparing for the decline in the standard of living. Global economics will continue to over-ride regional economics. Companies will farm jobs to where cheap labor is until that supply dwindles.

Labor follows the same supply-demand rules as any other comodity.

Start saving your assets before your ass gets handed to you.
True, but our standard of living has to decline out of enviromental reasons aswell. Or, mother earth will be hell to live on.

Most of the people I know by cheap stuff made overseas, by people who don't have the standard of living that we have. Then they bitch about their pay or job disappearing and having to pay for their healthcare. HELLLO- if you give your money to corporate raiders that employ slaves overseas, how do you think the job market in this country will survive?? It won't.
I think you guys in the US are pretty good at being consious consumers. You've been promoting domesticlay made products for the sake of your jobs since the 80's at least. I hardly ever come across a person that thinks that way over here. Personaly, I not only look at if sertain companies are ethical, but I don't buy products from countries I think aren't good natured in their foreign and domestic politics. Gotta "shut them down" like Public Enemy said.

Dividend holders (wealthy people, banks, brokerage houses) make the money, but they're taxed less (one of the first things bush did was decrease the dividend tax to 15 percent) than people making an honest wage. You can work for a company and pay more tax than a person who made same amount of money off your company's dividend. True, most of use are told we will be on the recieving end of the dividends in our 401 K- but I would still be willing to pay my fair share of tax. I don't have a problem with wealthy people, but I hate how they don't have to pay their fair percent of taxes. I won't even bring up un-capping FICA.
Ever heard of the Tobin tax? If I remember it correctly it was a proposal that international business with shares should be taxed with 1-2% and that the money would go to the poorer countries some how. Never came true. The greedy effed the most needy, again.

I hate how many people take for granted that they have a stable life, education, family and made good decisions.
Don't forget to ad luck on that list.
Perhaps it's an inability of mankind that we can't our selves in the shoes of our brother?
 

rockwool

Turbo Monkey
Apr 19, 2004
2,658
0
Filastin
heres a little article I held onto last year for some god forsaken reason....
How high is total Swedish unemployment?
That article is very typical for how the right wing propaganda has been like. Probably pretty similar to what it is in many countries, the view that the workers are nothing but expendable means to produce riches, and also must be whiped to move, not given carrots.

Sweden has several massive government programs that contain must of the unemployed, chiefly Early Retirement, Sick Leave, Labor Market Programs and Welfare. In addition, since students get a monthly stipend and loan, manyunemployed continue to study when they can’t find work.
It is partialy true about Early Retirement (partialy because there could be other reasons to that I don't know of), people over 50 or something are looked upon as too old to learn something new and/or just not worth the effort, by the employers. After some years of unemployment they get an early retirement. Whos foult is it that they don't get hired?

Sick Leave, people that are too burnt out mentaly or just used up physicly, like kids in Pakistan that reach the age of 12-14 and get fired because their hands are too worn out to saw them leather Adidas footballs in a pace high enough to the bosses liking.. It is humans we are talking about here, not a car that you can change some bushes and bearings and make it keep on going forever. People have a right to reach retirement and still be able to do more than sit around like a parcel waiting to get fed and wiped.

The Labour Market Programs are for to get the unemployed to learn new trades so that they can get a job in a field that they previously didn't have any competence in. The employers also are more willing to hire people that are activly working with something than those unemployed that are looking for jobs..

The God forsaken Wellfare... On the radio today they said that the new government has made it possible for forigners to get a work permit for two years (which can be renewed). They are looking for some people with higher education, like doctors.
Maybe they should look for doctors among those on wellfare instead of importing "gast arbeits"? Because in the land of Sweden, those on wellfare are highly educated but lazy people, and not the unfortunate bottom of the society, like alcoholics and such.

"since students get a monthly stipend and loan"
What is that supposed to mean? Is it unusual and a bad thing in the US for students to get a stipend and loan? Is it bad for a society give everybody an opportunity to fullfill their dreams, aswell as have the goal to continously raise the general knowledge of its people?

