Ha....those crazy brits...didn't even notice that. I guess I'm too sheltered by the FCC...Tits a good picture!!!! Nipple you very much.
Ha....those crazy brits...didn't even notice that. I guess I'm too sheltered by the FCC...Tits a good picture!!!! Nipple you very much.
and then this: http://www.centurychina.com/wiihist/njmassac/rape.htm (graphic images possibly NSFW)NEWSWEEK: But today's military is just as much about brains as brawn.
Kingsley Browne, author of "CO-ED Combat": Brawn clearly still matters. Soldiers today are often carrying at least 60 pounds of gear. That doesn't even include food, water, batteries. That's huge. Remember the EP3 spy plane that got shot down over China? The pilot weighed 220 pounds. He said it took every ounce of his strength just to keep the plane steady.
NW: Women aren't generally as physically strong as men. What about psychologically?
Browne: Women are suffering post-traumatic stress disorder at higher rates than men. We know that women in general feel more negative emotional consequences from physical aggression. Surveys show that women in the military, especially enlisted women, don't want to go into combat. The percentage of women enlistees is going down, and that seems to be tied to their exposure to combat. [-- is this where we get "suck it up, princess"?]
NW: What "new evidence" are you offering to show that women aren't fit for war?
Browne: The evidence comes from the field of evolutionary psychology, which recognizes that the human mind is a product of our evolutionary history. The reason men don't like women comrades in dangerous situations is they don't trust them when the shooting starts, and that is probably because women don't possess whatever cues evoke trust in men. And trust is central to combat cohesion. Men don't say, "This is a person I would follow through the gates of hell." Men aren't hard-wired to follow women into danger. It is largely an emotional reaction.
NW: When African-Americans were integrating the armed services there were lots of similar-sounding arguments about unit cohesion.
Browne: The reasons that people oppose women in combat are much more clearly tied to biological, not social, difference. The integration of the races in the military has been fairly successful. The integration of women is much more difficult, and there is a lot of reason to think that the problem is intractable.
is that you, john wayne?Are you serious? Seriously? Well, Im being serious. Youre a moron.
i wouldn't call that number "a lot", but i've seen it on CNNHave you done a lot of patrols around Baghdad with women?
how many women went into the '04 battle of fallujah in to clear out the rats' nest? of these, how many were "door knockers"? i suspect disproportionately few, which if true, would speak to the confidence from the leadership in females in true offensive combat situations, not just greeting passersby with "as-salamu alaikum" in the market. i also suspect leadership among strike teams is a little out of proportion. if i'm wrong in my assumptions (which are based upon the last few years reading blogs, talking to people who have served, media interviews, etc.), please convince me otherwise. alternatively, you can call me an ass, or some other flavor of the day.Serve a lot of time in a mixed-gender unit? As a male, tried to search a female Iraqi?
wtf does this mean? if he's "less of a man" (i assume you're calling him a tiptoe-through-the-tulips fatass), how exactly does that make a woman look by comparison? is the strongest woman equal to an avg man? is this the standard?A) Not every pilot is 220 lbs, and an EP3 Orion pilot isnt exactly a fighter pilot.
are the fitness standards the same for male & female?I would like to see what his 220 lbs consisted of. From a medical standpoint there is no difference in the muscle fiber between men and women.
i don't doubt this one bit. in most mtb races i've done, both short track & endurance, i've been passed & beaten by women. so please don't think i'm saying there's an imaginary line along the strength continuum whereby the weakest man is on one side, and the strongest woman on the other. i hope we can recognize the sexes aren't equal, yet there's significant overlap of performers when rank-ordered by capability, performance, and potential. once this is determined, it's not a stretch to see the draw to accepting (or even courting) females to a combat role.There are some weak-ass male Soldiers out there who have a hard time humping around their gear. After a few months, your legs get very strong. That applies to females too.
is this your "leave britney alone" speech?Ill tell you what, come on over here and I will introduce to some of the best officers that I know, who are female. After they beat the **** out of you, show you how professional and dedicated they are, and that their Soldiers would follow them to hell and back, then you can come on here and bad-mouth them. Because they actually volunteered to serve their country, and you havent (though you reap the benefits of your citizenship), I will put you in touch with them, and you can tell them why they arent fit for combat and why you can post stuff about them while knowing nothing.
