Seen it yet? Crap that was a long movie--just over 3 hours. I thought it was really good. Good plot and very creative. I liked it when he beat the sh!t out of those 3 T-rexs with the girl in one hand.
I give it
I give it
stevew said:I'd say for Peter Jacksons next movie, he had better ditch his wife and their partner, because the dialogue in that movie made the dialogue in the Star Wars prequels sound good.
Um, King Kong is supposed to be a fantastical adventure... i.e. not real, just like LOTR. It holds very true to the first.BeerDemon said:Finally saw it. Visuals were stunning but the action was the usual over the top crap. As if fighting one Trex wouldn't have been an epic battle, they had to throw in two more, have Kong holding the girl the whole time, swinging from vines for pets sake. Stupid. I've never seen so many things fall off cliffs and not die (or get hurt). I guess that's why Skull Island has all those big critters - low gravity.
And then we had the crew stampeding with the dinosaurs LOL! Here's a tip: if a bunch of dinosaurs are running you down a canyon, simply step off to the side into one of the many shletered spots and defend yourself from the biting ones WITH YOUR FREAKIN MACHINE GUNS
My favorite part though, was when the bugs are crawling all over the Pianist and the kid is shooting them off with an automatic weapon, half the time with his eyes closed. If our armed forces had half the talent that kid did, Iraq would be neatly under control right now.
Rating: retahded.
Uh, there are fantastical adventures that still adhere to the laws of physics. There is a point where too much is too much. Holds true to what? The original King Kong?kinghami3 said:Um, King Kong is supposed to be a fantastical adventure... i.e. not real, just like LOTR. It holds very true to the first.
Yes, the original King Kong, IMHO. I don't know why you can have people survive after falling into a muddy pit, versus hobbits taking on a cave troll... seems like a double standard to say that some kinds of fantastical adventure can be only plausible while others can't.BeerDemon said:Uh, there are fantastical adventures that still adhere to the laws of physics. There is a point where too much is too much. Holds true to what? The original King Kong?
Why are we even talking about LOTR?kinghami3 said:Yes, the original King Kong, IMHO. I don't know why you can have people survive after falling into a muddy pit, versus hobbits taking on a cave troll... seems like a double standard to say that some kinds of fantastical adventure can be only plausible while others can't.
Because I'm using it as a comparison, that's why.BeerDemon said:Why are we even talking about LOTR?
Bad comparison. LOTR has no basis in our world, while King Kong is based in our world.kinghami3 said:Because I'm using it as a comparison, that's why.
No, it's a perfectly good comparison... Neither movie takes place in our world, unless you believe 30 ft. apes exist The physics and outcomes of similar fights would be the comparable in each world; which are both based off of ours. All I'm trying to say is that faulting a fantasy movie for being fantastical doesn't make much sense to me..:Jeenyus:. said:Bad comparison. LOTR has no basis in our world, while King Kong is based in our world.
It was a terrrrrible movie.
I'm not faulting it for being fantastical, I'm faulting it for being stupid. Why not have 10 Trex and make it a crouching tiger hidden dragon style rumble? And then the Aliens show up for good measure.kinghami3 said:No, it's a perfectly good comparison... Neither movie takes place in our world, unless you believe 30 ft. apes exist The physics and outcomes of similar fights would be the comparable in each world; which are both based off of ours. All I'm trying to say is that faulting a fantasy movie for being fantastical doesn't make much sense to me.
I found TheMatrix, when dude had to fight 10,000 Mr. Andersons, pretty dumb. I didnt think 3 T-Rex's was quite that stupid.BeerDemon said:I'm not faulting it for being fantastical, I'm faulting it for being stupid. Why not have 10 Trex and make it a crouching tiger hidden dragon style rumble? And then the Aliens show up for good measure.
There's fantasy and there is just dumb.
Yeah I'm not saying the Trex scene was the worst, those scenes you mentioned are pretty high on the stupid scale too.BurlyShirley said:I found TheMatrix, when dude had to fight 10,000 Mr. Andersons, pretty dumb. I didnt think 3 T-Rex's was quite that stupid.
The movie was pretty stupid I thought, but not because of any of that...but some other scenes. Like for instance, those big ass bats in the cave, why didnt they eat that one guy? And the Dino chase scene..retarded.
ayup, it could have been about 15 minutes shorter. It seemed like it went on forever.BurlyShirley said:And the Dino chase scene..retarded.
It's worth seeing. It's a little, ok - a lot, over the top, but worth seeing. National Treasure was good though.I Are Baboon said:I have not seen it but it's available On Demand this month. Is it worth the $4 rental?
I watched "National Treasure" on HBO last night. Not bad.
IMO it's worth seeing just for the shots of old New York.I Are Baboon said:I have not seen it but it's available On Demand this month. Is it worth the $4 rental?
I watched "National Treasure" on HBO last night. Not bad.
.:Jeenyus:. said:It was a terrrrrible movie.
They attached him to those giant bats and flew him home. Duh.manimal said:i thought it was entertaining but they kinda left ouf the part that discussed the logistics of fitting that mega-monkey on that ship.
he was in the jungle, then suddenly appeared in NYC
Didn't you read the book??? The giant bats flapped the villagers into a trance and they welded the hull of the ship, even though it was bashed to hell against the rocks. They used uber snuber dinosaur bones and tigged that puppy to health. They also repaired the motor and it was only a 45 minute trip.BeerDemon said:They attached him to those giant bats and flew him home. Duh.
MtnBikerChk said:I'm bumping this thread because we are (finally) watching this movie. We are just about an hour and 10 minutes in and FINALLY we see Kong.
Less talky - more monkey.
Seriously, this movie is moving slower than me on an uphill xc ride.
Thanks.N8 said:monkey dies..
Son of KongMtnBikerChk said:2. I don't have to worry about a sequel.