what would you prefer it in? what ratio are you shooting when you make a film?just disappointed that its in 4:3 and 16:9. From a videographer's standpoint, that just makes it a PITA to incorporate with reg HD footage.
whoops meant to say 4:3 and NOT 16:9. All HD shot on handheld cams is 16:9.what would you prefer it in? what ratio are you shooting when you make a film?
okay, i was trying to figure out else you mighta been shooting in.whoops meant to say 4:3 and NOT 16:9. All HD shot on handheld cams is 16:9.
I shoot in ratios of piokay, i was trying to figure out else you mighta been shooting in.
The overall visual appearance of the high definition GoPro HD Wide is pretty much the same – but the insides of the GoPro HD are very different and the specs tell the full story! The GoPro HD still has the killer 170 degree wide angle lens and will have three recording resolutions: 1080p (1980 x 1080), 960p (1280×960, so it’s similar to 720p but at 4:3 ratio), and 720p (1280 x 720). What’s even better is the camera can record 720p at double speed 60 FPS for buttery smooth high-def slow motion deliciousness. Here are the full video specs with bitrates, please note bitrates may change in final production version:
* 1080P 1980×1080 30 fps @12 Mbps
* 960P 1280×960, 30 fps @ 10 Mbps
* 720P 1280×720, 30 fps @ 7.5 Mbps
* 720P 1280×720, 60 fps @ 15 Mbps
dl the pdf, its only 300Looks great, did they release any info on a price?
i didnt even see that one on there.....Vholdr all the way. better cam then the GoProVholdr just announced that the new ContourHD will ALSO be 1080p!!! HOT DAMN!
http://www.engadget.com/2009/09/29/vholdr-contourhd1080p-helmet-cam-announced-we-go-hands-on/
most helmet cams besides the Vio have everything internally. the Vio has a video cable tether to it recording/viewing unitLooks like they have the data and batteries all inside the camera if I'm seeing it right.
Yea, a couple years ago I had the separate helmet cam with a Canon camcorder. It sucked. I had it in a small Pelican case because I was worried about breaking the camera. Then I had to run the a/v cables and microphone, along with power cable to the camera...it was a PITA, so I rarely used it. One of these setups would be so much more fun.most helmet cams besides the Vio have everything internally. the Vio has a video cable tether to it recording/viewing unit
thats actually still a better way than these helmet cams. the newer smaller "bullet" type cams attached to a recording device are betterYea, a couple years ago I had the separate helmet cam with a Canon camcorder. It sucked. I had it in a small Pelican case because I was worried about breaking the camera. Then I had to run the a/v cables and microphone, along with power cable to the camera...it was a PITA, so I rarely used it. One of these setups would be so much more fun.
well i was being realistic id rather just have it be a ccdand a global shutter and a bigger sensor
I thought that was an earthquake at 1:54 in the skydiving vid.and a global shutter
why would an earthquake make footage of someone cliff jumping shaky?I thought that was an earthquake at 1:54 in the skydiving vid.
Because the earth moves while the subject is suspended above it?why would an earthquake make footage of someone cliff jumping shaky?
i know, i was tooIt was a joke. The reason it looks like jello is because of the rolling shutter IH8RICE referenced. And that clip alone will keep me from ever buying one of these things to use for biking.
*sigh*The footage looks amazing.
Here's the thing though. CMOS sensors aren't really any different price-wise from CCD cameras to make. Manufacturers are just being lazy. And as long as people are fine with it nothing will change. People are obsessing over HD this and HD that instead of actually getting a good picture, which has very little to do with pixel count. My frustration is that people aren't bringing it up so manufacturers don't know they should make some more options. But to willingly include a rolling shutter system on a camera that by design will be moving and shaking is absolutely retarded.I seriously doubt you will find better footage for $269US. Sure you can get the Sony HCR MC1 at a cool $3k, but even that uses a CMOS sensor and that's according to Sony a "professional level POV camera", so they can't be that bad.
No idea what sort of shutter it uses.
I just did a little reading and it seems like yes, they are a bit retarded for using a CMOS sensor. Didn't really under stand the whole rolling shutter thing until now. It's not like we'll be really worried about smear. It doesn't seem to be as noticable on the GoPro as on the Vholdr which shakes to all buggery.Here's the thing though. CMOS sensors aren't really any different price-wise from CCD cameras to make. Manufacturers are just being lazy. And as long as people are fine with it nothing will change. People are obsessing over HD this and HD that instead of actually getting a good picture, which has very little to do with pixel count. My frustration is that people aren't bringing it up so manufacturers don't know they should make some more options. But to willingly include a rolling shutter system on a camera that by design will be moving and shaking is absolutely retarded.
1:54 in the sky diving vid. Is that really what the earth looks like?It doesn't seem to be as noticable on the GoPro as on the Vholdr which shakes to all buggery.
We'll just have to just disagree on that one.Yeah I saw that and yet the mtb clips look fine.