I really love my chrome N9, but the XL is a touch too big for me. Might have to live with a 2 tone lesser finish that I can throw around a little easier...
27 wheels and overfork it. STA is overrated anyway.no doubt. 67.5-68* sagged? that's near unridabru in these parts.
***starts at $250***if i were in the market for a hardtail, i'd be going marino; full custom, $250. go wild:
https://www.marinobike.com/producto/custom-hardtail-mtb-frame/
Nope. That money is only for education expenses and programs to... you guessed it, keep kids off weed.weed money
mountain biking is kinda the opposite of thatNope. That money is only for education expenses and programs to... you guessed it, keep kids off weed.
The lower link moves in there. The front triangle is stiff as fuck, believe me.Why not continue the ST down full length? There has to be a way and it surely would be more stout/ stiff.
The balance is much stiffer than my Riot. Plus you can route a dropper post under it if you want a super long post slammed in.Why not continue the ST down full length? There has to be a way and it surely would be more stout/ stiff.
Small | Medium | Large | XLarge | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Top Tube Length (Effective) | 592mm | 611mm | 632mm | 653mm |
Reach | 438mm | 457mm | 476mm | 496mm |
Stack | 606mm | 606mm | 611mm | 615mm |
Standover Height | 697mm | 725mm | 743mm | 762mm |
Seat Tube Length | 380mm | 410mm | 450mm | 490mm |
Wheel Base | 1190mm | 1216mm | 1237mm | 1259mm |
Head Tube Angle | 64° | 64° | 64° | 64° |
Seat Tube Angle (Effective) | 75.7° | 75.7° | 75.7° | 75.7° |
Seat Tube Angle (Actual) | 70.3° | 70.3° | 70.3° | 70.3° |
Chainstay Length | 420mm | 420mm | 420mm | 420mm |
Bottom Bracket Drop | 12.4mm | 12.4mm | 12.4mm | 12.4mm |
Bottom Bracket Height (*Approximate) | 343mm | 343mm | 343mm | 343mm |
Head Tube length | 105mm | 105mmm | 115mm | 115mm |
Serious question, is the Ripmo AF a success? I know it gets great reviews, and PB commenters all swear they're going to buy one, but I live down the street from one of Ibis's top 10 dealers, they've only sold a handful and I've never seen one in the wild despite the local trails being littered with Ibis bikes.I wonder if the success of the Aluminum Ripmo AF contributed to their decision to stick with the metal.
I have heard from several places that Ibis themselves have been surprised by the success of the Ripmo AF. I also disagree about the $3K aluminum bike market - at least in the PNW, the number of aggressive and smartly-spec'd builds with alloy frames have spiked very sharply, mostly driven by Transition's latest crop of bikes. People are starting to realize that they care a bit less about weight with modern drivetrains and suspension performance, and prioritization of spending seems to be going more towards suspension and wheels.Serious question, is the Ripmo AF a success? I know it gets great reviews, and PB commenters all swear they're going to buy one, but I live down the street from one of Ibis's top 10 dealers, they've only sold a handful and I've never seen one in the wild despite the local trails being littered with Ibis bikes.
Don't get me wrong, I like the Ripmo AF, and this new Canfield, but I don't see the $3k aluminum bike market panning out. Too expensive to truly be entry level, and most people who have $3k to buy a bike either buy used, or can come up with another $1000-1500 to get into something with a legit drive train. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though.