Quantcast

Wow - a kinda loaded article in the NYTimes

Jr_Bullit

I'm sooo teenie weenie!!!
Sep 8, 2001
2,028
0
North of Oz
Okay - a few things I picked up on -

They call bin Laden, "Mr." bin Laden
They also call Bush, "Mr.." Bush - denying him the honorific of president bush...

Then you get down towards the end and you see that Bush is utilizing his "debating" of bin Laden's video to distract attention from their looting of explosives in Iraq...

:think:

By DAVID E. SANGER

Published: December 30, 2004
CRAWFORD, Tex., Dec. 29 - President Bush took the unusual step on Wednesday of responding to one of Osama bin Laden's taunting tape recordings, declaring that Mr. bin Laden's recent call for Iraqis to boycott the elections in January "make the stakes of this pretty clear to me."

"His vision of the world is where people don't participate in democracy," Mr. Bush said of Mr. bin Laden, Al Qaeda's leader, who has eluded capture for more than three years. "His vision of the world is one in which there is no freedom of expression, freedom of religion and/or freedom of conscience. And that vision stands in stark contrast to the vision of, by far, the vast majority of Iraqis."

Mr. Bush's comments were unusual because, after having declared soon after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks that he wanted Mr. bin Laden "dead or alive," the president has usually avoided mentioning him.

His aides have said it would be a strategic error to respond to every one of Mr. bin Laden's tape-recorded threats, or to seem to elevate his status by putting him in a long-distance debate with the president.

But Mr. bin Laden clearly hit a nerve with his latest message, an audiotape heard over Al Jazeera, the satellite channel, on Monday that appeared to be an effort to further undermine the chances that the outcome of the Jan. 30 election would be considered legitimate.

Mr. Bush and his aides have said they think Iraqis have a deep desire to vote - and that the mere act of voting, regardless of the outcome, will make them feel both empowered and invested in the new government.

"So the stakes are clear in this upcoming election," Mr. Bush said in a helicopter hangar on his ranch here, where he held a short news conference to express his sympathies to the victims of the Indian Ocean tsunami. "It's the difference between the ability for individuals to express themselves and the willingness of an individual to try and impose his dark vision on the world, on the people of Iraq and elsewhere. And it's very important that these elections proceed."

The comments were among the most extensive Mr. Bush has made about Mr. bin Laden in some time. He has periodically referred to him, as he did just days before the presidential election last month, when a bin Laden videotape was released.

But Mr. Bush used that tape to make the case that the world was still a dangerous place and that his strategy for pursuing Al Qaeda's leader should remain unchanged.

It also served another purpose for Mr. Bush, distracting attention from a week that had seen discussions of the administration's responsibility for allowing the looting of a large store of the explosive HMX from Iraqi warehouses.

But on Wednesday, Mr. Bush was responding to a question about a Sunni party backing out of the elections. He began by insisting that "the task at hand is to provide as much security as possible for the election officials, as well as for the people inside cities like Mosul, to encourage them to express their will."
 

BillT

Monkey
Its pretty common for newspapers to first refer to the person by their full name and then to refer to them as Mr. XXX or Mrs/Ms XXX the rest of the article in order to save space. I remember reading a story about the Red Hot Chili Peppers many, many years ago in the Wall Street Journal where Flea was constantly refered to as Mr. Flea :)
 

punkassean

Turbo Monkey
Feb 3, 2002
4,561
0
SC, CA
The NY times has done the MR.____ thing for years and it still reads funny to me. I have noticed a lot of local news stations trying it out to lately.

Fawk Bush, fawk Bin Laden...
 

jaydee

Monkey
Jul 5, 2001
794
0
Victoria BC
I don't think the NY Times is allowed to say "Goatf**ker", unfortunately. I'll leave it to you folks to figure out which of the two leaders to apply it to.
 

sanjuro

Tube Smuggler
Sep 13, 2004
17,373
0
SF
Jr_Bullit said:
Mostly I was making fun of the fact that Mr. President was not given that accord in the news article.
I bet if somebody was diligent (sorry, I just came back from a rain soaked 40 miler), you would find that Mr. Bush is the way you are supposed to write it, and Mr. President is what you say in his presence.

The NY Times may be biased, but they know how to dot their i's and cross their t's.