I guess it must be fair to say that Avalanche is in fact using MX techonology
http://www.avalanchedownhillracing.com/xr50chubie.html
http://www.avalanchedownhillracing.com/xr50chubie.html
heikkihall said:Avalanche has been making motorcycle suspension for longer than they have been in the Bike industry. They started out as a motocross suspension maker named C-Cycle, which was I believe later sold off so they could focus on mountain bike stuff.
The first Avalanche shock I saw years back had C-Cycle stickers on it....heikkihall said:Avalanche has been making motorcycle suspension for longer than they have been in the Bike industry. They started out as a motocross suspension maker named C-Cycle, which was I believe later sold off so they could focus on mountain bike stuff.
50 years or so.... But who's counting?Jm_ said:Of course, Marzocchi has been making MX stuff for a little while too...
There is a post at 50riders.com that might need some AVY Fan Support.seismic said:I guess it must be fair to say that Avalanche is in fact using MX techonology
http://www.avalanchedownhillracing.com/xr50chubie.html
Only if I can tell you what I REALLY think about boxxers.zedro said:can we get back on track and bask on how great Avy is?
Craig Seekins said:Yes, we hope to have a 6-7 inch fork available in a couple of months also.
...there's a reason that there is no market for inverted single crowns...Jimmy_Pop said:I would love for Avalanche to come out with an inverted single crown in 5" 6" or 7" sizes. How sick would that be ?
joel
why, cause Avy doen't make one ?binary visions said:...there's a reason that there is no market for inverted single crowns...
Maybe so, but Avalanche stands above the rest.Showa said:Lots of companies use mx technology
avy, marzocchi,foes, white brothers ect.
they arent naturally prone to breakage, the are torsionally flexy because they dont have an arched lower. They suffer the same thing as inverted DCs, which BTW, arent prone to breakage.Bullitboyz said:and if it's still going to be prone to breakage by nature blah blah...
And why is that?Kanter said:I wish AVY just made a 7-8" dual crown. I just dont like inverted forks.
I have ridden more inverted forks than non. You do notice more rigidity with a conventional fork, but with small bumps the USD fork is far superior. There is not as much flax as one would think and as its get greater in its travel it really stiffens up. I actually like the overall feel of the USD fork over the conventional, yes you need to be more cautious with the lowers, but in the long run its worth it.Kanter said:What is the reason that you speak of? Enlighten us. I am a mear grasshopper when it comes to inverted forks. Please tell us master.
Upside-down. Just the conventional fork guards is all you need. I ran my WB DH<2 without guards when I first got the inverted type back in 1999, then went over the bars scratched the right stanchion, after that I always used guards.Kanter said:What does USD stand for anyway? I understand it the inverted.
What is the best protection you can get for inverted. Do they make a product that protects better than the rest?
What's the reason for all the double chin fat guys wearing fox sweatshirts and baseball hats all crooked? Superior insulation system?neversummersnow said:There is after all a reason that all motos use inverted forks, it's superior in my opinion...
I did notice a huge difference as the 888 was stiff going down lower Karpiel, but just never cared for it on the smaller bumps.kidwoo said:What's the reason for all the double chin fat guys wearing fox sweatshirts and baseball hats all crooked? Superior insulation system?
Steering though rocks never happens on moto tracks. To me that's the one disadvantage of inverted forks. Regardless of how much people scream "myth", they twist easier. If I rode my mountain bike on a big bmx track, I'd have not problem with inverted forks either.
I do agree that for some reason, inverted forks (especially shivers) seem really supple over chattery stuff than most non inverted designs.
Finally rode it today, even though I've been totally sick all week, Feels just awesome!!!!! I just need to adjust the huge weight difference on the front end now.seismic said:So Brian...did you have some time on the Avy...and how was it ??
in theory USD forks should be more responsive to the small stuffseismic said:I think USD forks in general feels much nicer than non-USD forks. They seem (IMO) to respond better to the smal stuff...but that might just be a feeling !
Yup that's the fact. That is why they are so widely used in MX. The USD design has less moving mass. Which required less force to start movement. This gives you a quicker responding fork. I would love to ride a Avy fork.RaID said:in theory USD forks should be more responsive to the small stuff
because of the lower unsprung weight of the fork compared
to a conventional design
tazzmenn said:Yup that's the fact. That is why they are so widely used in MX. The USD design has less moving mass. Which required less force to start movement. This gives you a quicker responding fork. I would love to ride a Avy fork.
There was a bit of adjustment required when I first threw a leg over the Shivers I have now. They respond way different then a super t.