Quantcast

Direct mount stems - good or bad idea ?

jungle

Monkey
Jan 11, 2006
357
0
Are direct mount stems a good or bad idea
with regards to unwanted twisting of forks whereas as
stem that's clamped on a steerer tube would tend to slip
in a big crash rather than twist the forks.
Just that i've had my lower crown on my boxxers crack
which i attributed to running a direct mount stem.
Anyone have any thoughts on
direct mount stems Vs steerer clamp stems ?
 

Zark

Hey little girl, do you want some candy?
Oct 18, 2001
6,254
7
Reno 911
For racing the direct stem will never be crooked after you slammed and tends to be stiffer.
I don't think a direct stem made any difference in a cracked crown, but thats total e-spec.
 

PatBranch

Turbo Monkey
Sep 24, 2004
10,451
9
wine country
I think it's much better. I don't see any reason to use a regular stem when using a DC fork.

A direct stem is lower, lighter, stiffer, and won't twist like one mounted on the steer tube when in a crash (i guess you could bend the bolts or something).
 

jungle

Monkey
Jan 11, 2006
357
0
It's for a 06 Boxxer running a tall top crown,
so there's more chance of twisting over running a flat top crown.
 

Bicyclist

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2004
10,152
2
SB
I just got an e13 stem today and it's near the weight of my Holzfeller stem and it's actually taller.
 

dw

Wiffle Ball ninja
Sep 10, 2001
2,943
0
MV
Bicyclist said:
I just got an e13 stem today and it's near the weight of my Holzfeller stem and it's actually taller.
What Holzfeller stem do you have? I dont know of any DH stem that is light as the e.thirteen stem, let alone a normal steerer tube clamp on stem. For example, I have a brand new Thomson XC 0X60 stem here and the Ali is 16 grams lighter. Not that 16 grams is a lot, but the thomson is a pretty light XC stem.

Dave
 

dw

Wiffle Ball ninja
Sep 10, 2001
2,943
0
MV
Good idea, better stiffness to weight ratio, dont have to worry about bars twisting when you crash, better feel in the bars IMO also.

Dave
 

Bicyclist

Turbo Monkey
Apr 4, 2004
10,152
2
SB
dw said:
What Holzfeller stem do you have? I dont know of any DH stem that is light as the e.thirteen stem, let alone a normal steerer tube clamp on stem. For example, I have a brand new Thomson XC 0X60 stem here and the Ali is 16 grams lighter. Not that 16 grams is a lot, but the thomson is a pretty light XC stem.

Dave
The Holzfeller is a bit heavier for sure. It's the 40mm 31.8mm.
 

dw

Wiffle Ball ninja
Sep 10, 2001
2,943
0
MV
I love the color of your bike Fraser, that thing looks sweet.

Dave
 

Eggzoi

Monkey
Jan 6, 2006
160
0
Australia
d-rod said:
how does a direct mount stem or any other stem for that matter exert any force directly on the lower crown that would cause it to crack?
I think it's already been answered wonderfully well.
TheInedibleHulk said:
I propose an alternate explanation... you are a hack.
 

Cave Dweller

Monkey
May 6, 2003
993
0
dw said:
Good idea, better stiffness to weight ratio, dont have to worry about bars twisting when you crash, better feel in the bars IMO also.

Dave
Sure, good idea race wise for world cup riders, no question.

But for us normal riders who pay for their stuff, is there any more chance of a bolt on stem causing damage to the fork in a crash vs a normal stem that is able to twist? For me at least, making stuff last is more important then a 100gram weight saving or a 0.05% increase in stiffness feel.
 

PepperJester

Monkey
Jul 9, 2004
798
19
Wolfville NS
Bad idea.

When you take a spill and have your bar drive in to the dirt the will push your crown into the frame, sure the bumpers take some impact away but not enuff. The frame will be damaged. Now with a steer tube mounted stem it can slip, deflecting allot of the force befor it ever gets a chance to dent your nice new $2000+ DH frame. Sure one can argue that with a standard stem you can still dent up a frame, but it will take a worse crash to do it.
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
PepperJester said:
Bad idea.

