Quantcast

McCain ~vs~ Obama: Election 2008

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
You can immediately verify that a right wing nutjob is incapable of intelligent conversation when he resorts to things like making fun of a candidate's choice of biking clothes.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
You can immediately verify that a right wing nutjob is incapable of intelligent conversation when he resorts to things like making fun of a candidate's choice of biking clothes.
bush was a much cooler biker than obama

u can cry now.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,255
13,377
Portland, OR
bush was a much cooler biker than obama

u can cry now.
No doubt. The BEST thing you can ever do for a guy who lost his legs in a pointless war is make him run with you, too.

Next, Bush is having a mandatory working party of disabled vets to clear some brush on his ranch. What a pal!
 

$tinkle

Expert on blowing
Feb 12, 2003
14,591
6
bush was a much cooler biker than obama

u can cry now.
KERRY was a much cooler biker than obama. i mean, c'mon - a comfort bike? at least bush was rockin' a trek (fuel?)
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
:spam:

Complaint filed with FEC against McCain campaign
Associated Press - June 9, 2008 6:23 PM ET

WASHINGTON (AP) - A group with Democratic ties is urging the Federal Election Commission to examine two financial transactions involving several officials of John McCain's campaign.

Campaign Money Watch is raising questions about payments from a former finance chairman of McCain's to the campaign finance director. It's also wary about the reduction of a debt to a company that is co-owned by McCain's campaign manager. The group suspects "serious conflict of interest questions."

The McCain campaign says the complaint is "baseless," and that everything was carefully reviewed by lawyers. A spokesman says the payments were for legitimate work, and is confident the FEC will toss the complaint.

Campaign Money Watch is also running an ad in the Washington, D.C., area questioning McCain's role concerning an Air Force contract for a refueling tanker.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Cool...

Obama then:

The Obama Campaign Criticized Sen. Clinton For Accepting Contributions From Representatives Of Countrywide. "Obama aides also said Clinton is in no position to stiffen oversight after taking contributions from mortgage industry lobbyists, including funds from representatives of Countrywide, which has been at the center of the mortgage meltdown. 'If we're really going to crack down on the practices that caused the credit and housing crises, we're going to need a leader who doesn't owe these industries any favors,' campaign manager David Plouffe said."
and obama now:

James Johnson, one of three people tapped by Mr. Obama recently to oversee the search for his running mate, took at least five real estate loans totaling more than $7 million from Countrywide Financial Corp. through an informal program for friends of the company's CEO, Angelo Mozilo, the Wall Street Journal reported Saturday. The Journal said at least two of the mortgages, among a series of loans made available to people Countrywide officials called "friends of Angelo," were at rates below market averages, though it is difficult to predict a market rate without access to nonpublic information about a borrower's credit history and other factors that can reduce interest charges on a loan.
Among the loans to Mr. Johnson, according to the Journal, were a $5 million home equity line of credit against a house in Ketchum, Idaho, a 5.25% loan of $1.3 million for a home in Palm Desert, Calif., and a 3.875% loan of $971,650 for a home in Washington, D.C. The interest rates applied for the first five years of the loans.

"That reeks most high," a public relations specialist and vocal critic of Mr. Mozilo, Bonnie Russell of Del Mar, Calif., said. "Where's the 'change to believe in' if they're playing the same old game using the same old players?"

On the campaign trail, Mr. Obama has criticized Countrywide's executives. "These are the people who are responsible for infecting the economy and helping to create a home foreclosure crisis. Two million people may end up losing their homes," Mr. Obama said in March at a town hall meeting in Lancaster, Pa.

The Chicago Tribune reported that the senator from Illinois "fumed" over a total of $19 million in bonuses set to be paid to Mr. Mozilo and the president of Countrywide, David Sambol. "They get a $19 million bonus while people are at risk of losing their home. What's wrong with this picture?" Mr. Obama asked.

In a written statement issued in March, the senator called the payments "an outrage" and suggested Mr. Mozilo and others had "tricked" homeowners into unaffordable loans. "These executives crossed the line to boost their bottom line," Mr. Obama declared.

A spokesman for the Republican National Committee, Danny Diaz, yesterday called the loans to Mr. Johnson "highly questionable" and said they conflicted with Mr. Obama's public comments. "Barack Obama needs to immediately address this matter; otherwise, his rhetoric will continue to prove to be nothing more than complete hypocrisy," Mr. Diaz said.

Aides to Mr. Obama had no immediate response yesterday afternoon to a request for comment for this article. An attorney for Mr. Johnson, Brian Brooks, did not respond to e-mail and telephone messages seeking comment yesterday. However, in a statement to the Journal, Mr. Brooks defended the loans as "well within the band of standard industry practices with regard to price and structure of loans to borrowers of Mr. Johnson's background."
 

Secret Squirrel

There is no Justice!
Dec 21, 2004
8,150
1
Up sh*t creek, without a paddle
Let's put this into the distiller and see what pops out:

Peeps be trippin' for teh cashola.


