Sorry, but his is going to be a long thread. I've got some serious questions to ask and I am looking for people who are very knowledgeable and edjucated on the subject.
I just got a brand new Gary Fisher King Fisher 1. (see above) It came with a Manitou Travis Instrinsic single crown 1.5 steer tube, Fox DHX 4.0 shock, (same as 5.0 but w/o the bottom out feature) and Bontrager King Earl rims and hubs, and Big Earl tires.
A new fork is worth more than a used one. So I'm not riding the bike yet and going to be taking the parts off and sell the OEM stuff Ebay this month and buying better parts. I'm swapping the fork, the shock, wheels, and tires.
Please understand I'm not asking everyone here to reply. I am not looking for answers like, "I like this shock because I have one..," I'm really looking more or less for educated answers from people that either have ridden both, or know a lot about the product as to what is truly better and more importantly, why.
I want the best parts that are more for DH/FR, so weight is not a concern.
The OEM rims are Bontrager King Earl, the hubs are King Earl part aluminum, part carbon fiber, front 20mm axel, rear 12mm skewer, offset rim 6 bolt disk. (see here)
The King Earl wheelset consists of King Earl hubs, 14/15/14 spokes and King Earl disk rims offset, I believe 29mm width, 32 spoke. see below
You can read more info on them on Bontrager's site.
I've looked online and heard a lot of forums talk about the best wheelsets for DH and FR and everyone seems to say, Sun Ringlé.
Sun Ringlé offers a wheelset called the A.D.D. on their site. They consist of the Sun Ringlé jumping flea hub, 15 guage straight spokes and Sun Ringlé 34mm MTX rims. (32 or 36 spoke) See below.
Which would be better, the OEM Bontrager King Earl set or the Sun Ringlé?
Is the Sun Ringlé jumping flea hub better than the Bontrager aluminum carbon fiber combo?
Would it be better to sell the Bontrager Wheelset or separate rim and hub, or as a set? They go for $550 on line.
**********
I've been on a Cane Creek Cloud Nine and have bee VERY pleased with the shock, performance and ride. This will be my first spring ride bike.
The King Fisher OEM shock is a FOX DHX 4.0 same as the 5.0 only no bottom out feature. Fox want's $150 labor and $65 for the part to make it a 5.0. I'm not blowing another $215 plus ship back and forth $20 for a bottom out feature.
The Fox DHX 4.0 has a manual turn spring preload, rebound, what they call pro-pedal to stop pedal bob located on the far end of the boost chamber and about 125lb boost chamber. No bottom out or compression but I believe the Pro-Pedal is their compression. So there are 3 adjusts and manual spring preload adjust.
Then there is the Manitou 6-way Swinger and the Manitou Revox speed sensitive Intrinsic. see here
The Manitou Swinger seems to have the most tuning ability but the Revox I hear is a better shock for some reason due to it's speed sensitive Intrinsic feature and we all know the Manitou Travis Triple Intrinsic is a top notch fork.
The Manitou Swinger has a manual turn spring preload, Rebound, SPV Platform Pressure, SPV Volume, Low Speed Compression, High Speed Compression.
The Manitou Revox Intrinsic is a "speed sensitive' intrinsic shock, that has a manual turn spring preload, rebound, Intrinsic Air, No-Tools Volume, high and low speed compression.
The Swinger seems to have the most adjustment nobs for tuning. However the Intrinsic feature of the Revox, Manitou stated was better due to it's speed sensitive intrinsic dampening.
Now onto the shock of the year for 2007. I'd say hand's down I'd buy a Cane Creek because I've had two AD-5's that eventually failed and Cane Creek is a great company that stands behind their product. Cane Creek handed me a Cloud Nine that I've had for about 6 years and it's exactly what I like, using my air pressure, compression, and rebound settings. I have no pedal bob, great compression dampening and rebound. So naturally I'm all ready to unload the Fox DHX on Ebay and go off and buy a Cane Creek Double Barrel just for Cane Creeks reliability and standing by me, their customer, after so many years.
The Cane Creek Double barrel though uses twin tube technology while the rest use a single tube. The Double Barrel has a manual turn spring preload, but separates the rebound and compression into two chambers.
There are separate high and low speed adjusts for the compression tube, and rebound tube thus controling the flow of oil through the valving more than single tube design.
Like all the other piggy back shocks mentioned, it too has an air boost chamber.
I really like the more tunable shock however Cane Creek's double barrel has a MAJOR drawback that I really don't like and it will probably be the only reason why I rule it out. Unlike it's competition, it does not have the easy of use when doing these adjustments in the woods. With the Manitou and Fox, all one needs is two fingers to turn the knobs to adjust the rebound and compression tuning. With the Cane Creek, you need a screwdriver and a 10 hex nut driver. So tuning the Cane Creek and making on-trail adjustments is going to be more of a pain than the other shocks. So is the twin tube technology really worth it until Cane Creek addresses the problem by switching from nut and screw driver adjusts to finger adjusts?
Which shock is better suited for DH/FR and more tunable.., the OEM Fox DHX 4.0 that came on the King Fisher 1, the Manitou 6-way Swinger, the Manitou Revox Intrinsic, or the Cane Creek Double Barrel, and why?
As to the fork and tires, I've already made up my mind. I'm selling the King Earl tires, for 2.5 Maxxis Minions and I'm swapping the single crown 1.5 inch steer tube Manitou Travis Intrinsic 180mm for a 1.8 inch Manitou Travis Triple Intrinsic 203mm. Which means the brand new Cane Creek 1.5 head set and the King Earl stem will be on Ebay too.
