No way, i see pictures i know what I see. Just because you have spoken to yeti and have more information than me in no way makes you more qualified than me to talk about the design and all it's obvious flaws(so do you need a deposit now?)James | Go-Ride said:Actually you can tell if a bike will be progressive based on a drawing, it's not very difficult (although with this particular bike, I do think having an engineering background would help a bit). With a regular bike, it's pretty easy to tell whether or not the bike is going to be progressive, whatever link / member drives the shock will give it away pretty easily. If the link that pushes the shock starts at an acute angle to the shock, and the shock bottoms at or before 90' to the link, that's a pretty good indicator that the bike will be progressive.
However, with this bike, you don't really have that rule-of-thumb guideline to figure it out. Like Krispy mentioned, it has to do with shaft speed which is less determinable without a workign prototype to the untrained mind.
What's up with the font? You certainly can tell from looking at the picture that it will be more progressive than not, an exhaustive explanation wouldn't be worth my time as you're so dead set on disagreeing though.Damn True said:Which dosen't sound like a rearward axle path and dosen't seem to reflect what Yeti is saying which profoundly illustrates my point that NONE of us is able to tell what or how this thing will perform by looking at a drawing.
That or he's looking for any patent violations so he can sue.Echo said:I'm surprised we haven't heard from dw on this... usually he is happy to contribute to engineering discussions, even when they are not about his designs. Maybe this work of art left him speechless?
You're a jerk! I need another jobInstigator said:Echo, I called Victor and told him we both want one
your welcome
Echo said:I'm surprised we haven't heard from dw on this... usually he is happy to contribute to engineering discussions, even when they are not about his designs. Maybe this work of art left him speechless?
Hey, that's the way marketing works. You always need something new and different.math2014 said:so ok interesting design, what i dont get is what it wrong with pivors and now we got rails?
kidwoo said:Hey that sounds like a haughty spirit. Are you getting ready for a fall?
Maybe someone with a quick cad plot can show the axle path.
Word, BV,binary visions said:Hey, that's the way marketing works. You always need something new and different.
Now, nobody flame me - obviously, none of us really know how well this will work, and maybe it'll be fantastic. But there's no denying that a lot of these will sell based on the fact that, hey, man, it's got rails!
That's all I'm sayin.math2014 said:Word, BV,
this may prove to be a terrific bike, so far it is hype....
Kind of reminds of of specialized............. I like the bikes but can sit there climbing, watching my shock move around on smooth uphills...regardless of where the arrows point on the schematic drawings..ohio said:This bike may ride like a jet-powered barca-lounger for all I know... but readiung things like "negates pedalling and braking forces because they're perpendicular to main rail" makes me want to kick puppies.
Looks to me like someone took some notes looking at the marin funky 4 bars that came out a while ago and just found a neater way to do it.ohio said:(here's a little engineering esoterica for you: it also happens to be a 4-bar...)
ohio said:This bike may ride like a jet-powered barca-lounger for all I know... but readiung things like "negates pedalling and braking forces because they're perpendicular to main rail" makes me want to kick puppies.
That load of bunk means either the engineer didn't know what he was doing, the marketer didn't know what the engineer was doing, or nobody knew what they were doing, and you're looking at another piece of trial-and-error, make-it-look-cool-and-then-let-pro-riders-adjust-the-geometry bicycle design.
This bike has pivots just like any other bike. This bike has an axle path just like any other bike. This bike has instant centers just like any other bike. Pedalling and braking will influence it. I don't know if it will be in a good way or a bad way, but in SOME way.
(here's a little engineering esoterica for you: it also happens to be a 4-bar...)
What did I do to get on your "ignore" list? :eviltonguInclag said:Thank you for saying that this bike has pivots. I ended up not posting something that I typed earlier regarding doing bad things to kittens if anyone else said something about this bike having no pivots.
Hahakidwoo said:What did I do to get on your "ignore" list? :eviltongu
The travel where you will be pedaling it lenghtens the chain. I.Ei chain pull, pedal kickback. that is ok in moderation. but you will feel the suspention move through the chain. like a orange, mabey less.ohio said:This bike may ride like a jet-powered barca-lounger for all I know... but readiung things like "negates pedalling and braking forces because they're perpendicular to main rail" makes me want to kick puppies.
That load of bunk means either the engineer didn't know what he was doing, the marketer didn't know what the engineer was doing, or nobody knew what they were doing, and you're looking at another piece of trial-and-error, make-it-look-cool-and-then-let-pro-riders-adjust-the-geometry bicycle design.
This bike has pivots just like any other bike. This bike has an axle path just like any other bike. This bike has instant centers just like any other bike. Pedalling and braking will influence it. I don't know if it will be in a good way or a bad way, but in SOME way.
(here's a little engineering esoterica for you: it also happens to be a 4-bar...)
Given, my kinematics studies involved only chemicals, but even I could see little round things on the drawings that looked like they rotate.Inclag said:Haha
It's just that when you have the infamous Professor Robert L. Norton teaching you Kinematics through the books that he wrote and computer programs he designed, you begin to look at trivial and stupid things like bike suspension in a different way
don't drink, but............ i am super tierdDamn True said:I think I understand what you are saying, but I can't help wondering if it is beer 30 there.
Figured something was up.bcd said:don't drink, but............ i am super tierd
Exactly, and of course the first thing I'm gonna do at Interbike is take a look and figure out how to put a floater on it!!! That'll sure piss someone off!! (and the new IH, too)ohio said:This bike may ride like a jet-powered barca-lounger for all I know... but readiung things like "negates pedalling and braking forces because they're perpendicular to main rail" makes me want to kick puppies.
This bike has pivots just like any other bike. This bike has an axle path just like any other bike. This bike has instant centers just like any other bike. Pedalling and braking will influence it. I don't know if it will be in a good way or a bad way, but in SOME way.
Well, from what I know about the rail design (not on the bike, but that kind of rail design in general), there are wipers on them.Threepointtwo said:All of this discussion of the problems with exposed sliding surfaces is interesting and could be a problem. Your fork faces a similar situation and avoids damage with a simple wiper. I wonder if they have something similar in mind?
Then think about what the shaft of your rear shock looks like. The shock is completely covered with mud, but the shaft is nice and shiny.binary visions said:Well, from what I know about the rail design (not on the bike, but that kind of rail design in general), there are wipers on them.
However, the linkages will be much more prone getting mud and schit thrown up onto them from the tires. Think about what your rear linkage looks like after a muddy DH run compared to your fork.
Yep, because there's some pretty good seals there. But the mud is going to be far less prone to collecting on the shaft surface because A) it's small, B) it's round, C) it's somewhat protected by the coil and D) the entirety of the shaft is never exposed once you sit on the bike - the shaft is constantly, at least partly in the shock body.Echo said:Then think about what the shaft of your rear shock looks like. The shock is completely covered with mud, but the shaft is nice and shiny.
Yeah right, if your wheels never leave the ground. Funny, but mine tend to do that when I'm ridingbinary visions said:D) the entirety of the shaft is never exposed once you sit on the bike - the shaft is constantly, at least partly in the shock body.
None of this applies to the rails.
Touche!Dogboy said:Yeah right, if your wheels never leave the ground. Funny, but mine tend to do that when I'm riding