The right wing have forever fought against the spreading of knowledge as opposed to the working class movement that has held it as one of the most important things in a society. Educated people are not as easily fooled as the illiterate. In 1990 the Social Democrats made the third year of high school oblicatory (more theoretical classes) for kids that learn a trade, so that they too so that they to get a more solid ground to stand on, and therefore a better start in life. The right wing fought against this and have said it will change it back..

The right in Sweden has for some time complained about the government hiding the unemployment in ‘programs’. But the question only came to the public knowledge when LO, the immensely powerful blue-collar union had one of it’s own turn against them. Hans Karlsson, a leftwing heavyweight, concluded that true unemployment was more in the ballpark of 20-25%, not 5% as the government was claiming. To make things even worse this guy happened to have the name as the Minister for Labor!

A few weeks later another labor movement veteran actually become a whistle blower, resigning and exposing that LOs left wing research institute had pressured him not to include the estimated true unemployment figure in a study. Embarrassing stuff indeed.
Can't comment on this as I know nothing about it.

For a century the Social Democratic Labor Party parties and their allies in the Unions had Full Employment as one of their two ideological pillars (the other being an equal distribution of income). To now admit they have failed in this would be a huge defeat.
Thing is, we've had it pretty good here just until two decades back. Up until the great recession in the early-mid 90's the unemployment was at about 2%. I remember that in the 80's one had no problem getting a job by just finishing junior high.

The equal distribution of income was working pretty fine still in the 80's. In 1980 the average CEO had a salary 8 times higher than the average worker. 20 some years later that gap had risen to about 44 times higher. Swedes have been until recently a people with pretty little materialism and vanity on their minds, compared to the Greeks.
Things started to change during the 80's.

One key to understand this figure is that we have seen in the past few years is that the already high rate of sick leave has exploded. Yes, you wouldn’t guess it if you saw us, but Sweden has the sickest population in the world. Some 14% of the adult Swedish population does not work due to reported sickens. 540 000 were early retired (officially for health reasons) December 2004, fully 10% of the adult population. In addition more than 5% of the working population is on sick leave any given day.
Well, it's a pretty depressive ****in country if you look at the suicide statistics. 2nd to Japan if I'm not mistaken....and it's not a recent thing eather.
I share the view that many people tend to call in sick a bit easy. The slightest sign of a bugger and it is bed all day with the feet up high and thé with honey... But to count those 5% in among the unemployed? Is that a common thing to do among your statistics too?

For international comparisons we probably should not include the students and other’s who want work but can’t get it, since all countries have this category. But for policy matter in Sweden we should. Also including welfare recipients we get 13.2%.
Screeee (cartoon panic break), wait a minute. For "policy matter", what the f does that mean? What kind of a comparison is made on unequal grounds? "Also including welfare recipients", which employer is going to hire the outcast that don't even want to hire people that have worked for 35 years of their lives or those in unemployment programs?

Sweden had some 26 days lost per worker in 2002. In Canada, hardly a much sicker or slave driving nation, the corresponding figure (2004) were 7.5 days per full time worker lost every year due to sick leave (Statcan.ca). Britain had a similar figure, 7.2 days lost per worker and year in 2003 (CBI annual absence survey)
That is interesting!

As plausible comparisons I use the rates of early retirement in 1960 and the sick leave of slightly above Canada’s. Both would seem to exaggerate the number, we are for example much healthier now than in 1960.
And hopefully our caring and empaty has grown with time too so that more people dare to speak up about their illnesses.

Not counting the forced student, the underemployed or all other absentees the Swedish unemployment rate would be 19.8% fully 962.000 out of work of a workforce of 4.848.000 (add the latent jobless to get 22.5%).

In practice I think this 19.8% figure is somwehat comparable to rates for the US and other market economies. I am not sure however we should compare it to the “raw” figures of Germany or France, since they too hide unemployment in other welfare systems (though probably no country does as much as Sweden).
To summerize, all those he considers to be "unemployed" are a lost potential to make a profit on. The top of the pyramid craves more $ from the bottom.
 

DaveW

Space Monkey
Jul 2, 2001
11,754
3,243
The bunker at parliament
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/15269092/site/newsweek/

I guess they don't have IKEA greeters?

So is better to work or be on welfare? Sounds like Sweeden is thinking that working might be a better idea.

