Any out ther got this setup out there?
Looks like I have to machine some mm. from the back of the spider?
Espen
Looks like I have to machine some mm. from the back of the spider?
Espen
Middleburn DUAL 110/DHR04/113mm BB and a SRS????
- Thread starter Espen
- Start date
I am wondering if this has to do with the frame. I (as Acadian and I have conversed about a few times) have run 3 different sets of Middleburn cranks, even with a 108mm spindle and haev had no clearance issues with STS and SRS guides. The distance from ring to ring on every crank is basically (should be) the same yes (spider is of same thickness no matter what)? So why would the Middleburn cranks have a problem yet others would not?
I think the Middleburn spiders got more offset.
When I place the complete arm with bash and chainring, it's impossible to get the alignment ridge flush with the bash.
I did run a SRS with the same BB and Spider on my 01 DHR and can't remember the same issues. Maybe it did't came out perfect, my 02 SRS did't got the alignment ridge.
I am talking about 1-2mm
Espen
When I place the complete arm with bash and chainring, it's impossible to get the alignment ridge flush with the bash.
I did run a SRS with the same BB and Spider on my 01 DHR and can't remember the same issues. Maybe it did't came out perfect, my 02 SRS did't got the alignment ridge.
I am talking about 1-2mm
Espen
Thats odd with the dual spider, it should be offset enough to clear. Or does your spider have the holes for the granny gear. (nondual)
ink: ehh....actually it fits, with a few mm's. I was a litle dizzy when I was wrenching last night.Sorry guys.......
Espen
Sounds like Luc when he's trying to bleed his brakesOriginally posted by Espen
Sorry guys.......
Espen
AT least, I do'nt have problems with bleeding.
e
e
Originally posted by Espen
AT least, I do'nt have problems with bleeding.
e
