This is pretty much just incorrect. I don't have a clue where you are getting 3 to 5 times as much for 4 stroke maintenance. The main difference between 4s and 2s is the addition of a valve train. It's true this is one of the most common points of maintenance on the 4 stroke. You also have an oil circuit that isnt there on the 2 stoke. I cracked an engine case on my kawi and did a complete bottom end replacement as well as a new piston. The cost was about 1400 dollars in parts, built the motor myself. Had the same problem occured on a two stroke, the same list of parts would be about 1000. But the truth is, with the level at which most people ride, if you start with a decently fresh bike, odds are you are never going to have a catastrophic failure. If you ride a bike for several years you are probably going to be looking at valve replacement, but that's about it. As far as a 4 stroke being slower, that's just dumb, sure the displacement is bigger, but who cares? What matters is fuel consumption and weight, and power. Weight is a bit higher, but fuel consumption is far better. The difference is that a 4 stroke makes torque and power through much more the the powerband, make it more usuable and tractable. All that put aside, anyone who knows their asshole from their earhole knows that a 4 stroke is faster around the track. There is a good reason why everyone in motocross switched. Even with the rule that allowed 250 two strokes to compete in the 250f class this past season, very few bothered. Peak power may be way higher, but it's usable power that matters.I have a 4 stroke but wish I had bought a two stroke. Cheaper and less maint. I will say that the reason Honda, Kawi, Yam., Suz went 4 stroke also has to do with factory mechanics doing motor builds on 2 strokes for $200.
The 4 stroke is 3-5X that much cash and most people dont want to spend the time. And if a 4 stroke needs 2X the CC size to compete then well the are SLOWER! Ok but easier to ride.