Whoa...there's a surprise.


However, since I'm freakin' bored, I'll bite on the troll and play a little devil's advocate:

Clinton accepted contributions from a company that was imploding and screwing the "average American". Check.

Obama's buddy got a bunch of loans. Survey says that they weren't sub-prime and the fact the little c&p tidbit itself says, "though it is difficult to predict a market rate without access to nonpublic information about a borrower's credit history and other factors that can reduce interest charges on a loan." puts up some flags for me. Check.

No absolving goin' on here, but everyone that is that high up in whatever industry is up to their neck in trying to get more moola. End of story.

I'm still surprised that all the people that knew about Tyco, Enron, Global Crossing, etc. et al. didn't rise as one and slay the embezzlers. This 19 million dollar bonus sh*t that's going on while people are losing their shirt is similarly aggrivating.

I'm just surprised there's not a publicly known website that has bounties for certain lending officials and others involved in the felching.
 

stevew

resident influencer
Sep 21, 2001
40,609
9,618
^
^

I'd go cathy bates on him and take a 10lb sledgehammer to his feet while he slept.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
24
SF, CA
Future First "Baby Mama"? :rofl:

Thank you, Fox news.
My favorite part is when Malkin as claiming that thus far the Republican attacks against Michelle Obama have been focused on the substance of her public statements, and have not resorted to personal attacks, while the caption below her reads "Malkin call Michelle Obama "Obama's Bitter Half."

You just can't make this stuff up.
 

Silver

find me a tampon
Jul 20, 2002
10,840
1
Orange County, CA
The Republicans ought to just start referring to Obama as "The uppity N*****"

It's getting a little old watching them attempt to come up with new ways to imply it without actually saying it. I mean, if you're going to be a racist, at least be proud of it. It's part of your American heritage.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,255
13,377
Portland, OR
The Republicans ought to just start referring to Obama as "The uppity N*****"

It's getting a little old watching them attempt to come up with new ways to imply it without actually saying it. I mean, if you're going to be a racist, at least be proud of it. It's part of your American heritage.
:clapping:

A co-worker and I were saying the same thing at lunch about Fox News.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
Finally, McCain says something that makes sense.. congress needs to be bitchslapped asap.


http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/06/16/AR2008061602731_pf.html

McCain says the United States has 21 billion barrels of proven oil reserves which are not being tapped because of a federal moratorium on exploration and production.

"I believe it is time for the federal government to lift these restrictions and to put our own reserves to use," he will say. "We can do this in ways that are consistent with sensible standards of environmental protection."
 
Last edited:

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,481
20,284
Sleazattle
Although it is good to hear him say this:

"In the face of climate change and other serious challenges, energy conservation is no longer just a moral luxury or a personal virtue," he will say. "Conservation serves a critical national goal."
Saying "drill for more oil" as his plan for action is inconsistent and disappointing. Tapping domestic sources of oil is more of a solution to the trade deficit. This is a worldwide energy market and drilling "American oil" will make little to no difference in price, domestic oil just keeps the money in our economy. Cutting our energy use is the only real way to cut our energy cost.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Although it is good to hear him say this:



Saying "drill for more oil" as his plan for action is inconsistent and disappointing. Tapping domestic sources of oil is more of a solution to the trade deficit. This is a worldwide energy market and drilling "American oil" will make little to no difference in price, domestic oil just keeps the money in our economy. Cutting our energy use is the only real way to cut our energy cost.
Well, also:

McCain backs federal subsidies for building more nuclear power plants, which he considers the best way to reduce U.S. carbon dioxide emissions.
That is heartening to hear, but probably just lip service at this point. And by the way, he is also an idiot for going on and on about how we need to cut the federal gas tax for a while.
I mean, it's 18 cents. That'd save me less than $4 per fill up in a 20 gal tank. Or in other words... nothing substantial.

But what's ironic is that, as republicans have become known for lately, he's talking about cutting taxes and at the same time backing more federal subsidies. Yet more debt, I guess.
 

Westy

the teste
Nov 22, 2002
54,481
20,284
Sleazattle
Well, also:



That is heartening to hear, but probably just lip service at this point. And by the way, he is also an idiot for going on and on about how we need to cut the federal gas tax for a while.
I mean, it's 18 cents. That'd save me less than $4 per fill up in a 20 gal tank. Or in other words... nothing substantial.

But what's ironic is that, as republicans have become known for lately, he's talking about cutting taxes and at the same time backing more federal subsidies. Yet more debt, I guess.

