Maybe that is why they asked when a girl becomes a woman. They know it's wrong for boys to hit women, but girls are fair game.lovebunny said:
They hate us because we're beautiful.lovebunny said:...but why would they single out guys
Uhm - stosh, I though you were in NY.gigapower said:I called them about my wife, they told me to get some balls....if they could only see the tears.
uh no...still some work to be done about this one...Dlovebunny said:she is allways talking about equality for women and such.
women can hold any job they want.
lovebunny said:its kinda sexist. last time i checked it wasnt just guys who abuse there spouses. yes i know the majority are guys but why would they single out guys
Reactor said:I notice the way that it purposely refers to males an females in two different manners males are "boys", females are "women", so the subtext is implying men who hit women are childish, while females are somehow special, revered and deserving of an elevated level of respect.
or get firefox + adwatchPonySoldier said:Become a Premium Member and you won't have to worry about the sexist ads..
Or shut up until you figure out what's happening...likwid said:or get firefox + adwatch
zing!
Reactor said:If the add had just against domestic violence, an area where women are quickly catching up with men, I wouldn't have a problem with it.
lovebunny said:its kinda sexist. last time i checked it wasnt just guys who abuse there spouses. yes i know the majority are guys but why would they single out guys
laura said:its a banner add that supports domestic violence education at an early age. some of you guys on this board (not repack in particular) are just as, if not more touchy than feminists. how about we don't get pissed off that there are banner adds supporting domestic violence education, and get more pissed off that there is a need for one.
laura said:no, what it is saying is teach your male child (or boy) that viollence against women (grown up girls) is wrong. you can't very well teach a grown man who beats his wife that violence against women is wrong. as well, you don't have to mayn four year olds beating the **** out of their "girlfriends". it's called preventative measure. its also sponsored by the FAMILY VIOLENCE PREVENTION FUND. the end of the banner add says "teach early".
its a banner add that supports domestic violence education at an early age. some of you guys on this board (not repack in particular) are just as, if not more touchy than feminists. how about we don't get pissed off that there are banner adds supporting domestic violence education, and get more pissed off that there is a need for one.
Yeah. I think it's bull$hit.laura said:i wouldn't argue this any further but you are definitely going to have to back this statement up.
Sadly I think you are right. I see more and more violent girls these days. I know that when I was growing up my sister could hit me all day long and it was OK. As soon as I smacked her back I was feeling the leather of my dads belt on my backside. Today my sister is violent and short tempered, especially when she doesn't get her way. We don't talk much these days.lovebunny said:i agree with reactor. except about the women catching up thing. im not sure about that. any of you who know about my childhood know that i am against any violence against women and children. but i was kind of offended that its targeted at men only. and if we only edjucate boys on domestic abuse then the girls will be catching up soon. and all through elementary school theyre taught that boys cant hit them. they take it as we are allowed to hit boys but they cant hit us back, and if they do theyll just get in trouble. ive allways thought this was a messed up system before because i didnt like getting hit and now because i understand what raising a child this way can do.
True there are laws in place, but it can still be quite the uphill battle. Some comments/actions can be subltly enough that an outside opinion can twist the meaning, and without an HR department that's protecting the higher ups it becomes even harder. Not to mention if you work in a small industry word of things travels very very fast.lovebunny said:but im just curious, in our society, we have established that equality have we not? women can vote, women can hold any job they want. and if they are discriminated against because they're women, theres laws to protect them.
Equality has not been established in our society. Look at the number of top jobs and offices held by men, the lack of women-specific benefits in the office world(though that is getting better), pay levels for the same jobs, etc. Internationaly the women's movement is huge. While you think things may be peachy in the US(and it has gotten better), abroad women are still being treated as property. In the past few years the feminist movement has been focused on places like China, countries in Africa, India, and the Middle East(to name a few spots) in hopes of pressuring government and the people to fight for women's rights.lovebunny said:your post reminded me of this girl at my school. shes a feminist and for some reason thinks all guys are out to get her. and she also is active in womens rights. she is allways talking about equality for women and such. but im just curious, in our society, we have established that equality have we not? women can vote, women can hold any job they want. and if they are discriminated against because they're women, theres laws to protect them. so what rights are they fighting for?
i WONDER!!! why that is. look at all the dribble coming out of hollyweird promoting the TOUGH CHICK syndrome. we as a culture glorify violence in all its forms and now it has spilled over into the xx gene pool.erastusboy said:There was just a big article in time or newsweek that was all about a rise in female violence. It focused mainly on high schoolers beating the crap out of each other, but there were a bunch of interesting "female violence on the rise" facts.