Quantcast

Why did the US go after Iraq before we caught Bin Laden?

Discussion in 'Politics & World News' started by pixelninja, Nov 10, 2005.

  1. pixelninja

    pixelninja Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    This is something that has puzzled me for some time, but I've yet to find a real answer to. Maybe I'm looking at this all wrong and I'd like to hear from both the left and the right on this one. Didn't Bin Laden claim to be behind the 9-11 attacks? Didn't President Bush vow to track him down and not stop until he was brought to justice? Why then did we (meaning, the US gov't) decide to divert a majority of our military (and military spending) to Iraq before we had caught Bin Laden? Wouldn't the billions of dollars that we've spent in Iraq have been better served in this "war on terror" by pursuing Bin Laden and his organization?

    Personally, I don't have much of a problem with our invasion of Iraq. WMD or not, I think Saddam is a bastard and deserves what he got. What I do have a problem with is the timing. In my opinion, if Bush had single-mindedly hunted down Bin Laden and captured or killed him, this would have shown all the other terrorists in the world that we mean business. We would still have the support of the world that we had immediately after 9-11, and then we could have gone into Iraq and taken care of business.

    What am I missing? Did I miss a press conference on this? Has Bush ever given any reasons for giving more importance to Sadam and his now-fictional WMD than to the man who claimed responsibility for 9-11? I really must have missed something, because nobody seems to be talking about Bin Laden any more. Seems weird since he was the one who claimed responsibility for 9-11, not Saddam.
     

    Please register to disable this ad.

  2. sanjuro

    sanjuro Tube Smuggler

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,472
    Location:
    SF
    There really is no connection. Saddam Hussein was a secular dictator which did not support Al Queda in anyway. Bin Laden was a Saudi zealot who fought the Russians in Afganistan.

    It is not like Bin Laden has been forgotten, but obviously it is difficult to track down a man hiding in US-unfriendly countries.

    The only connection is the Axis of Evil, which is a Bush myth.
     
  3. pixelninja

    pixelninja Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    I would argue that Bin Laden HAS been forgotten, at least by our current adminstration. When was the last time Bush talked about the hunt for him?

    Once again, didn't Bush promise that he would not stop until Bin Laden had been captured? Hell, with our current situation in Iraq, we barely have enough resources to help with US disaster relief, much less hunt for a man hiding in unfriendly countries. I guess I just feel that if he had thrown as much money at trying to find BL as he has at Iraq, the bastard would have been caught by now.

    Makes me think this whole "war on terror" is a complete sham. Hmm. Go figure...
     
  4. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    ^ good summary. EDIT: Sanjuro's summary. Damn PN posted before me :blah:

    Another reason is that this admin had an agenda before it got into office... google "PNAC"

    They're two seperate subjects and finding Bin Laden WITH a massive military operation would require US to essentially "invade" every country, so it's not like an either/or situation.
     
  5. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    uhh, it is a sham. The war on terror is an excuse for this admin to conduct the activities it wants. If BL was caught, they'd have a hard time arguing for more military, homeland security, etc.

    If they really wanted to go after terrorism, they'd start in Saudi Arabia... who they're friends with.

    BL will become a topic again when the admin needs it's next diversionary tactic.

    You don't think Harriett Miers was anything but that, do you? She was there to distract us while the Libby indictment was going on. She "stole" headlines from that problem, then Bush got to distract us further when he appointed his next SCOTUS guy who is actually qualified.
     
  6. kidwoo

    kidwoo Celebrating No-Pants Day

    Rep/Likes:
    158 / 1,507
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    21,721
    Location:
    In my pants
    Dang. Where were you guys yesterday?

    Click on N8s thread about the libs blah blah
     
  7. pixelninja

    pixelninja Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    When we invaded Afghanistan in our hunt for BL, the world was behind us. I believe that if we'd continued this campaign, i.e. You hide BL, We Come and Kick Your Ass, the world would have continued to support us in our cause and we'd have the bastard by now.

    Bush could have then extended that to You Hide Terrorists, We Come and Kick Your Ass and he could have had his way with Iraq, regardless of his real intentions.
     
