Quantcast

which one of these 3 tyres for rear use?

freeriding

Monkey
Jun 5, 2011
138
1
26in wheels.
aggressive rider.
all year round use.
best possible combination of grip and rolling resistance.

1. minion dhr ii 2.4 dual compound
i run the 2.3 dual and find it awesome.
i want a bit more cushion than the 2.3.
has the 2.4 much more volume/cushion than the 2.3?
will the 2.4 add much more rolling resistance?

2. maxxis aggressor 2.3
is it any good for light mud/slop?
from what i read, it's not a good tyre for non dry conditions.
does it have lots of volume/cushion? i laso read, that it is a bit skinny.
(unfortunately, i see that the 2.5 will not come for the 26 wheels)

3. nobby nic 2.35 speedgrip
is it any good for light mud/slop?
according to schwalbe, speedgrip is a huge upgrade compared to pacestar.
if it is true, this may be one of the best rear all year round tyres.

ps. i wanted to try out the WTB breakout, but it won't come out for 26 wheels.:wtf:
 

mykel

closer to Periwinkle
Apr 19, 2013
5,471
4,208
sw ontario canada
The NN is a decent rear tire on a trail bike, I have one now, but when it is done, it is gone.
Would def not use on a big bike.

Of your choices, DHR2 all the way.

DHR2's are top of the list for when I need more tire than the Mich WildRockr2 I'm currently loving.
 

djjohnr

Turbo Monkey
Apr 21, 2002
3,109
1,799
Northern California
Where I live the trails are bone dry blown out clay; super slippery if you even look at your brakes funny (which is why I like all the modulation I can get out of my brakes). I have friends that love the Aggressors in the spring, then bitch about blown out trails in the summer. Personally I just run full meats front and rear, currently Magic Marys, since I know when I stuff them into a destroyed corner they'll usually hold.
 

freeriding

Monkey
Jun 5, 2011
138
1
What about a 2.3 dhf dual in the rear?

I read that it rolls better than the dhr2, good grip in all conditions, it's just a bit worse than dhr2 in braking.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,785
5,603
Ottawa, Canada
What about a 2.3 dhf dual in the rear?

I read that it rolls better than the dhr2, good grip in all conditions, it's just a bit worse than dhr2 in braking.
given the use of Y to spell tyre, we can assume he's in the UK. given what the brits like to say about their riding, we can assume there's mud. DHF doesn't clear mud nearly as well as the DHR2.
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,047
783
A dhr2 c3 2.3 came on the back of my Spartan this year. I never thought it was possible to hate a tire so much. We ride on Conglomerate stone a lot around here. Picture broken concrete with jagged edges- some pebbles, some boulders the size of vehicles. My lines I've ridden for 10+ years can't be ridden the same way cause these tires SLIDE off of every damn rock they hit.

Don't hate me because of this... But Nevigals... Yes, Kenda Nevigals, handled better and more predictable than these POS tires.

I've never experienced a tire that slips off of a naturally jagged, sharp, pointy rock till I tried this. The front is a HR2 and I don't mind it. But I think since the dhr2 sucks so bad that I'm not giving the HR2 credit. I seriously consider reversing the tire so the ramps are backwards to try and help traction. Has anyone else done this?
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
A 2.3 anything maxxis is pretty pinner. There's also a slew of 'oem only' tires that maxxis has (white maxxis logo) that are what should be refered to as Walmart compound. They're certainly not 3C.

EC: you talking about climbing or descending here? Because if you turn that tire around so it climbs better, all you're going to do is give yourself that much joy and control on descents instead.
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,047
783
Both. It just slides off rocks. Our terrain is "rolly". You're rarely ever flat. You either climb 1k and descend 1k, or you hit a 10' steep shot followed by a 50' descent, 15 up... Any time these tires (C3 compound) touch rocks, up or down, you have to be ready to accommodate them sliding off. Even on tacky stone. If their Oe tires are for some reason made differently, but claim to be the same, shame on them for A) ruining their image and B) fooling the customer.

As a bike tire company though in this "small" industry where they stopped making high end 26" tires that were the standard for 40 years, why set up an OE run and a high end aftermarket run?

It could be C) me not liking this tire for some odd reason. But I'm pretty neutral with tires. I've never really ridden one that I didn't like. Panaracer, michelin, kenda, maxxis, Bontrager specialized... Except this dhr2.
 
