Sure there is...or has been...it just weighs 10.4lbs and has 65mm offset.There is not a single fork that provides what you are asking, period. It is just not going to happen at the prices and weights that some consumers are demanding.
Sure there is...or has been...it just weighs 10.4lbs and has 65mm offset.There is not a single fork that provides what you are asking, period. It is just not going to happen at the prices and weights that some consumers are demanding.
The 40 can take pretty much as much oil as your willing to put in it, as the staunctions aren't sealed up like a Boxxer. There is no problem running 100ml in each leg with the 40, but since you don't have an oil seal to keep the whole lot in, you'll leak a bit past the dust seal, which will keep the whole thing nice and lubricated, but could get a little messy.I want a 40 with a larger oil volume in it. Thats my dream. Then it would be the perfect fork... other than the scary thin lowers.
WTF? The boxxer has a much more complex low-speed damping circut/adjuster, as well as adjustable shim stack. Then there's the drop-stop. I gotta say that RS is on top of things with the boxxer when it comes to damping. I wouldn't waste your time with an 888, I'll go for the Avalanche 888 cart when it comes out and maybe retrofit it in my 888.Ha, the 888 gives you even more adjustment than what external adjusters can provides really the range of tuning is bigger with the 888, don't get sucked in to marketing
Just another marketing victim.WTF? The boxxer has a much more complex low-speed damping circut/adjuster, as well as adjustable shim stack. Then there's the drop-stop. I gotta say that RS is on top of things with the boxxer when it comes to damping.
and any Foes fork with or without the Curnutt valving.Sure there is...or has been...it just weighs 10.4lbs and has 65mm offset.
I have a few weeks on the new 66 RC3 Ti, so far very impressive.What did they say about the weight of the 66 EVO? Its hard to imagine that the ti version is a full 1lb lighter.
WTF? The boxxer has a much more complex low-speed damping circut/adjuster, as well as adjustable shim stack. Then there's the drop-stop. I gotta say that RS is on top of things with the boxxer when it comes to damping. I wouldn't waste your time with an 888, I'll go for the Avalanche 888 cart when it comes out and maybe retrofit it in my 888.
I'm kinda pissed on the fact that we have to take everything to far (or rather the marketing bastards) and it is the same for weight. I'd be perfectly happy with a 3.1-3.3kg 36mm stanction fork with larger oil volume. The only one I know so far is unfortunately BOS which costs buckets of money. I don't really see a reason for <3kg fork or thick forks. The problem with making such forks by bigger companies is that on paper it's hard to brag about it as it's not easily "the best" in anything so the e-riders can't wank to it. Personaly I think the different trends in bikes are not really as resposible as our low resistance to marketing. We go ape**** over super future tech 110% move efficent , 130 lighter OMGBBQ stuff and there is little place for reasonable products that would do their job much better.The longevity you want half existed in 2004/2005 when forks took a quart of oil per leg (actually, even then, forks would perform SIGNIFICANTLY better with monthly service). It does not exist any longer. This is a direct result of internet weight weenies demanding overly light products. With an optimized chasis design, the only way to loose significant weight in a fork is to massively reduce the oil volumes in the fork. The less lube, the shorter the service intervals whether it be a fork, a bearing assembly, or a motor...it is all the same. If you want someone to blame, blame 'you' and 'me'. Consumers are demanding underbuilt products for weight savings...and this is the result.
rumors abound that in 2011 a boxxer standard cometh.is marzocchi still using their own direct mount standart on the 2010 888s?
is that a maxle on your 66 ?I have a few weeks on the new 66 RC3 Ti, so far very impressive.
Uncut steerer w/ axle it weighed 6.15 #. This is with a 1.5 steerer, it is a bit heavier with an 1 1/8".
Looking forward to some time on the 888 Ti Evo in the near future as well.
Marz has made a huge effort to improve their line this year, time will tell if they are successful.......
No...stock Marz axle.....does look a bit like the Maxle though.is that a maxle on your 66 ?
Is the 6.7 with or without stem?No...stock Marz axle.....does look a bit like the Maxle though.
New 888 Evo Ti: 6.7 pounds w/ axle and uncut steerer.
Even had oil in it