Sweet sweet sitePip3r said:not that it has any relevance to what you need, but if youve seen the movie donnie darko then check this out its WACK... www.donniedarko.com
Sweet sweet sitePip3r said:not that it has any relevance to what you need, but if youve seen the movie donnie darko then check this out its WACK... www.donniedarko.com
Considering I am on an 8Mbit connection and a 3Mbit connetion, I highly doubt it.atrokz said:takes about 10 seconds over here.
Maybe quebec's service installed your cables backwards
but anyways, their site is jsut for show of what is capable with flash. It's cool, and it has good visuals.
For a more "user friendly site" DW, check out: http://www.hjchelmets.com/
very easy to flow through.
that was cool for like 3 minutes then i couldnt go anywhere... nothing worked.... i lost intrest.....Pip3r said:not that it has any relevance to what you need, but if youve seen the movie donnie darko then check this out its WACK... www.donniedarko.com
SPoken like an individual with aboslutely no style.Transcend said:It serves 0 purpose. Flash serves almost no use 99.9% of the time.
Sure thing buddy. Remember that most of the users on the internet are still on dialup. IE: flash only serves the purpose of wasting bandwidth and time. Sound ads NOTHING to a website. 0. Nada.dropmachine.com said:SPoken like an individual with aboslutely no style.
Sound has an excellent purpose, TO MAKE NOISE. Its an excellent tool to add a little style to your site, as long as its not too intrusive and doesn't shoot the load times through the roof. Flash is the same. Used correctly, it adds style that nothing else can compare to.
From the way you talk, all websites should be text on a white background.
Again, I will point out that even on dial up, if done correctly flash can load quickly and play efficiently. And again, flash can add a style element that cannot be duplicated by anything else out there.Transcend said:Sure thing buddy. Remember that most of the users on the internet are still on dialup. IE: flash only serves the purpose of wasting bandwidth and time. Sound ads NOTHING to a website. 0. Nada.
When i mouseover a link, I don't want it to snap crackle or pop. I just want it to take me somwhere useful (which should be clearly defined). I want content. Substance is 100x more important than wank presentation.
On point one, i agree, only most of the time it isn't done tastefully or efficiently. Flash for the sake of flash is retarded. Flash for content (ie: the ski run maps) is super efficient and really the only way to do it.dropmachine.com said:Again, I will point out that even on dial up, if done correctly flash can load quickly and play efficiently.
Sound is the same thing. Its a small thing, but it can add a style element and entertains viewers like nothing else. It doesn't have to be huge, or overwhelming, but it does have its place.
And since when does using flash or sound mean that content gets sacrificed? Theres no rule that says you can have one or the other.
I fart in your general direction!dropmachine.com said:On that we agree. That Donnie Darko is a great example of that. I couldn't figure it out, and it was annoying.
I am going to hack Transcend tonight and add 6 meg flash intros with techno music and monty python quotes when you mouse over anything.
its like a game, and it solves the movie for you basically. i havnt done the whole thing yet i need to watch the movie again. its damn creative you gotta give it that, and almost creepyoly said:that was cool for like 3 minutes then i couldnt go anywhere... nothing worked.... i lost intrest.....
I really dig the flash stuff that Volkswagon uses on their site. It loads up pretty quickly and if you want vw nerd info it's presented in a really good way. Click on any model car and then go to the engineering section. You can then click on engines and get a breakdown of all of the availble options and how they are all different. Very cool. It's seems like a good mix where you have easy navigation but with informative and visually interesting content.Transcend said:On point one, i agree, only most of the time it isn't done tastefully or efficiently. Flash for the sake of flash is retarded. Flash for content (ie: the ski run maps) is super efficient and really the only way to do it.
On point 2, we will agree to disagree. I think sound on a website is distracting. Most of that goes to point one again, almost always done with gaudy techno and loud annoying mouse over blings.
point 3 once again comes back to both of the above, flash doesnt mean content has to be sacrificed (again ski thing, custom car thing from subaru etc), only the vast majority of times it is horrid. It seemslike these hacks put 100 hours of work into a flashy blingin' display, and forget that the site is there for another reason.
Remember that altho it is entertaining, the point of every site out there, bar almost none, is to convery some sort of content. Be it news, images, product details, an opinion etc. You have a website for a reason...if figuring out what that is takes forever, it is a waste of money.
My biggest irk are sites that have GREAT content, decent presentation, but that have a navigation system so ridiculous that the site is unuseable. Those annoy me to no end.
EXACTLY, that took some serious time, but not an optimal websitedropmachine.com said:Its neat, but its also got all the problems that pure flash sites have, ie. no favorites, can't just click back, can't save pics...
it also gets annoying to surf the 4th or 5th time.