I just remeber all the problems with the Z150 SL a few years ago. I havent tried any of the newer Zoke stuff with air.
Could a person still ride on it if for some reason the air side wouldnt hold air? Ive never looked in a doppio air fork.
VERY carefully. like if it blew or something? it'd be bottomed out. that sure would ride weird. you may damage the internals.Could a person still ride on it if for some reason the air side wouldnt hold air? Ive never looked in a doppio air fork.
VERY carefully. like if it blew or something? it'd be bottomed out. that sure would ride weird. you may damage the internals.
but since its running on the same amount of psi the other coil forks have been taking instead of the preload knob. it should be pretty damn good
its all air dude. thats the point.But it has springs in the other leg so why would it sink in travel?
Well the 888 springs do not weigh a lot (thus the minimal difference with the ti springs). The air chambers (3) require a fair bit of material and seals. The 'ATA" also requires some mechanics that do not exist in the 'standard' 888s.Ahh, all air. I guess I need to research it more. I read AIR Spring and thought it had air in one leg and a spring in the other.
Being all air, little oil and no springs, why is it only a claimed 1/2 lb lighter than the 888WC? It seems like it would be more like a full pound or more lighter.
Ahh, all air. I guess I need to research it more. I read AIR Spring and thought it had air in one leg and a spring in the other.
Being all air, little oil and no springs, why is it only a claimed 1/2 lb lighter than the 888WC? It seems like it would be more like a full pound or more lighter.
i really do not think the ATA can be that much heavier, as you correctly point out, there should be 3 chambers (or 2 and a spring but i think its 3 air chambers) and this would not change if the ATA function was removed, there is probably some weight increase but i doubt it can be more than 50g and if the adjuster knobs can be removed that can even be brought a bit down. take a look at the dual air v/s u-air pikes for instance, RS lists the weight diff for those at 90g.Well the 888 springs do not weigh a lot (thus the minimal difference with the ti springs). The air chambers (3) require a fair bit of material and seals. The 'ATA" also requires some mechanics that do not exist in the 'standard' 888s.
I wish that they would have NOT put the ATA in that fork and just made a light weight air version of the 888.
DH racers would be more likely to want the weight reduction tha air offers, but no DH racer wants ATA. That is a great feature for FR, but IMHO freeriders would prefer that durability that coil offers.
Their should have been a single coil ATA and a non adjustable air 'race' fork. Must be a European thing..
cant see why not, its probably a bit more involved than "dropping in" a cartridge in the sense that you will need hardware and adjusters, but the structure seems to be the same so why not.Do you guys think you will be able to drop the SL cart into a wc? I quite like my boxxer wc, but the new bike comes with the 888wc and I'd like to keep the fork. But I have a mission to get this bike light as possible. In the same boat I don't want to sacrfice performance
I really cant decide yet. I do a lot of traveling and riding in BC Canada and have had to replace seals at Whistler on my 888. Im just sort of worried if I had problems with the Avy, while traveling, it would be harder to find parts. Also, I dont want to have to run the double damper since its heavier. If I knew I could get away with the single dampner, that might be a different story.I take it the Avy is out again for this year?
I don't think seals have ever been an issue with Avys, but if it was a concern to you, you could always order some spares and keep them for emergencies.I really cant decide yet. I do a lot of traveling and riding in BC Canada and have had to replace seals at Whistler on my 888. Im just sort of worried if I had problems with the Avy, while traveling, it would be harder to find parts. Also, I dont want to have to run the double damper since its heavier. If I knew I could get away with the single dampner, that might be a different story.
Im riding the wifes bike right now so Im not in a huge hurry.
True, but then the single vs double damner comes into play. I have decided that I dont want the SL. Now its between the WC and the Avy.I don't think seals have ever been an issue with Avys, but if it was a concern to you, you could always order some spares and keep them for emergencies.
The weight is a tough one to get used too, however I could never get my 888 to ever feel right. Large hits it always felt great, small stuff it always felt like sh*t.As a DHS owner who has ridden avy fork on friends bike ,i for one cannot justfy the weight and cost over a well tuned 888.
Is it 30 or 40mm? The Zoke says 40mm on one page and 30mm on the ATA page.
170 runs a year at whistler, can i have your life?I guess I can't complain. I've bottomed this fork more than any I have ever owned (and HARD). It's seen more than 170 runs at Whistler, a number of meat hucking days and a handful of shuttles. Numerous cases and a few (accidental) flat landings.
If price wasn't an issue.
Write on performance.
Thanks
depends where you blow a seal, if you blow a seal in the air chamber in the fork, it would then pressurise the rest of the fork making that an air spring (ala air assist) but with out doing any calculations i cant say how firm or soft that would be. if you blew an oil seal or dust seal the fork will still work fine, except that some oil might leak out. if you blow the shrader valve then you will have decompression.So if you blew a seal in one leg, could a person ride the fork out with only air in one leg? Im just trying to figure out if this would be a reasonable fork for back country DH/FR and shuttling. Id hate to walk out 10-15miles.