...and the right-wing whitewash continues, unabated.
Whats the over/under....
That's what SHE said! um....oh...
Intentionally obtuse. A guy like $tinkle in 1950s Germany would sit there and swear to your face that he had no idea that Jews were being murdered, all while his SS uniform from the Sobibor days is packed away, carefully boxed, in the top of his closet.
And, if Jews WERE killed, it was clearly the work of communist infiltrators.
And this is MY point. In this context you are no better than Beck and Palin and their usual "assumptions" that the MSM, Liberal left, etc etc etc is to blame right out of the gate.
Either that or you are goddamn Matlock and have solved this case and tried it before all the evidence has come in about the shooter.
(Mainly his friends classified him as a liberal leftist and for the most part, FBI is convinced he's a nut case.)
Obama, "Punish Our Enemies"
Celebrating Bush's shoe-thrower
Olbermann's Worst Persons
But I guess we should start the witch hunt on the Republicans?
Clearly all horrible horrible acts, which have no analog in the frothosphere...
God forbid we not condemn a man who threw a shoe at the man who wrecked his country and killed a million people.
ARE YOU ****ING SERIOUS? Or are you huffing gold spray paint?
In a radio interview that aired on Univision on Monday, Mr. Obama sought to assure Hispanics that he would push an immigration overhaul after the midterm elections, even though he has not been able to attract Republican support.
If Latinos sit out the election instead of saying, Were going to punish our enemies and were gonna reward our friends who stand with us on issues that are important to us, if they dont see that kind of upsurge in voting in this election, then I think its going to be harder and thats why I think its so important that people focus on voting on November 2.
That's full ****ing retard, my friend.
Actually, no, I was only referring to the point that the right-wing will never, ever disassociate a killer/terrorist's ethnicity or religious background if it is either middle-eastern, Muslim, or both. If you can find me instances of the right-wing calling the 9/11 hijackers "a bunch of mentally unstable young men" while omitting any reference to their religious beliefs or ethnic background, I'm all ears. It doesn't matter whether the person occasionally frequented a mosque (in between strip-club visits), was a 3rd generation immigrant from Egypt, or visited Pakistan when he was in college, if he goes out and kills people the right wing is going th bring that up. However when the killer is a white person who was raised in a Christian household and just happens to have certain right-wing beliefs/tenancies suddenly they start talking about "the actions of one delusional and/or mentally unstable person".
Sure enough, when trying to describe a "left wing terrorist", $tinkle brings up Nadal's ethnicity and religious beliefs.
Reading is FUNdamental.
From a pragmatic standpoint, liberals don't use gun-imagery, speak in veiled tones about 2nd Amendment corrections, and suggest violent revolution.
Many Republicans do.
My interest is how Republicans talk about this and what they say in the future.
Palin is the perfect example. She lives in a world of guns, and she has embraced it as a political tool. She thought it was cute to use bullseyes to target her political opponents, and now she has to deal with the fallout.
Many Republicans do.
My interest is how Republicans talk about this and what they say in the future.
Palin is the perfect example. She lives in a world of guns, and she has embraced it as a political tool. She thought it was cute to use bullseyes to target her political opponents, and now she has to deal with the fallout.
Well, I'm glad you have decided to ramp up the rhetoric.
Are his friends Fascists? Even Faux News is now reporting that this kid might have connections with an anti-semetic/anti-immigrant hate group.
Yea, sounds like a total liberal fag to me. Hell, this kid and Glenn Beck are only one drum circle away from joining Greenpeace to go fight the Japanese whaling fleet.
Skaredshtless is the government?
Last edited:
This isn't like Operation Rescue, where the leaders are targeting certain doctors, including releasing their personal information.
There is a charged political environment now.
My favorite 2 MSNBC personalities are Olbermann and Schultz, who are both yelling from the pulpit. Which I happen to like.
Olbermann has also come out to apologize if anything he has said might have caused this, something which I don't expect to hear from the Fox talking heads.
There is a charged political environment now.
My favorite 2 MSNBC personalities are Olbermann and Schultz, who are both yelling from the pulpit. Which I happen to like.
Olbermann has also come out to apologize if anything he has said might have caused this, something which I don't expect to hear from the Fox talking heads.
apart from the fact i was asserting nidal malik hasan was not tbagger material, i would expect when politics or religion is a significant factor to their actions -- usually *the* factor -- this is appropriate [making teh correlation]
i would expect the same from you as well.
guess who did this?
more here for when you get cumdrunk from reading huffpo:
http://hillbuzz.org/2011/01/08/my-congresswoman-voted-against-nancy-pelosi-and-is-now-dead-to-me-eerie-daily-kos-hit-piece-on-gabrielle-giffords-just-two-days-before-assassination-attempt-on-her/
excellent find stinkle...
so when i wrote, "nidal malik hassan (did anyone put his name up in this thread yet?) was an anti-war murderer. not sure he fits nicely into the right wing tbagger camp, especially since he's a brown muslim, eh?", my hope was to draw your attention to the fact he doesn't fit what you have repeatedly tried to paint t-baggers as: white, christian, pro-war
sorry i wasn't clearer when i used those adjectives
ed:
uhh...i think dailykos is left-wing.
ain't google cache a bitch?
Last edited:
guess who did this?
more here for when you get cumdrunk from reading huffpo:
http://hillbuzz.org/2011/01/08/my-congresswoman-voted-against-nancy-pelosi-and-is-now-dead-to-me-eerie-daily-kos-hit-piece-on-gabrielle-giffords-just-two-days-before-assassination-attempt-on-her/
And the difference between that and what palin put up was.........come on.........you can do it..........
