While I see your point, I guess you could say that some people might really want that extra travel with the M3....ahem Edddd Buchan. :love:jackalope said:^^
Yup...Although it seems like it would sorta compete against the M3...I mean, it *sounds* basically like a light weight M3...
Except it has less travel, is front derailleur compatible, and offers more seat height adjustment :love: ink:jackalope said:^^
Yup...Although it seems like it would sorta compete against the M3...I mean, it *sounds* basically like a light weight M3...
I need something in the back that's more like a Maxxis "2.5" than say a Kenda "2.5"
Mountain Bike Fiction? I don't think they've ever published an accurate frame weight...Cant Climb said:MBA says its 8 pounds......
edited it for you.Cant Climb said:MBA says its 8 pounds...... with out a shox
Intergalactic junk pile.jackalope said:And hopefully nowhere near as clapped out...
I agree 100%.Zark said:This is a type of bike thats going to flourish, its versatile and fits the bill for lot of people in a lot of places. I don't think it will supplant more traditional big bikes though, since there are places that warrant the big guns.
I agree also. I am equal distance between Sea Otter and Cougar Mountain and these types of bikes are the ticket. I don't race anymore and sold my big DH bike, these these new smaller, lighter bikes (Socom, Demo7) are what will get me back into it. Easier to take on the local dh-type trails as well.Dogboy said:I agree 100%.
The 6.6 is the equivalent of the Nomad.S.K.C. said:Hey - just wondering - since Intense and Santa Cruz share a lot of design specs and technology - isn't the SOCOM Intense Cycles iteration of the Santa Cruz Nomad???
BAM! Truth, right in the forehead.leprechaun said:Really cool bike for someone like myself who needs a light bike,
For each rider i know looking for a light DH bike i know 3 who have just broken their DH bike and can't afford to fix it.
I have to agree with Jeff on this one, Intense doesn't exactly have a great track record on this stuff.dropmachine.com said:Lets take a bike right out off Intense's history sheet for that one. THe lighter the M1 got, the more it broke. SNapped stays, headtubes, blah blah balh.
Its jsut kinda scary thinking about people buying into the hype, and getting totalled when the bike doesn't stand up to the abuse.
julian_dh said:they have never had a bike more on target than this.
I've kinda hoped they turned a new leaf on that issue. I haven't heard of any issues with the M3 or VPX bikes.Transcend said:I have to agree with Jeff on this one, Intense doesn't exactly have a great track record on this stuff.