two months in jail just made his career as a lifelong martyrInfoWars host gets 60 days in prison over Jan. 6 charges
InfoWars host Owen Shroyer was sentenced Tuesday to 60 days in prison for his actions that the government claimed “helped create January 6,” The Associated Press reported. Shroyer did not enter the…thehill.com
“The Democrats are posing as communists, but we know what they really are: They’re just tyrants"two months in jail just made his career as a lifelong martyr
“The Democrats are posing as communists, but we know what they really are: They’re just tyrants"
It's always projection...
Great... now I want to freebase some... urine?
I've got it on *very* good authority that only guilty people plead the 5th.
Sounds like some major-league FAFO right there...
The screenshot that @jonKranked posted kinda makes it sound like there were mail in ballots that were actually filled out and blocked. According to the links below, he sued the Supreme Court of Texas and prevented the application for the ballots even being sent. All legal-like and shit.Why is this not all over the real news, if it has legs?
Or was it all ‘legal’, and he is bragging about it?
so he stopped them from being sent out, not stopped them from being counted, correct?The screenshot that @jonKranked posted kinda makes it sound like there were mail in ballots that were actually filled out and blocked. According to the links below, he sued the Supreme Court of Texas and prevented the application for the ballots even being sent. All legal-like and shit.
ETA: Also that’s old AF news. Like, summer of ‘21 kind of old.
No, Texas’ attorney general didn’t toss mail ballots
Following the historic impeachment of Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton over allegations of bribery and abuse of office,www.politifact.com
Paxton: Trump Would've Lost Texas If It Hadn't Blocked Mail-in Ballot Forms
"We would've been one of those battleground states," Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton said.www.newsweek.com
He introduced litigation that prompted the TX Supreme Court to block applications (requests) for mail-in ballots from being sent out to ~2.5 million people.so he stopped them from being sent out, not stopped them from being counted, correct?
View attachment 202959
oh certainly agree that the devil is in the details on procedural stuff like this. effectively the same end result though.He introduced litigation that prompted the TX Supreme Court to block applications (requests) for mail-in ballots from being sent out to ~2.5 million people.
I agree that the screen capture you posted is technically correct… from a certain point of view. But the choice of words could be interpreted that he blocked completed mail-in ballots from being counted, which could have a much more heightened emotional response in my opinion. “Spin” like that only serves one purpose, and that’s to entrench an “us vs. them” mindset on the viewer.
That’s why I think that details and nuance matter in situations like this. That is, where we are in effect demonizing “the other side” for not playing fair. I think it’s important to be quite exact in the specifics, those actual pesky facts, and be as objective as we can.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m not defending Paxton here. 100% believe that mail in voting is fully legit and should be more widely utilized than it is. And I‘m of the opinion the actions that Paxton took are quite undemocratic, even though they were “legal“. It’s absolutely another example of a conservative player effectively taking the right/ability to vote away from the people.
Not likely the same end result.oh certainly agree that the devil is in the details on procedural stuff like this. effectively the same end result though.
Gonna need more looney bins.Prosecutors grapple with alternate reality defense in Paul Pelosi trial
The trial has become something of a test of what happens when certain far-out strains of digital-age American radicalism collide with the criminal justice system.www.politico.com
They are blurring faces to protect the "innocent".
Sure.........They are blurring faces to protect the "innocent".
Speaker Mike Johnson says he's blurring Jan. 6 footage so rioters don't get charged
"We don’t want them to be retaliated against and to be charged by the DOJ,” the House speaker said. His office later noted that DOJ already has the raw footage.www.nbcnews.com
Well, now, we can't have people harassing traitors now, can we? Traitors need to be protected!Party of "law and order" openly concealing evidence of disorder and criminal activity!
I believe there is some evidence that Boobert was giving "tours" of the capital the day before to some seditionists as well. Be a shame if there was audio of people talking about that.He's trying to protect mtg
Marjorie The Gollum