What's the difference? Because there definitely is one. Kind of a big one actually.
Here's a hint, taken from that page.
Now here's what palin had up.
Read what's on each. You can do it.
I have a particular friend on Facebook that holds me to a literal standard, specifically, I had posted a story about Cheney in the hospital for his heart condition, and made a joke about how "I'm praying...", implying that I was praying for his death.
A few months later I criticized people "praying" for Obama, a healthy 47 year old man who is targeted by every nutcase and terrorist, to die, and this friend called me on it.
I tried to explain that I was kidding about wanting to Cheney to pass on from natural causes vs an untimely and very likely violent end for Obama, but it made no difference in his eyes.
As for the Daily Kos vs Sarah Palin, it simply falls to perception. Is the Daily Kos known for its violent rhetoric and guns-guns-guns? Not really.
Is Sarah Palin known for this? Yes.
So I think all of us will have to be on alert for the language we use when discussing politics.
A few months later I criticized people "praying" for Obama, a healthy 47 year old man who is targeted by every nutcase and terrorist, to die, and this friend called me on it.
I tried to explain that I was kidding about wanting to Cheney to pass on from natural causes vs an untimely and very likely violent end for Obama, but it made no difference in his eyes.
As for the Daily Kos vs Sarah Palin, it simply falls to perception. Is the Daily Kos known for its violent rhetoric and guns-guns-guns? Not really.
Is Sarah Palin known for this? Yes.
So I think all of us will have to be on alert for the language we use when discussing politics.
Last edited:
Making Montashu's continuing deconstruction of comprehensible grammar a radical political statement?Skaredshtless is the government?
From down under,"Don't blame Palin." Must be VB ghost-writing.
for some people...it gets them through the night.
Hey, if any crazy left-wing zealot shoots a state with a bow and arrow, I'm TOTALLY holding the Democrats responsible...
hey, stinkle, with all the righty/lefty/teatard/same bunch of fascist dirty old men and women bs aside; is not a bit odd that 1 of Gifford's 2 ytube subscriptions is Loughner's? if it was a recent hack/crack why is it still up? Been there for two days now.
edit: his subscription was deleted from her page on 1/11/11 with still no explanation of why she was subscribed to him, and if hacked, why was he there on 1/8/11.
cached from 1/8/11, he's on the bottom left
edit: his subscription was deleted from her page on 1/11/11 with still no explanation of why she was subscribed to him, and if hacked, why was he there on 1/8/11.
cached from 1/8/11, he's on the bottom left
Last edited:
the interview with the little girl's parents last night was a little odd IMO. im assuming her death hadnt hit them yet, but they seemed so calm after just losing their daughter the day before
You must spread some reputation around before you can give it to $tinkle again.
"you never want a serious crisis to waste" - sarah tiberius palin
http://www.ridemonkey.com/forums/member.php?u=3976
Edit: Especially the selection about laughing at things others don't consider funny.
Also a good one, but the main difference to me is that palin's crap specifically mentions individual PEOPLE, with very specific elimination-esque terminology at the top of the page. Not states for points but specific individuals. Only way it could have been worse is with their pictures in the crosshairs in every state.Hey, if any crazy left-wing zealot shoots a state with a bow and arrow, I'm TOTALLY holding the Democrats responsible...
I don't think for a second this douche clicked on that page and then all of sudden had a great idea to go shoot someone. But it fits into a larger collection of firearm/second amendment/'solution' themes that is wholly and specifically coming from HIGH PROFILE leaders and figure heads on the right, and the right only (and whatever the hell that militia minded, gold hoarding bullshlt parading around as patriotism is these days....which is still trumpeted by the same people who all happen to be republicans). A few ramblings from registered democrats here and there along the same lines isn't even close to the same thing. Guys like ridetoofast, stinkle and sanjuro in his ongoing quest to be fair and balanced are delusional sitting here pretending it's even close.
Well yeah, I was implying that, but I guess it got missed. The Democrats used comical bow-and-arrow bullseye targets on states. Palin used rifle crosshairs on people. HUGE difference.
I found this yesterday, and I'm surprised I didn't post it here:
http://scienceblogs.com/tfk/2011/01/asking_why_without_the_blame_g.php
Obviously a normal, sane, rational person isn't going to see a violent political ad on tv and go out and start shooting people. However, it could be enough to push someone who's teetering on the brink of sanity over the edge... But overall the article is a great read.
Wait a sec, are you talking about me?
You're still letting $tinkle yank your chains? Anyone in the GOP could carve a live baby up like a thanksgiving turkey at halftime during the Superbowl on national television and feed it to whatever washed up singer they have entertaining the drooling masses, and he'd go into a diatribe about how teacher's unions support Democrats, so it's the same.
Look, a crazy person with a gun in a country full of crazy people with guns shot someone. It'll happen again, soon. Greatest country on earth!
Look, a crazy person with a gun in a country full of crazy people with guns shot someone. It'll happen again, soon. Greatest country on earth!
Last edited:
Hell man, I know plenty of people (yes in florida) who I'd consider 'sane' who over the last two years have started parroting this whole 'constitution getting raped'/'use muh gunn to protekt america frum the commies' crap that passes as freedom loving speech.
It's like the internet. Every stupid idea can find validation and support and now there's the perception that 'good' americans defend their political ideas with firearms and there's a huge nation wide support group where this kind of crap is not only sanctioned and accepted but outright promoted. You know it's not fiction when a friggin Arizona cop goes on record and criticizes the current rhetoric as being dangerous.