no, this just one aspect, one scenario, one variety, as you've pointed out. to make the leap that i used an equal sign when addressing one example is lazy. i used the example of a small offensive unit to bring into question why they are always male. if females are every bit as effective as males, why do our leaders insist on the status quo? you seem very fired up to the plight of the combat-ready woman. are you willing to put your career (and some would also add "your life") at risk by seeking to represent elite teams proportionately?Your definition of Combat
- You imply that combat means kicking in doors.
don't tell me you buy into this "propaganda", too!And statistically, convoys and other soft targets are hit more than infantry or armor platoons. Why, because if you were a bad guy, which one would you rather go after. It must because one has more females in it. They can smell the estrogen and that means an easy target I guess.
as fun as it would be to bloody you up with this, i'll go ahead and make the leap that you believe the sexes are complimentary - the male making up for what the female lacks & vice versa. if true, again i bring you back to why don't we have equal representation among all strata of combat roles? wouldn't that make the most effective fighting team? the sexes arent equal
- I hope you have more to back this up than the shoddy evidence you present here. They are equal, just different.
i would bet a month's pay you wouldn't say that if we agreed with one anotherLeave Britney alone
No, that is my keep your mouth shut about things you don't know about speech. Compiling a list of media, that have similar trains of thought, and then thinking you can speak as an expert makes you the moron.
Your statements have no credibility based on the fact you are taking second hands reports and regurgitating them.
i never made these black & white statements, but did draw out compelling points from the newsweek interview. you can reasonably infer them to be appealing to me, and at the same time i can recognize the validity of your points (once i peel away the tampon-slinging cuntiness, of course). i'd like to discuss this, but am prepared to fling poo with the best of themYour position: Women have no place in combat. Women are inferior to men.
if i did, that would be the first time. did you even read that part about me admitting getting pwnd race-after-race?Then you can come back here and talk trash about how females suck all you want.
It's working for me right now.
Mud girl, I couldn't agree with you more! I mean EVERYone knows, all the best chefs in the world are men! :biggrin:Because I have a vagina I have to be a cook on the back line?
Hope she returns safely N8.
thx... i'm sure she'll be ok.. they have been drilling for months for their missionBeing on the road isn't the safest work, but they've got the TTPs pretty well down out there. Again, best thoughts to her.
There was no time to think, or even register fear, when a rocket-propelled grenade ripped into a Humvee and detonated in the drivers lap.
All I knew is: It was hot, I couldnt see and I couldnt breathe, said Cpl. Helen L. Ruhl, one of four soldiers injured in the Sept. 24 blast in eastern Afghanistan.
Yet Ruhl could and did manage to act.
Despite her own injuries, the 24-year-old Fort Carson medic is credited with helping to save the drivers life by stanching his bleeding and then returning fire on insurgents as her comrade was taken away for treatment.
She received a Bronze Star for valor Wednesday in a ceremony on Fort Carson. Its the militarys fourth highest award for valor.
The driver lost a leg but may not have survived without Ruhls quick thinking, a top commander said.
Shes the kind of medic I would like to have on a combat patrol, Fort Carson Deputy Commanding General for
Support Brig. Gen. James Pasquarette said after pinning Ruhl with the award.
New Geneva convention. Only allowable weapons: pillows and baby oil. Only combatents: women 18-28 years old. Tickle torture acceptable.
in the 5 yrs & 348 prev posts, i'm not sure we considered that.two words, Jessica Lynch.
i didnt feel like searching through all the pages, but thanksin the 5 yrs & 348 prev posts, i'm not sure we considered that.
+rep!
i just saw a tv special about her. she did become surprisingly hot. back when it happened.....eh not so muchSo hawt...
fagi just saw a tv special about her. she did become surprisingly hot. back when it happened.....eh not so much
strapped onto a stripped wet bed frame while hooked up to 840 cold cranking amps doesn't do it for you?i just saw a tv special about her. she did become surprisingly hot. back when it happened.....eh not so much