Last edited:

ZHendo

Turbo Monkey
Oct 29, 2006
1,661
147
PNW
I've had nothing but luck with the DHR2. Running it front and rear on my trail bike (Knolly Warden Carbon), and it has been great in everything from early season snowmelt slop here in the PNW to the bone dry summer conditions we're currently experiencing. Wish I had gone with the WT casing for the added volume and beefier knobs, but really can't complain about the tire. Better grip across all conditions than Magic Mary (scary on wet roots / rocks) and DHF in my opinion.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Our terrain is "rolly". You're rarely ever flat. You either climb 1k and descend 1k, or you hit a 10' steep shot followed by a 50' descent, 15 up...
Dear god. Have you considered suicide? Other than the first part that sounds like the kind of riding that would turn me into a full time fisherman.



Couple things. It's 3C. And there are two of them. Maxxgrip, and maxxterra. There might even be a third that only shows up on their full on xc tires but those are the two that matter. The maxxgrip is (wait for it) grippier. The max terra are barely even a soft compound. They're a little better than what they call 'dual' so I guess they have a place.

The dhr2 is a legit tread but the 2.3s are pretty pinner like I said. On most rims they end up pretty round. But you're talking about slippery rocks so that's almost all compound, not tread design. Take a picture of your tire graphics. Seriously. And maxxis has done a lot of dumb shit the last few years but you can't fault them for not making 26" tires. They're actually releasing newer treads in 26, a lot more so than some other companies.

TLDR version: can it
 

Dogboy

Turbo Monkey
Apr 12, 2004
3,215
618
Durham, NC
I'd choose maxxterra over maxxgrip all day long for a trail bike/non-dh bike tire. 42a shoulders and a 50a center is plenty grippy and they wear amazingly well. I'm not sure what planet a Nevegal is better than a DHR2 on. A DHR2 made out of dog turds would grip better than a Nevegal.
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,047
783
Couple things. It's 3C. And there are two of them. Maxxgrip, and maxxterra. There might even be a third that only shows up on their full on xc tires but those are the two that matter. The maxxgrip is (wait for it) grippier.

But you're talking about slippery rocks so that's almost all compound, not tread design.
Maxx terra is what they are. File won't upload.
Not slippery rocks, extremely grippy rocks. People ride here after it rains and even during the winter with ice in the nooks and crannies. These tires suck.

Ps. Is variable terrain off limits to you?
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
Maxx terra is what they are. File won't upload.
Not slippery rocks, extremely grippy rocks. People ride here after it rains and even during the winter with ice in the nooks and crannies. These tires suck.

Ps. Is variable terrain off limits to you?
If you really have 3c tires that don't grip on 'grippy rocks' I'd suggest not riding through oil slicks any more.


Is that the term for 'shit that never goes downhill'.....varied terrain?

If so, then yeah I don't do that. In fact I moved 2500 miles specifically to not do that.


The 2.4 dhr2s are legit. They're far bigger than 0.1" bigger. But if you're buying something new anyway that's an even bigger pool to pull from.
 

kidwoo

Artisanal Tweet Curator
I'd choose maxxterra over maxxgrip all day long for a trail bike/non-dh bike tire. 42a shoulders and a 50a center is plenty grippy and they wear amazingly well. I'm not sure what planet a Nevegal is better than a DHR2 on. A DHR2 made out of dog turds would grip better than a Nevegal.
That stick-e stuff that kenda uses/used is actually pretty good. And sticking to rocks has way more to do with rubber than tread design.

But yeah those maxx terra tires are fine on trail bikes. They're just not as good as the very small handful of trailbike tires that made with the super tacky stuff. So I'm grumpy.
 

freeriding

Monkey
Jun 5, 2011
138
1
How does the aggressor compare to the vittoria morsa?
I read really good reviews on the morsa, and i think it is similar category to the aggressor!
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,065
10,630
AK
Yeah, definitely the schwalbe. Hans Dampf. Here's mine:
20430116_10101219640423008_5472868803352462651_n.jpg
20476080_10101219640168518_8148523204490915711_n.jpg
20476263_10101219639924008_898824408268384013_n.jpg
 

Electric_City

Torture wrench
Apr 14, 2007
2,047
783
After last night, trust me, the DHR2 is a massive piece of shit. On dry, rough stone it still found a way to slip out. Road tires would have gotten traction on this. No kidding.