Quantcast

WWIII thread

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,251
22,280
Sleazattle
Not sure to what extent to trust this but there is hard evidence of Russian military setting up offensive equipment at the plant and totally on form.

 

StiHacka

Compensating for something
Jan 4, 2013
21,560
12,509
In hell. Welcome!
Not sure to what extent to trust this but there is hard evidence of Russian military setting up offensive equipment at the plant and totally on form.

Just came to post this here. If the fuckers cause another Chernobyl, it should be retaliated with tactical nuclear attack on russian positions in russia.

1659969836652.png
 

StiHacka

Compensating for something
Jan 4, 2013
21,560
12,509
In hell. Welcome!
List of putin's scum buddies

 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,400
10,876
AK
Looks like old ass Mig 27s or 23s for the most part. Can't tell what that is on the left. Possibly 29 or Su-27 variants, or something a lot older. Wing doesn't seem delta-enough though.
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,400
10,876
AK
Bunch of Su-25s here: 46.05804920714533, 38.23663057762209
These ones look like trainers: 45.87792898759418, 40.099872590163095
Su-35s and Fulcrums: 48.95242229238131, 40.303553961011275
Assorted Su-27s and 35s, Fulcrum or two, some "rare" Su-34 "fatties": 51.75125001935318, 36.29390769737633
Half the Russian air force: 52.63677542593497, 39.460705364983
Fulcrums and Flankers: 44.97408249289283, 41.10804084468858
Can't tell with just one type present, Fulcrums?: 44.9603778733657, 37.996042440218794
 
Last edited:

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,400
10,876
AK
Bunch of Su-25s here: 46.05804920714533, 38.23663057762209
These ones look like trainers: 45.87792898759418, 40.099872590163095
Su-35s and Fulcrums: 48.95242229238131, 40.303553961011275
Assorted Su-27s and 35s, Fulcrum or two, some "rare" Su-34 "fatties": 51.75125001935318, 36.29390769737633
Half the Russian air force: 52.63677542593497, 39.460705364983
Fulcrums and Flankers: 44.97408249289283, 41.10804084468858
Can't tell with just one type present, Fulcrums?: 44.9603778733657, 37.996042440218794
Course, it's not real-time, but it's from just a few months ago...so current with the "surround the Ukraine" campaign.
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
20,400
10,876
AK
Almost as old as the F16's.....
F-16 is 5 years younger, but at least a generation ahead when it was introduced, not to mention now. By the time we were introducing the F-16 we realized swing-wing was a dumb idea. Except for the B-1...except, that was canceled for being dumb...but "brought back to life" for sunk cost, jerbs and stuff.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
56,251
22,280
Sleazattle
If it's a HIMARS/MLRS JED/JEL round (bomblets), there's a good chance the planes that "look intact" are swiss-cheese up close. Such is the dispersion pattern with that.
There is a lot of speculation as what was used as on paper the Ukrainians have nothing with the range to perform that attack. However there were a handful of large craters sighted so it was probably single munitions. Probably safe to assume than any airplane that hasn't already flown out of there is damaged.