Nuclear would be good and I would like to see it pushed by an administration. It will still be difficult because of the Not In My Backyard crowd and environmental groups that can't see the forest for the trees. The whole cut taxes and spend thing is the main reason why I can not support McCain, bread and circus is all it is.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
Nuclear would be good and I would like to see it pushed by an administration. It will still be difficult because of the Not In My Backyard crowd and environmental groups that can't see the forest for the trees. The whole cut taxes and spend thing is the main reason why I can not support McCain, bread and circus is all it is.
Imagine all the jobs (engineers, construction, architects, security, janitors, etc. etc.) if a bunch of nuclear plants popped up. I think some places would be happy to have them. NIMBYism is a pain in the ass, but that whole imminent domain thing has been exercised before. And plus we have Texas as a perfect dumping ground for any waste.
Come to think of it, we could probably solve the illegal immigration problem at the same time by use of some tactically sound dumping sites.
It'd be so nice not to depend on foreign oil anymore...Iraq would suddenly be a non issue I bet. Probably afghanistan too. If opening up offshore drilling were a way out of the middle east, and a transition into a clearly spelled out, bipartisan backed nuclear switch...I'd be fine with it for a short time.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,255
13,377
Portland, OR
Imagine all the jobs (engineers, construction, architects, security, janitors, etc. etc.) if a bunch of nuclear plants popped up.
That goes for any domestic power source, though. If we had large solar/wind/water sites, you would create nearly the same number of jobs only with less waste.

I like the idea of SOME nuclear plants, but money should be spent on all alternatives. Coal and oil get us into trouble, so multiple options leave us open to multiple solutions.

The whole "Not in our backyard" issue goes with prisons, too. I know when Oregon wanted to build one, everyone was up in arms about it except for east Oregon towns that need revenue. I would thing the same approach can be used if the idea of jobs are pitched with it.
 

BurlyShirley

Rex Grossman Will Rise Again
Jul 4, 2002
19,180
17
TN
That goes for any domestic power source, though. If we had large solar/wind/water sites, you would create nearly the same number of jobs only with less waste.

I like the idea of SOME nuclear plants, but money should be spent on all alternatives. Coal and oil get us into trouble, so multiple options leave us open to multiple solutions.

The whole "Not in our backyard" issue goes with prisons, too. I know when Oregon wanted to build one, everyone was up in arms about it except for east Oregon towns that need revenue. I would thing the same approach can be used if the idea of jobs are pitched with it.
Yeah, it just seems so obvious that we should be producing, employing, using and paying for all this stuff within our borders. F***cking coal mining makes me sick, even though it is done domestically, becuase of what's happening to the mountains.
Ironically though, did you know that wildlife is actually flourishing around chernobyl these days? So even in a "disaster" however unlikely that may be, it doesn't turn out as bad as what's going on in the coal mining areas.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,255
13,377
Portland, OR
Yeah, it just seems so obvious that we should be producing, employing, using and paying for all this stuff within our borders. F***cking coal mining makes me sick, even though it is done domestically, becuase of what's happening to the mountains.
Ironically though, did you know that wildlife is actually flourishing around chernobyl these days? So even in a "disaster" however unlikely that may be, it doesn't turn out as bad as what's going on in the coal mining areas.
After watching a documentary (posted a few weeks ago) on coal, I was pissed beyond words. It sure as hell motivated me to see what happens during mountain top removal.

The special they had on Discovery called "Life after people" showed how pants and animals have taken over a small town that was wiped out by Chernobyl. I just think that AFTER we get the level of consumption down that nuke/hydro/air/solar options will be an easy sell and get off the Saudi tit.
 

ohio

The Fresno Kid
Nov 26, 2001
6,649
24
SF, CA
We've waited so long to hop on nuclear that we'll need ANWAR to bridge the 5-10 year gap for plants to come online if we want to avoid (more) serious economic collapse.

It sucks, but we did it to ourselves. I am vehemently opposed to drilling ANWAR, but it WILL happen because we won't be able to take the pain...

And yes, we need to diversify... solar-thermal in the desert, geothermal along the continental divide and west coast, tidal and wind on both coasts, and hydro only where absolutely necessary. However, all of those options are specific to locales. Anywhere that is flat and temperate we HAVE to go with nuclear, which should mean as much as 50% of the grid in the next 25 years.
 

Echo

crooked smile
Jul 10, 2002
11,819
15
Slacking at work
I've heard theories that it's all a big scam, they have groups that say "we want to drill ANWR" and others that say "you can't drill ANWR", but it's all a distraction to the real fact that when everyone else runs out of oil, we will be sitting on a nice chunk.
 

jimmydean

The Official Meat of Ridemonkey
Sep 10, 2001
41,255
13,377
Portland, OR
We've waited so long to hop on nuclear that we'll need ANWAR to bridge the 5-10 year gap for plants to come online if we want to avoid (more) serious economic collapse.
But even the experts say if we started drilling today we wouldn't see oil out of ANWAR for at least 5 more years. That's why things like solar are more important IMO because of the turn around time to offset some of the energy.
 

N8 v2.0

Not the sharpest tool in the shed
Oct 18, 2002
11,003
149
The Cleft of Venus
But even the experts say if we started drilling today we wouldn't see oil out of ANWAR for at least 5 more years. That's why things like solar are more important IMO because of the turn around time to offset some of the energy.

solar is an expensive pipe dream at this point... the bucks to benifit ratio sux0r0z

Nuke generation is exactly where we are headed... just like France.