not sure it will help, but the properties lists the vid codec as 'Windows Media Video 9', and the audio codec as 'Windows Media Audio 9I asked: Do I need to download some special codec or something?
You answered: You may not have the correct codec.
Not really an answer is it!
Have they indicated if the points awarded for qualifying are null and void now? What good is qualifying except for "those less than immortal"?The idea of the points was just that, it allowed you to choose. Go for broke and get 50 points, or go cautiously and hope it paid off in finals.
BTW rule change has now been confirmed through the UCI.
Explanation as to why and how it will work is here:
http://www.transcendmagazine.com/archives/2007/06/world_cup_downh.html
Thanks for the heads up.
Here you go:Do I need to download some special codec or something?
uhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
I was wondering the same thing. He may have been out of the top 20 overall due to it being early in the season and he didn't seem to do too many other events. Although, i am not sure if they base the top 20 on the World Cup overall, or UCI points?©2001;2570141 said:was kovarik not top 20 overall, so he didn't make finals based on quali? how was he not top 20 with a win last year?
He attacked out of the gate like someone from the heavens gave him a personal guarantee he would not crash in the slop....unreal.
and 25 seconds slower on the second half of the courseHelloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo?
Damien Mermoud - 4.2 seconds quicker at the split than Hill in qualifying, when Hill stamped 15seconds into everyone else? No-one interested?!
stik got post 666. coincidence?^ Ya, and when GM got up, he looked like his dislocated shoulder was feeling great too.
Qualifying DH: didn't make the big showanyone know what happend to philip polc?
Skiing does a reverse top thirty, meaning they take the results from the first run and reverse them, so the first place person goes thirtieth and the thirtieth person goes first. so in mountain biking, take the first fifteen or thirty finishers from qualifying and reverse them.I'm all for leaving the qualifying format as is. How does World Cup Skiing do their top 20? Auto qualify or is it fall down/go home?
Also, I thought UCI gave points for qualifying to make qualifying such a massively important factor for the pros to go hard in practice. Am I right on that? You gain more points in qualifying, meaning the difference in the overall at seasons end?
It's nobody's fault but Hill and Nico's that they qualified the way they did. Them and it looked like Gee were the only real top dogs who chose to qualify high and go for a few points. Their strategic mistake.
I remember Minnarr cost himself a higher finish at Worlds a few years back...gambled that it would rain during finals. Instead, the top guys had a dry, grooved in line come finals time.
Always...love me some fun.©2001;2570388 said:stik got post 666. coincidence?
edit: forgot the to emphasize this is in good fun.
Think you got that one backwards...it goes like this "Peat was leading Barel at the split...until he slid out....he would have won too!"becasue Hill could have gone far more than 15 seconds faster, considering what he had up his sleeve later in the day i would doubt his semi-final was his best effort.
besides, only Barel fans care about who wins the split race
no offence... but i think you a bit obsessed with kovarik. after every race all your post involve him and/or pictures of him.photos up...
http://www.canadiancyclist.com/races07/champery/partnine/index.htm
http://www.canadiancyclist.com/races07/champery/partseven/index.htm
I think photographers don't like Kovarik...I didn't find a pic of him.
You call him out for wondering where a respected and "cool aussie" rider is, yet where is the flack for the 3.2 million other posters absolutaly slobbing Sam's knob?no offence... but i think you a bit obsessed with kovarik. after every race all your post involve him and/or pictures of him.
is there some secret e-stalking bromance going on here