  8. fluff

    fluff Monkey Turbo

    Rep/Likes:
    3 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2001
    Messages:
    5,672
    Location:
    Feeling the lag
    I'm surprised anyone gave that thread the time of day...
     
  9. kidwoo

    kidwoo Celebrating No-Pants Day

    Rep/Likes:
    158 / 1,507
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    21,721
    Location:
    In my pants
    Well as usual n8 made one or two stupid non-answers but then got out of the way.

    I put some stuff in there about PNAC like opie done said.
     
  10. sanjuro

    sanjuro Tube Smuggler

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,472
    Location:
    SF
    Well, I can't argue with this. It is possible that Bin Laden has been forgotten...
     
  11. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    You're assuming that Bush wants to stop terrorism. I think they like the excuse. As for invading Iraq, I'm not sure there was enough evidence of their terrorist activities to go after them. Seems like yesterday's bombing -- which intiated in Iraq -- is the first noise on the subject loud enough to support action against Iraq.

    Besides, BL is Saudi's puppet and if we kill their puppet, they may get mad at us.

    I'm just thinking randomly, so I'm probably wrong. But let's just say that I think this admin is too smart and clever to have thought this through anyway than it is. I believe they like the direction it's going. Much distraction while the Cabal operates.
     
  12. pixelninja

    pixelninja Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    <sigh> Sadly, I don't think that Bush really wants to defeat terroristm. In fact, I think just the opposite. I guess this is really what I'm getting at. If Bush really cared about defeating terrorism, he would have continued the hunt for BL until captured. He didn't, so this tells me that he's more concerned with his own agenda than doing what's right for the American people, especially those who died on 9-11.

    It baffles me, though, that the Democrats haven't been harping on this constantly over the past few years. If I'd been in Kerry's shoes, I'd have been using this every chance I got. His campaign slogan could have been, "I'll get the bastard 'cause Bush won't!". He would have won in a landslide. Then again, Kerry is a career politician also, so I guess that's expecting too much from him also.

    I really need to lower my expectations of all politicians...
     
  13. N8 v2.0

    N8 v2.0 Not the sharpest tool in the shed

    Rep/Likes:
    18 / 149
    Joined:
    Oct 18, 2002
    Messages:
    11,008
    Location:
    The Cleft of Venus

    More likey dead.
     
  14. LordOpie

    LordOpie MOTHER HEN

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / 0
    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    21,033
    Location:
    Denver
    oh, that's cuz the Democrats are idiots.
     
  15. kidwoo

    kidwoo Celebrating No-Pants Day

    Rep/Likes:
    158 / 1,507
    Joined:
    Aug 25, 2003
    Messages:
    21,721
    Location:
    In my pants

    Word.

    "oh let's rise above and play nice" BS. Call negligence out and call it by it's name.

    Cowards.
     
  16. Changleen

    Changleen Paranoid Member

    Rep/Likes:
    1 / 4
    Joined:
    Jan 9, 2004
    Messages:
    9,890
    Location:
    Hypernormality
    Bush needs the spectre of terrorism to persue his agenda. No Osama = no public face of terror. Osama gets to live until Bush is out of office.

    Bush said he doesn't think about Osama much anymore. As you guys pointed out above, this shows the reality of the situation fairly well.
     
  17. sanjuro

    sanjuro Tube Smuggler

    Rep/Likes:
    7 / 0
    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    17,472
    Location:
    SF
    He's hiding...
     
  18. enkidu

    enkidu Guest

    Rep/Likes:
    0 / N/A
    Why did the US go after Iraq before we caught Bin Laden?

    Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Proliferation Brief, Vol. 6, Number 5 ("Origins of Regime Change in Iraq") gives a good history of pre-PNAC and beyond.

    http://deongates.com/xOriginsofRegimeChangeinIraq.htm
     
  19. pixelninja

    pixelninja Turbo Monkey

    Rep/Likes:
    4 / 0
    Joined:
    Jun 14, 2003
    Messages:
    2,131
    Location:
    Denver, CO
    And let me just state for the record, I think Clinton also dropped the ball on Bin Laden. al Qaeda did some henious sh*t on his watch.