When you take a spill and have your bar drive in to the dirt the will push your crown into the frame, sure the bumpers take some impact away but not enuff. The frame will be damaged. Now with a steer tube mounted stem it can slip, deflecting allot of the force befor it ever gets a chance to dent your nice new $2000+ DH frame. Sure one can argue that with a standard stem you can still dent up a frame, but it will take a worse crash to do it.
Sorry, not the case. When those bars finish twisting you still end up putting the entire impact with the ground into your frame. The stem twisting is just delaying the inevitable.
 

bushrider

Monkey
Jul 4, 2006
146
0
NYC
My freind Cavedweller killed his old 30mm Dorados due to crashing with the intergrated stem.

With a non-intergrated stem when you say clip the bars at mach 9 the force causes the stem to twist around the steer tube. With an intergrated stem this force is tranferred to the top crown, fork legs, axle and arch. Cave Dweller crashed going full speed on a fast open DH course and this cracked his dorado's legs between the crowns instead of just twisting the stem on the steerer tube.

Intergrated stems are a bad idea.
I would never run one.
A good light stem like the X4 is barley heavier than an intergrated one.
You are much more likely to damage your fork in a crash with an intergrated stem.
 

Cave Dweller

Monkey
May 6, 2003
993
0
It may have, or it could have been because it was an upside down fork or any number of reasons really.

So far its all e-speculation, thats why it would be nice to hear from the designer of an integrated stem what his thoughts are on the matter.
 

jungle

Monkey
Jan 11, 2006
357
0
d-rod said:
how does a direct mount stem or any other stem for that matter exert any force directly on the lower crown that would cause it to crack?

Hack or not ?
If you are twisting your forks your lower crown is
taking a some force, might just be an isolated case
and i have no actual proof just speculation,
but i have a cracked lower crown to show for it, so was
just posting to see what other peoples experiences have been
with integrated stems.
 

trust4130

Monkey
Aug 16, 2005
203
0
Pennsylvania
Transcend said:
Sorry, not the case. When those bars finish twisting you still end up putting the entire impact with the ground into your frame. The stem twisting is just delaying the inevitable.
Well... maybe. Your statement that the stem twisting is delaying the inevitable is simply incorrect. What it is doing is providing an alternate path for the load / energy to disapate. Once the static friction of the stem clamp is overcome, it slips (or twist). The frictional resistance applied by the stem is now a function of kinetic friction, which may be less than static friction coefficients depending on the materials at the interface. For aluminum on steel, the static friction is less than the kinetic friction. For aluminum on aluminum, the opposite is true. Basically, the static frictional force is ramped up to a limiting value, at which point it then becomes kinetic. Of course, all of this is a function of how tight the stem is clamping the steerer tube.

That said, I would suspect that the damage mechanism is more likely related disapating the large amount of energy involved. For this, flexibility is your friend.

Bottom line is that you're probably screwed either way... and I'm going to sleep now.

P.S. I run a direct mount for various reason listed in previous posts.
 

Transcend

My Nuts Are Flat
Apr 18, 2002
18,040
3
Towing the party line.
trust4130 said:
Well... maybe. Your statement that the stem twisting is delaying the inevitable is simply incorrect. What it is doing is providing an alternate path for the load / energy to disapate. Once the static friction of the stem clamp is overcome, it slips (or twist). The frictional resistance applied by the stem is now a function of kinetic friction, which may be less than static friction coefficients depending on the materials at the interface. For aluminum on steel, the static friction is less than the kinetic friction. For aluminum on aluminum, the opposite is true. Basically, the static frictional force is ramped up to a limiting value, at which point it then becomes kinetic. Of course, all of this is a function of how tight the stem is clamping the steerer tube.

That said, I would suspect that the damage mechanism is more likely related disapating the large amount of energy involved. For this, flexibility is your friend.

Bottom line is that you're probably screwed either way... and I'm going to sleep now.

P.S. I run a direct mount for various reason listed in previous posts.
Oh i completely agree, but you aren't losing much energy simply by twisting the stem. Even with really tight bolts, when it goes, it goes.

You afren't gonna lose enough energy to keep from causing damage, thats for sure.
 