NZ is currently at the opposite extreme..... the unemployment rate is so low that it's hurting the ecconomy.

So few people unemployed and looking for work that to get new staff company's now have to offer borderline uneconomicly (is that a word?? ) high wages and conditions to even get people to apply for the jobs! :eek:

My own company was looking for a stitcher operator and a folder operator but only got 2 replys over a month...... and one of those aplicants was so stoned he couldn't manage to get more than 2 coherant sentances out at a time in the interview! :banghead: :disgust1: :huh:
 

loco-gringo

Crusading Clamp Monkey
Sep 27, 2006
8,887
14
Deep in the heart of TEXAS
<snip>One more thing- Walmart uses our socialized medicare and CHIPs insurance. They hire retiree's who get medicare and they teach their employees how to register their kids with CHIP's for insurance. How can honest companies that provide real health care to their employees compete with that?? I never go to Walmart.
Yeah - those bastards are going to establish $4 prescriptions on generic drugs in 14 states next year. They are doing it for profit, of course, but I can't help but think that it will help some under priveledged people. It may pain you, but WalMart, while not great, is not a corporation formed by satan. They found a business model that works, and people hate them for parts of that model. Sure I can find some fault, but I can find some good too.
 

valve bouncer

Master Dildoist
Feb 11, 2002
7,843
114
Japan
NZ is currently at the opposite extreme..... the unemployment rate is so low that it's hurting the ecconomy.

So few people unemployed and looking for work that to get new staff company's now have to offer borderline uneconomicly (is that a word?? ) high wages and conditions to even get people to apply for the jobs! :eek:

My own company was looking for a stitcher operator and a folder operator but only got 2 replys over a month...... and one of those aplicants was so stoned he couldn't manage to get more than 2 coherant sentances out at a time in the interview! :banghead: :disgust1: :huh:
Same over in Western Australia, unemployment is about 3%. I was reading the other day about the manager of a fast food restaurant in an isolated area getting US$1500 a week plus housing because it's almost impossible to get people there. They're handing out guest worker visas like Smarties in Australia.

Good to see the Kiwis riding on our backs btw. Typical.:rant: ;)
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Same over in Western Australia, unemployment is about 3%. I was reading the other day about the manager of a fast food restaurant in an isolated area getting US$1500 a week plus housing because it's almost impossible to get people there. They're handing out guest worker visas like Smarties in Australia.

Good to see the Kiwis riding on our backs btw. Typical.:rant: ;)
Damn, is there a high demand for fisheries biologists down there? How about physical therapists?
 

valve bouncer

Master Dildoist
Feb 11, 2002
7,843
114
Japan
Damn, is there a high demand for fisheries biologists down there? How about physical therapists?
Seriously Shirl, if you're interested you'd get into Australia no probs at the moment as you're American (speak English) and got tertiary education. Your missus, being a health professional, would get in easy, especially if you were prepared to work in an isolated area (i.e mining area). Christ, if you can drive a truck you can get $2000 a week.
Give your nearest Australian consulate a call and see what they say.
 

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
Seriously Shirl, if you're interested you'd get into Australia no probs at the moment as you're American (speak English) and got tertiary education. Your missus, being a health professional, would get in easy, especially if you were prepared to work in an isolated area (i.e mining area). Christ, if you can drive a truck you can get $2000 a week.
Give your nearest Australian consulate a call and see what they say.
While the wife and I were in Thailand, we met a dude from Canatia and his Dutch gf. They picked grapes at the vineyards in Australia, saved their earnings and backpacked around Asia. Oddly enough, it was quite lucrative if you had low living expenses (which they did)... When funds got low, they just went back to Oz and picked some more grapes for a couple months.... Then off to more exotic spots.....That's livin'.
 

DaveW

Space Monkey
Jul 2, 2001
11,754
3,243
The bunker at parliament
Damn, is there a high demand for fisheries biologists down there? How about physical therapists?
Lot's of Marine biology stuff going on in NZ these days. Crown reasearch companys like NIWA and the Deptment of conservation do Heaps in that area, then there's all the comercial aquaculture. And Physical therapist's? Hell there's Heaps of work aqround for them! :D

*edit* Jobs page here ;)