Not untypical at all for 'race only' product.^^^ now that would be just stupid. offer a frame to the public and have no warrenty on it. thats just bad e-speculation
okay makes since in a way, but it still doesnt really explain why they wouldnt put a warrenty on the frame unless they were just offering it to there riders, and if that were the case then it wouldnt have been at interbike, or in this catalogue. so hopefully what jbogner said is what is going to be in affect, but we will just have to wait and see.originally posted by davep
Not untypical at all for 'race only' product.
I have looked the site over (and noe the catalog) to find some mention of this, but they say nothing, in turn, maybe that says something..If they are truely making a frame of that weight, and they will stand behind it (not just what the warranty 'says', but what they 'do' (see Turner)) That is truely awesome.
agreed on the socom. No warranty though from what i've heard...
Just as back aswards as the first year when they were 73mm bb and came as a 150 rear as an option. Or even better, with a standard 73mm bb spacing, any crank bigger than 165mm would hit the seat stay.Interesting. Both the M3 and the Socom are available with a 135mm rear spacing, despite having 83mm BBs. Surely this gives terrible chainline? Anybody running this setup?
And yeah, let's hope they can build 'em straight eh?
Well, thats what happens when some dude makes it in his garageJust as back aswards as the first year when they were 73mm bb and came as a 150 rear as an option. Or even better, with a standard 73mm bb spacing, any crank bigger than 165mm would hit the seat stay.
Just as back aswards as the first year when they were 73mm bb and came as a 150 rear as an option. Or even better, with a standard 73mm bb spacing, any crank bigger than 165mm would hit the seat stay.
Yah, "Carnes", would you like to buy a vowel, bitch?Intense Catalogue said:Palmer takes silver at Worlds in Carnes, Australia