So I'd really appreciate some educated technological input as to what is better and why.
Thanks
I just got a brand new Gary Fisher King Fisher 1. (see above) It came with a Manitou Travis Instrinsic single crown 1.5 steer tube, Fox DHX 4.0 shock, (same as 5.0 but w/o the bottom out feature) and Bontrager King Earl rims and hubs, and Big Earl tires.
A new fork is worth more than a used one. So I'm not riding the bike yet and going to be taking the parts off and sell the OEM stuff Ebay this month and buying better parts. I'm swapping the fork, the shock, wheels, and tires.
Please understand I'm not asking everyone here to reply. I am not looking for answers like, "I like this shock because I have one..," I'm really looking more or less for educated answers from people that either have ridden both, or know a lot about the product as to what is truly better and more importantly, why.
I want the best parts that are more for DH/FR, so weight is not a concern.
The OEM rims are Bontrager King Earl, the hubs are King Earl part aluminum, part carbon fiber, front 20mm axel, rear 12mm skewer, offset rim 6 bolt disk. (see here)
The King Earl wheelset consists of King Earl hubs, 14/15/14 spokes and King Earl disk rims offset, I believe 29mm width, 32 spoke. see below
You can read more info on them on Bontrager's site.
I've looked online and heard a lot of forums talk about the best wheelsets for DH and FR and everyone seems to say, Sun Ringlé.
Sun Ringlé offers a wheelset called the A.D.D. on their site. They consist of the Sun Ringlé jumping flea hub, 15 guage straight spokes and Sun Ringlé 34mm MTX rims. (32 or 36 spoke) See below.
Which would be better, the OEM Bontrager King Earl set or the Sun Ringlé?
Is the Sun Ringlé jumping flea hub better than the Bontrager aluminum carbon fiber combo?
Would it be better to sell the Bontrager Wheelset or separate rim and hub, or as a set? They go for $550 on line.
**********
I've been on a Cane Creek Cloud Nine and have bee VERY pleased with the shock, performance and ride. This will be my first spring ride bike.
The King Fisher OEM shock is a FOX DHX 4.0 same as the 5.0 only no bottom out feature. Fox want's $150 labor and $65 for the part to make it a 5.0. I'm not blowing another $215 plus ship back and forth $20 for a bottom out feature.
The Fox DHX 4.0 has a manual turn spring preload, rebound, what they call pro-pedal to stop pedal bob located on the far end of the boost chamber and about 125lb boost chamber. No bottom out or compression but I believe the Pro-Pedal is their compression. So there are 3 adjusts and manual spring preload adjust.
Then there is the Manitou 6-way Swinger and the Manitou Revox speed sensitive Intrinsic. see here
The Manitou Swinger seems to have the most tuning ability but the Revox I hear is a better shock for some reason due to it's speed sensitive Intrinsic feature and we all know the Manitou Travis Triple Intrinsic is a top notch fork.
The Manitou Swinger has a manual turn spring preload, Rebound, SPV Platform Pressure, SPV Volume, Low Speed Compression, High Speed Compression.
The Manitou Revox Intrinsic is a "speed sensitive' intrinsic shock, that has a manual turn spring preload, rebound, Intrinsic Air, No-Tools Volume, high and low speed compression.
The Swinger seems to have the most adjustment nobs for tuning. However the Intrinsic feature of the Revox, Manitou stated was better due to it's speed sensitive intrinsic dampening.
Now onto the shock of the year for 2007. I'd say hand's down I'd buy a Cane Creek because I've had two AD-5's that eventually failed and Cane Creek is a great company that stands behind their product. Cane Creek handed me a Cloud Nine that I've had for about 6 years and it's exactly what I like, using my air pressure, compression, and rebound settings. I have no pedal bob, great compression dampening and rebound. So naturally I'm all ready to unload the Fox DHX on Ebay and go off and buy a Cane Creek Double Barrel just for Cane Creeks reliability and standing by me, their customer, after so many years.
The Cane Creek Double barrel though uses twin tube technology while the rest use a single tube. The Double Barrel has a manual turn spring preload, but separates the rebound and compression into two chambers.
There are separate high and low speed adjusts for the compression tube, and rebound tube thus controling the flow of oil through the valving more than single tube design.
Like all the other piggy back shocks mentioned, it too has an air boost chamber.
I really like the more tunable shock however Cane Creek's double barrel has a MAJOR drawback that I really don't like and it will probably be the only reason why I rule it out. Unlike it's competition, it does not have the easy of use when doing these adjustments in the woods. With the Manitou and Fox, all one needs is two fingers to turn the knobs to adjust the rebound and compression tuning. With the Cane Creek, you need a screwdriver and a 10 hex nut driver. So tuning the Cane Creek and making on-trail adjustments is going to be more of a pain than the other shocks. So is the twin tube technology really worth it until Cane Creek addresses the problem by switching from nut and screw driver adjusts to finger adjusts?
Which shock is better suited for DH/FR and more tunable.., the OEM Fox DHX 4.0 that came on the King Fisher 1, the Manitou 6-way Swinger, the Manitou Revox Intrinsic, or the Cane Creek Double Barrel, and why?
As to the fork and tires, I've already made up my mind. I'm selling the King Earl tires, for 2.5 Maxxis Minions and I'm swapping the single crown 1.5 inch steer tube Manitou Travis Intrinsic 180mm for a 1.8 inch Manitou Travis Triple Intrinsic 203mm. Which means the brand new Cane Creek 1.5 head set and the King Earl stem will be on Ebay too.
So I'd really appreciate some educated technological input as to what is better and why.
Thanks