i hear all this talk about weight in people's downhill bikes. do you guys think that weight really has that big an effect? will five pounds really slow you down that much?
virtually everything you do on a bike is an acceleration, turning, acellerating forward, pedaling, manuvering, etc...weight makes a huge difference because everytime we pedal, or change something (our path) it is an accelleration. It's not just our wheels, it's the big picture, and while our body is the "center", the bike and it's extremeties are the lever. This is why a big heavy bike will tire the hell out of you, no matter HOW great it pedals (or how great it's claime to pedal, hehe )
You're not wrong Jm_. I remember when my mate who was on a big old heavy DH rig had a go on my 222 last year, he couldn't believe how easy it was to change lines, flick the front end around, corner, etc etc.
It is a trade off for weight and strength...you make your choices and have to deal with them.
DH tubes or XC tubes...to Flat or not to flat.
Light weight wheels or bomb proof wheels...taco'd wheel or tacos for lunch.
Etc, etc.
The lightest you can make your bike while still having a strong rig is my ideal. now I am fat so my parts are even heavier.
While weight should be a consideration....it shouldn't go to the extremes that some bike part go to....that damn carbon(no pad) shell seat thing....that is a trip to the ER looking to happen on a Dh bike.
It is all a trade off. (this is a general rule, not all encompassing)
Don't forget price. There's an old Keith Bontrager quote about bikes that goes something like: "Cheap, light, and strong. Pick two."
Lots of riders end up with heavier rigs because they need strength and can't afford to pay for stuff that is both strong and light. Parts that are light and strong are usually way pricey.
I agree though, regardless of suspension, etc., a lighter bike is easier to ride, more tossable, easier to accelerate, change direction, etc., and will result in much less fatigue at the end of a long day - even if it's a lift-assisted day. About the only downside is that a lighter bike is slightly less settled at speed in places like rock gardens and other gnarly stuff. There's probably a physics explanation having to do with mass and momentum or something, all I know is that it's easier to get knocked off your line on a lighter bike.
For racing I'd say five pounds is a lot. That's more than 10% of a 45 lb bike. At the elite level where every detail counts, all other things being equal I'd guess five pounds could be enough to lose a place or two.
Last year i raced a 52lb banshee scream. It had a shiver and 2.7" tires on doubletrack rims. This year im on a 45 lb turner DHR with a boxxer, and 2.5" tires on azonic outlaws. So 7lbs lighter comparing bikes. i have much less weight in my wheels and fork. I can really feel a difference. The bike is easier to accelerate for sure. Its also easier to whip around in corners, but its also alot differnt in geometry/COG than the scream, so maybe thats not a good comparison. I can also pop the bike off stuff much easier, the scream took alot more effort to get in the air. I can say though the heavier bike seemed to be more stable in the air, but harder to get styled on a jump. i still have my beefy wheels that i put on for whistler/ heavy Freeriding. I'll take the tradeoff of weight for some strenght for all day abuse.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.