For example you have the candidates and want none of them in office. What is worse, voting for the "lesser of two evils" or abstaining from the vote completely?
People like to get on a high horse about non-voters, but more and more it seems the choice of candidates we have is pretty slim. Personally when I am given a choice where neither side agrees with me, I choose not to choose.
They need to give every ballot a "they both suck" check box, then they can scrap both candidates and gives us new choices.
People like to get on a high horse about non-voters, but more and more it seems the choice of candidates we have is pretty slim. Personally when I am given a choice where neither side agrees with me, I choose not to choose.
They need to give every ballot a "they both suck" check box, then they can scrap both candidates and gives us new choices.