another go is a big no-no: a second complaint about exactly the same situation isn't something a judge considers lightly..If you can't sell the land, let that brush fill in and I'd give it another go but make sure not to cut anything down.
the clearcutting wasn't really the problem.. it was the sudden change of 3 jumps to x piles of dirt which completely altered the global look of the terrain..I could be wrong but looking at the pics, I think clearcutting the land in the first place, then having machinery might have thrown the flags.
+100 dude. I get crap all the time for trying to save trees and green stuff. I transplant some to move 'em if I have to. I want shade in the summer and cover in the winter. And I can't stand pits dug right next to trails. I want it all to blend in and look natural. I take it as a compliment when newbs ask "Where did you get all the dirt from"....People bust my stones but I'll work around a small tree or bushes at our trails just to keep things green. Make one path a few feet wide going thru the place and build jumps.
Leave the trees alone!
MMM treez
hahahaha and mmm trees is right
my condolences on the loss of your trails sucks that you went about it the legit way and still got f*cked
there are always lazy assholes that can't stand walking around a tree apparently: next to my trails there's a path (actually it's part of my land) and it has two fallen yet alive trees on it, say 1.5 feet high, easy to walk over. I left them there, nice to practice bunnyhopping.I had never been more pissed than when I showed up to the trails one day and somebody had cut down a tree... WTF!!
+200 ! If people dig right next to jumps, eventually you will have a moon landscape.. . . And I can't stand pits dug right next to trails. I want it all to blend in and look natural. I take it as a compliment when newbs ask "Where did you get all the dirt from".
. . . .
It seems like there would be some minimal amount of relief change a person is allowed to do without getting a license. The heavy equipment digger probably had something to do with the perception of major "changes in relief" ?another go is a big no-no: a second complaint about exactly the same situation isn't something a judge considers lightly..
the clearcutting wasn't really the problem.. it was the sudden change of 3 jumps to x piles of dirt which completely altered the global look of the terrain..
. . .
Anyway, the people at the city hall cleared some things out: building trails is considered a change of the relief, and is *always* illegal without a license. Whether the license can be acquired depends heavily on the type of land: agricultural and woods are probably impossible to get one for, 'normal' land (ie meant for houses) should be possible, but it also depends on lots of factors. . . .