Same here.douglas said:I hate walmart because:
1)the store is always a mess
2)half the time the item I want is diplayed, but they dont have any
3)there always is a long wait to check out
4)most employees are not pleasant or helpful
Same here.douglas said:I hate walmart because:
1)the store is always a mess
2)half the time the item I want is diplayed, but they dont have any
3)there always is a long wait to check out
4)most employees are not pleasant or helpful
Didn't mean to single you out with that...I Are Baboon said:
Where did I mention the physical appearance of the people who shop there?
My point is, no matter what Walmart I've been in, the shopping experience has sucked.
This is true.ThePriceSeliger said:It's trendy to hate walmart.
SS! great point.SkaredShtles said:Interesting view. Replace WT with the "N" word and see how it sounds.
I too don't particularly care to shop at certain Wal-Marts for those people stated.....too many people with their heads up their a**, not paying attention to what they're doing, letting their kids run around like wild animals, waiting in line for 20 mins while said kids run into me. :mumble: No different than how I feel about the yuppies sometimes at IKEA who walk around acting like they are gods gift to the world and can be as rude as they want. This type of stuff has nothing to do with me not wanting to be around people of other races, etc....it's me not wanting to be annoyed and feel the urge to pull out a gun and go postal on someone!!! So, in general I just try to avoid crowded shopping places.N8 said:Of course those could easily be code words for other races too...
Oppression complete.Echo said:I do have to give N8 a few clever points. Based on the title of this thread, several people have owned up to being idiots.
It probably belongs in the PD forum, I was hoping to make it further into 2006 before I had to start oppressing though.
caputo1989 said:Same here.
My New Years Resolution for 2006, right after doing a solo 24, is to let JBP be the mod that everyone hates this yearjohnbryanpeters said:Oppression complete.
A mockumentry...Sorgie said:http://www.walmartmovie.com/
I saw this movie about a month ago. It's pretty good. I expected a blatantly biased flick, but I was pleasantly surprised. It's very well put together. If it comes to your area you should try to see it.
I wonder if the DVD sells well enough if Walmart will carry itSorgie said:http://www.walmartmovie.com/
I saw this movie about a month ago. It's pretty good. I expected a blatantly biased flick, but I was pleasantly surprised. It's very well put together. If it comes to your area you should try to see it.
Who cares? Wal-Mart can buy toothpaste from anyone so if you want to sell to them, then you have to play by their rules.Archslater said:I'm suprised no one has pointed out what Walmart does to their suppliers.
From Wikipedia: "With Wal-Mart's supreme buying position, it business relations with suppliers are at times best described as a vigorously monopsonistic. In its negotiations with suppliers, Wal-Mart requires that prices go down from year to year. If a vendor does not comply with Wal-Mart's request for reduced prices, they risk having their entire brand removed from Wal-Mart's shelves in favor of a lower-priced competitor or a less expensive store brand. This can put pressure on suppliers to shift jobs to factories in third world countries or reduce the quality of the product. A CEO of one of Wal-Mart's suppliers said that the price Wal-Mart requested from his company for a particular product was so low that he couldn't afford to keep production in America, even if he didn't have to pay his workers anything."
johnbryanpeters said:Oppression complete.
Wish I could, sweetheart, but strangely enough I can move the thread here but cannot modify it after that.N8 said:Be a darling now, since we are in the bowels of RM, and change back the thread's title to the original.
It's called competition. Pressure sucks, but it often brings out the best in people.Archslater said:I'm suprised no one has pointed out what Walmart does to their suppliers.
**** em. Poor people are lazy. Goddamn white trash meth head walmart shoppers should all be sterilized so I don't have to pay property tax to send their cough syrup drinking kids to school (until they get pregnant at 12 and drop out, anyways.)N8 said:So basically people hate Wal-Mart largly because of the people who shop there? Nice! Way to be tolerant of those less fortunate than you are...
N8, you are playing devil's advocate and this is fun and all, but your arguments are self-centered, short-sighted, and so full of BS I just had to roll up my pants.N8 said:Who cares? Wal-Mart can buy toothpaste from anyone so if you want to sell to them, then you have to play by their rules.
Besides, moving factories to some 3rd World country isn't a bad thing. That kid that used to work for $1/month out in some rice paddy in the heat and rain can now work inside a plant out of the weather for $20/month.. and we the American consumer can get inexpensive tee shirts.
Its is win-win.
quote of the day.OGRipper said:This is fun but I have to go get a Starbucks coffee so I am energized for my trips to Walmart and Ikea before I go to the Mega-plex to see a movie I read about in a magazine I got at Borders, then after that maybe we'll go to Chili's for some "ethnic" food and then to Hooters for a night cap...
Now, guess what part of the country I'm in?
Nah, nothing wrong here.
We idiots hate Wal-mart because it has a habit of treating its employees poorly, putting people out of business, and severely exploiting overseas workers. I want nothing more than to see Wal-mart's business strategy obliterated, and I boycott it because I cannot morally justify shopping there.N8 said:Why do idiots hate Wal-Mart?
Here's a company that sells stuff people want to buy at a price people want to pay. what's wrong with that?
So why all the blind hatred? Is it because Wal-Mart is so sucessful and some people can't stand sucess? Or is it just trendy?
