Quantcast

New Scott DH bike

norbar

KESSLER PROBLEM. Just cause
Jun 7, 2007
11,369
1,605
Warsaw :/
A lot of people must have failed their internet engineering classes... Just because it looks strange doesn't mean it's more complex.

It has the same number of links as any other linkage-actuated single pivot. Heck it has the same number of links as most of the DH frames out there, even all the non-single pivots. The only thing simpler than this would have to be 224's and Izimu's.
It's still a bad marketing idea and marketing sells way more bikes than engineering. Especially since most people wont notice the differance.
 

Jm_

sled dog's bollocks
Jan 14, 2002
18,999
9,660
AK
A lot of people must have failed their internet engineering classes... Just because it looks strange doesn't mean it's more complex.

It has the same number of links as any other linkage-actuated single pivot. Heck it has the same number of links as most of the DH frames out there, even all the non-single pivots. The only thing simpler than this would have to be 224's and Izimu's.
Yeah, it is more complex, not because it has "moar parts", but because it's more difficult and costly to design that configuration. I'd bet on the fact that as far as CNC, forging, 3-d shaping, etc, it is more costly to design and manufacture. I estimate 1.5 seasons tops before we see the next "new" Scott bike. For a company that makes such great ski poles, they sure make some crazy bikes. Previous generations that snapped chainstays, ultra-light long-travel with so-so suspension, etc. It's just one of those companies that I never take seriously, that I'd never buy a bike from. They change about every season and it's always some wierd whack configuration that no other manufacturer would touch.
 

slyfink

Turbo Monkey
Sep 16, 2008
9,337
5,095
Ottawa, Canada
Though with all the competition out of there with frames, you can't afford to make an ugly one no matter how well it rides.
This, more than anything.
I've got to agree with Wa-aw and Godboy; no matter how well a bike rides, how "sexy" it is has to play a large part in the purchasing decision of the average consumer (ie not a sponsored or bro-deal rider). With the purported cost of setting up the molds and tooling for a production bike - especially a carbon one, is it really worth it for a company to bring such an ugly bike to market? Especially when there's equally performing and purdier bikes to choose from. I guess only time will tell.

edited to add, after seeing those additional pics: are they going to call it the "scissor-link" (tm)
 

4130biker

PM me about Tantrum Cycles!
May 24, 2007
3,884
450
Looks like they put all of the desired traits into a computer and this is what it spit out.

The linkage looks pretty robust compared to some- and seeing the pictures of Faircloth riding it doesn't hurt!
 

iRider

Turbo Monkey
Apr 5, 2008
5,653
3,093
I've got to agree with Wa-aw and Godboy; no matter how well a bike rides, how "sexy" it is has to play a large part in the purchasing decision of the average consumer (ie not a sponsored or bro-deal rider).
So there are people who pay retail for DH bikes? :eek:
 

shirk007

Monkey
Apr 14, 2009
500
357

"WTF is this whack thing doing. The cheques had better keep clearing."


"I've starred at this thing for 3hrs and had 6 engineers try to explain it, it still doesn't make any sense."
 

scottishmark

Turbo Monkey
May 20, 2002
2,121
22
Somewhere dark, cold & wet....
Interesting that no one has picked up that it appears to be a really compact frame, and they've got mass centralisation nailed. Just look at the length of that seatpost! The frame's obviously tiny, as you can see from the on-track photo. Also, all adjustments look to be accessible which is always nice

Cost-wise (man eng head on here). Simple front end, fairly simple swingarm, 3/4 forged bars (can't tell if the shock mounts onto a 1 or 2-piece design) and what I'd guess to be standard bearings, don't see any reason why it should cost more than any other DH frame - so that'll be $10,000 thanks ;)
 

dhr-racer

Monkey
Jan 24, 2007
410
0
A, A
not going to lie, its starting to grow on me. And if this is a proto they may have just done up a basic tubeset for simplicity in development no? They may change it for the carbonz cheese?
 

William42

fork ways
Jul 31, 2007
3,926
671
I think it deserves about 1/10th of the "ugly" hate that people are heaping on it. christ what a bunch of nit pickers. Its not the end of the world
 

time-bomb

Monkey
May 2, 2008
957
21
right here -> .
Moar complex = moar fasterer.

Reminds a bit of Evil only I like the Scott frame better. I like the higher pivot location too.
 
Last edited:

General Lee

Turbo Monkey
Oct 16, 2003
2,860
0
The 802
strictly from a visual standpoint I'd ride this bike before a V10 or an Intense. It still cuts classic lines of what a bicycle looks like. No curvey tubes or monocoque is just fine by me.

I bet it grows on a lot of people if Brendan starts getting some results. There's your marketing.
 

Wa-Aw

Monkey
Jul 30, 2010
354
0
Philippines
Looks are starting grown on me too. Looks much better on the trail. Comes off like a slopestyle/DS bike. I can imagine this would be very good frame for smaller riders. There looks to be some clearance issues with the bottom out knob on the RC4 so that tubeset is probably prototype. I bet a cheese version is being grown up!

FFS, it isn't complex.
 

Sandwich

Pig my fish!
Staff member
May 23, 2002
21,080
5,999
borcester rhymes
i know people are complaining about uggo, but I think it's deceptively beautiful. Nice triangle front frame, nice solid rear swingarm, yeah the linkages are a bit excessive but the lines of that bike are really really clean, much more visually appealing than most others on the market, especially the overhydroformed demos.