V-Dub GTI

Monkey
Jun 11, 2006
951
0
blah!
you could just run an 07 marzocchi 66 with 180mm of travel and not worry about smashing your frame with a DC fork! :)
 

dw

Wiffle Ball ninja
Sep 10, 2001
2,943
0
MV
bushrider said:
With a non-intergrated stem when you say clip the bars at mach 9 the force causes the stem to twist around the steer tube.
You should tighten your stem before you get hurt. Running brake levers a little loose, OK. Running your stem loose, maybe not be the best idea for keeping yourself in one piece...

Just tryin' to help.

Dave
 

DerekJ

Monkey
Mar 6, 2006
151
0
Taichung, Taiwan
jungle said:
Hack or not ?
If you are twisting your forks your lower crown is
taking a some force, might just be an isolated case
and i have no actual proof just speculation,
but i have a cracked lower crown to show for it, so was
just posting to see what other peoples experiences have been
with integrated stems.
i never stated or implied that anyone was a hack...just curious as to what your take on it was since ive never actually cracked a crown,.. only stantions.
 

trust4130

Monkey
Aug 16, 2005
203
0
Pennsylvania
Transcend said:
Oh i completely agree, but you aren't losing much energy simply by twisting the stem. Even with really tight bolts, when it goes, it goes.

You afren't gonna lose enough energy to keep from causing damage, thats for sure.
I'd agree. I also think that the handlebars would probably suffer some damage as well. I can only guess that you'd need to run the stem pretty loose in order to assure that you don't cause damage to either the frame or bars, but then you'd be straightening the darn thing out with every minor spill.

Now the question is: does anyone have any real world experience where they have caused damage to their frame as we've been discussing? I'd be more than willing to eat my words if so.
 

bushrider

Monkey
Jul 4, 2006
146
0
NYC
Seriously the stem is plenty tight.
I dont run it loose.
It only twists when I crash really hard.
There is no added danger as I've allready crashed when the stem twists.

Seriously for everyone bar pro racers a intergrated stem is just a bad idea. Handlebars have a lot of leverage. When you clip a tree at full race pace thats a lot of force that neednt be transfered to the fork. Combine this with questionable weight savings.

Also I dont agree with the argument that the stem twisting is not dissipating much of the force. Even if this is the case the that hardly matters. Once the stem has twisted the bars have cleared the tree you just hit so your forks and frame are probably safe.

On the trails I ride clipping a tree with your handlebars is one of the more common ways to crash. I've bent a lot of bars that way and many times I've bent a bar and the stem has only twisted 20 degrees or less. That indicates to me that at least on a ALU steerer there is a lot of friction happening.

Basically by running an intergrated stem your fork is going to see a lot more force trasferred from imapcts to the handlebars. Handlebars in my expiriece often get served a lot of force in a crash.

Why dont you get 2 bikes the same one with a stem and another with a stoke and drop them sideways over and over until one of the forks sustains some serious dammage. I bet the fork with the stoke is the 1st one to break.

Or even better get someone seriously strong to put the front wheel between their legs and try and twist the bars until something breaks. I bet that if you can find someone strong enough they will break something on the fork (probably the top crown) before they break the stem or bars. And with the non intergrated stem your just going to end up twisting the stem around the steerer.
 

Dogboy

Turbo Monkey
Apr 12, 2004
3,209
585
Durham, NC
bushrider, you describe clipping a tree and crashing as if the bike is immobile when it happens and all force is transferred to the fork. I've found that clipping a tree usually ends up spinning the bike around and me ragdolling off into rocks, more trees, etc.
 

bushrider

Monkey
Jul 4, 2006
146
0
NYC
But all I'm saying is that when the bars impact with someting then then its likely more force will be transferred to the fork with an intergrated stem than with a regular stem.

I cant see how anyone can possibly argue that this is not the case.
So basically you ARE at GREATER risk of damaging your fork when your bars hit something hard.

So I think that the orginal posters concerns that an intergrated stem may have contributed to his bottom crown breaking is a valid concern. Weather or not this would have happen with a regular stem, dunno. Its certainly more likely to happen with an intergrated stem IMHO.