Don't kid yourself. Cutting down prices yearly does nothing good for the vendors or their employees.Besides, moving factories to some 3rd World country isn't a bad thing. That kid that used to work for $1/month out in some rice paddy in the heat and rain can now work inside a plant out of the weather for $20/month.. and we the American consumer can get inexpensive tee shirts.
the n8 spoke.N8 said:So basically people hate Wal-Mart largly because of the people who shop there? Nice! Way to be tolerant of those less fortunate than you are...
You and N8 seem to miss the bigger picture issue: Quality of life can't be quantified as a "net benefit to the pocketbook." But maybe you and N8 equate quality of life with "size of bank account" and nothing else. In areas where Walmarts are forcing people out of business, most of the anti-Walmart people are perfectly willing to pay a little more to keep some character in their communities. In my (maybe harsh) opinion it's only short-sighted, cheap and self-centered bastards who are brainwashed into thinking having more stuff equals success, who are not.Toshi said:1. "keep money in the community". show me the peer reviewed study that demonstrates a net benefit to the consumer's pocketbook through shopping at smaller stores.
Holy cow is that place dangerous on your wallet!kidwoo said:I...absolutely love costco.
I've been oppressed by Websense.H8R said:
At work?I Are Baboon said:I've been oppressed by Websense.
OGRipper said:You and N8 seem to miss the bigger picture issue: Quality of life can't be quantified as a "net benefit to the pocketbook." But maybe you and N8 equate quality of life with "size of bank account" and nothing else. In areas where Walmarts are forcing people out of business, most of the anti-Walmart people are perfectly willing to pay a little more to keep some character in their communities. In my (maybe harsh) opinion it's only short-sighted, cheap and self-centered bastards who are brainwashed into thinking having more stuff equals success, who are not.
Doobie time?kidwoo said:N8
If by "trendy and hip" you mean "researched and opinionated appropriately", you have a point.
You're not interested in information however. That's why you post the drivel that you do.
Wrap your brain around this: I despise walmart and absolutely love costco. Could not be forced kicking and screaming into the first but gladly spend thousands annually at the second (and never at walmart's version sam's club).
I would tell you why, since it has nothing to do with such trite malice arising from some business' success, but like I said, I know you're impervious to such a diatribe and you'll just respond with one or more of ridemonkey's assortment of little animated smilies.
Actually, you'll do it now anyway.
Wal-Mart proudly touts that it saves consumers money by forcing suppliers to cut the fluff and get competitive. For most clock-punching employees of Wal-Mart’s stores, warehouses, and suppliers, however, lower prices equal lower wages.
The recent raid of Wal-Mart stores by federal agents yielded 300 illegal employees of the cleaning companies under contract with Wal-Mart. Racketeering charges have been filed on the immigrants’ behalf against the cleaning vendors and Wal-Mart. The suit claims Wal-Mart managers were aware of workers’ illegal alien status and cooperated with cleaning contractors to demand extra hours without extra pay.
Wal-Mart benefits from its lower-cost vendors, who manufacture many Wal-Mart products in Mexico, China, and Bangladesh. Laborers in these factories frequently work more than 80 hours per week for a few dollars a day. These factories are the reason apparel-maker Levi Strauss is closing its last U.S. manufacturing facilities this year. After 150 years of making jeans at 60 U.S. factories, Levi’s will sell only imported jeans and has introduced a low-price line at Wal-Mart in hopes of saving its failing business. When manufacturing jobs float overseas, many U.S. workers turn to one of Wal-Mart’s 1.3 million jobs—not much of a consolation prize.
Most "full-time" Wal-Mart employees don’t see 40-hour weeks and, at an average of $7.50 per hour, barely make enough to shop at their own stores. While Wal-Mart is the largest U.S. employer, it is also one of the most controversial, as current domestic labor disputes reveal. For instance, the United Food and Commercial Workers union in Southern California is protesting Wal-Mart’s incoming "supercenters," which will undercut existing retailers in the area.
MEANWHILE, WAL-MART steers employees away from unions, resorting to extremes when necessary. After Wal-Mart opened its first supercenters nationwide, meat workers frustrated by low pay, lousy benefits, and abusive treatment voted themselves into the first successful union presence at Wal-Mart. Wal-Mart responded by closing all of its fresh-meat departments and eliminating those jobs.
Almost 1.5 million current and former female employees are suing Wal-Mart in California’s largest sex-discrimination case in history. The plaintiff’s case, according to Fortune magazine, shows that as Wal-Mart "associate" rank increases, the number of female employees decreases, and that men’s salaries are consistently higher than women’s salaries at all employment levels. Wal-Mart spokesperson Mona Williams told Fortune, "We’ve spent so much time making sure we had a world-class distribution system and supplier network that we probably did not pay as much attention to making sure we got the personnel stuff right." Wal-Mart is now busy trying to change its public image, but Wal-Mart needs more than a makeover. It needs accountability.
Who provides both power and conscience to Wal-Mart? Shoppers and shareholders, so far, have consented that lower prices and more stores are more important than honorable vendor and employment standards. It is inconceivable that Wal-Mart, king of counting the financial cost, is unaware of the human cost of wage levels and working conditions in its suppliers’ businesses. Wal-Mart’s power comes with responsibility to pay just wages. With hundreds of thousands of Wal-Mart employees below poverty-level income, corporate contributions to community and charity are not enough.