Didn't he also say # 3, as well?Changleen said:5 is scary. Bush did actually say that. Freak.
Well, I think he wanted to make his old man proud. Where's N8? This thread is right up his alley...Ciaran said:Didn't he also say # 3, as well?
That's what kills me the most. The motherfuqqer and his minions will just walk away rich, fat and happy...ChrisRobin said:Worst thing is, he's going to get away with it.
ChrisRobin said:Funny how in 1994, in Africa, when one million people were butchered in within a period of three months, no one went to help...not even Canada! Stuff like that is right up our alley.
Well...I guess they need to discover oil for everyone to run over there to "save" the people.
What a joke. I'm sure there are people worst off compared to the so-called suppressed Iraqis. You'd think we would evolved beyond all of this. Worst thing is, he's going to get away with it.
There's no way I'm defending the UN...I know they sit back and when they do react, it's too late.N8 said:So did the UN blue-ribbon committee ever decide if there was genocide in the Sudan yet?
N8, as a republican, what's your official response?blt2ride said:Where's N8? This thread is right up his alley...
No, it's his new hairstyle....didn't work out too well this time. I've managed to obtain these exclusive pictures.stinkyboy said:He must be busy with a "martini mix-off" or something.
I'll wait...
[tumbleweed rolls by]
valve bouncer said:No, it's his new hairstyle....didn't work out too well this time. I've managed to obtain these exclusive pictures.
N8 is not a Republican, he is a Republican lap dog. Since his masters have avoided the question they can't tell him when to bark.stinkyboy said:N8, as a republican, what's your official response?
Westy said:N8 is not a Republican, he is a Republican lap dog. Since his masters have avoided the question they can't tell him when to bark.
Number of times Bush referred to WMD's and their like in that speach = 32N8 said:Sheesh... did your liberal ADD kick in too quickly?
http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2002/10/20021007-8.html
Westy said:Number of times Bush referred to WMD's and their like in that speach = 32
Number of WMD's found=0
That is largely due to the marketing campaign of the Bush Admin. It seems clear to me that Bush was hell bent on invading and used poor and dubious intelligence to mount his campaign. Intelligence analysts were pressured to provide reports showing the existance of WMD's not the truth. Would you spend your money building a pink and purple house because a friend of your neighbors cousin said he new a guy that would buy it?N8 said:Percent of world population who thought WMD's either existed to were soon to exist in post invasion Iraq = 99.99%
Westy said:That is largely due to the marketing campaign of the Bush Admin.
And our survey said:N8 said:Percent of world population who thought WMD's either existed to were soon to exist in post invasion Iraq = 99.99%
Africa is a long ways to go on horseback.ChrisRobin said:I guess what I'm trying to say is even Canada is to blame for not going to to the right places at the right time.
Clinton was not the one using Nukular or Weapons of mass destruction every third word for a year or two. So the Republicans thought Clinton was completely full of **** about everything except WMD's in Iraq? Didn't the weapons inspectors in Iraq find absolutely nothing while Bush was in office? Or maybe Bush just wanted to use old and outdated information to tickle his invasion woody? Intelligence reports show that Germany was trying to off the Jewish race in Europe, we should invade.N8 said:When you say Bush you mean Clinton right...??
Well, there are a certain amount of people who will believe anything that is shoved down their throat. On the other hand, there are people who use facts and evidence to make an educated decision. The problem, however, the gullible people will argue their point, and won't admit when they're wrong.Westy said:That is largely due to the marketing campaign of the Bush Admin. It seems clear to me that Bush was hell bent on invading and used poor and dubious intelligence to mount his campaign. Intelligence analysts were pressured to provide reports showing the existance of WMD's not the truth. Would you spend your money building a pink and purple house because a friend of your neighbors cousin said he new a guy that would buy it?
Well said.Reactor said:Funny, that containment strategy Clinton had, the one Bush said had failed miserably, it turns out it was actually working. Iraq had no real chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. The only WMD found were a couple of 20 year old VX shells. They couldn't even get aluminum tubing to make rockets out of.
We found one actual terrorist, but we created thousands.
We took a stable country, with a government we didn't like, and replaced it with an unstable country, with a government we won't like.
We took those long suffering Iraqi people, and managed to get a lot of them killed, either as collateral damage, by insurgents, or by lack of sanatation and medical care after the invasion.
We took a socially progressive country, with reasonable treatment of women, and are replacing it with an islamic republic.
We took those brutal prisons with torture chanbers, and used them.
Yeah. George did good. Real Good.
Yes, but at least he was DECISIVE in destroying a country and creating more terrorists!Reactor said:Yeah. George did good. Real Good.
And in 10 years the US will have to re-invade Iraq for all the reasons listed above. Hey, gotta keep those defense contractors happy by creating a new war every decade.Reactor said:Funny, that containment strategy Clinton had, the one Bush said had failed miserably, it turns out it was actually working. Iraq had no real chemical, biological or nuclear weapons. The only WMD found were a couple of 20 year old VX shells. They couldn't even get aluminum tubing to make rockets out of.
We found one actual terrorist, but we created thousands.
We took a stable country, with a government we didn't like, and replaced it with an unstable country, with a government we won't like.
We took those long suffering Iraqi people, and managed to get a lot of them killed, either as collateral damage, by insurgents, or by lack of sanatation and medical care after the invasion.
We took a socially progressive country, with reasonable treatment of women, and are replacing it with an islamic republic.
We took those brutal prisons with torture chanbers, and used them.
Yeah. George did good. Real Good.
I Are Baboon said:Yes, but at least he was DECISIVE in destroying a country and creating more terrorists!
[/sarcasm]
Morning N8, this site's for you: http://members.shaw.ca/spudnewt/sierranaked.jpg/badluck.swfN8 said:I don't know... they are forming a new constitution at the moment as a free people.
This is great news. It will finally put an end to all the suicide bombings and fighting and the terrorists/insurgents will see the error of their ways.N8 said:I don't know... they are forming a new constitution at the moment as a free people.
Horses? Due to budget cuts the horses were replaced with donkeys.BeerDemon said:Africa is a long ways to go on horseback.