Saw it last night. There were several moments like that in the movie, very well timed shots of action that went on and on with no cuts. Added to the tension of the scenes.The steady-cam work in the refugee camp was amazing, 2 minute running gun battle and no cuts....damn!
Not really a feel good movie when I think about it. There is alot of plausible future in that flick and it's fairly depressing.I hate feel good movies.
Well this is your movie. A bleak dystopia, showing some of the worst parts of human nature.I hate feel good movies.
An old man dies... a young girl lives.What was the point of killing him and the baby in the end? Was it to demonstrate the futility of life?
aye. my first reaction was: "wtf?"yeah, i should just say the end killed it for me.
They were immigrants in England. England was herding them into camps as a survival measure for the state. (keep England for the English)but as a movie, i feel it lacked alot of information
there were many ideas that were not explained what-so-ever
the idea of infertility-where did it come from?, the problem w. all the refugees/immigrants- why were they there, what were they refugees from?
What happens to a society when it finds out there will be no future generation to carry on? Anarchy, you are fuct, so's your neighbor, you might as well steal his big screen to watch the apocolypse in style. Take that to a nationwide scale. Its not that hard to picture.yes i got the fact that they were there and all, but how/why did homelands fall apart? i did not understand how every OTHER country had fallen apart but maybe i just missed that too?..