Well, i´ve been thinking of buying one of those frames....well hard decision...
your opinion?
thanx!!
your opinion?
thanx!!
ViciousDHer said:Buy American :angry:
you'll see the morewood trailer at all the Nationals this year if that helps...Laaz said:Well, i´ve been thinking of buying one of those frames....well hard decision...
your opinion?
thanx!!
OK...I don't ride either bike...but what you just said is funny...explain please. what makes it "more competitive"?SBDHrida said:I'd say 224 because it seems like a more competitive race bike, but I haven't ridden either so my opinion might not be the best.
I'm wondering the same thing myself. If peaty made it more competitive, i musta brought that average down, in some way shape or form.bizutch said:OK...I don't ride either bike...but what you just said is funny...explain please. what makes it "more competitive"?
I hope you are not talking to me?bizutch said:delete the thread...it just got crapped in...
I fail to see the logic here.tomvan72 said:Keep in mind that the Morewood Izimu dh is a race bred bike. Built by 3 time South Afican champion Patrick Morewood. In the past year, 3 us riders were selected for the national team to go to worlds. They were all on Morewoods. I did not see any americans on an Orange. Not to say anything bad about the 224 of course.
konabiker said:I fail to see the logic here.
The Logic being based on the fact that the bike is a true race bike. Makes since to me. Both bikes are race bikes. OHHHH more logic.
tomvan72 said:Well he isn't alone. Why should he keep in mind that the morewood is a race bike? The 224 is an ultra lightweight race only bike as well...konabiker said:I fail to see the logic here.
The Logic being based on the fact that the bike is a true race bike. Makes since to me. Both bikes are race bikes. OHHHH more logic.
So clarify for me and the rest of the confused souls here, what exactly should he be keeping in mind?
Transcend said:So clarify for me and the rest of the confused souls here, what exactly should he be keeping in mind?
Gotcha, i sincerly had no idea what you meant. Sorry.tomvan72 said:The logic might just be in my head! At some point I thought someone hinted to the 224 being more of a race bike. I was stating that the Izimu is on par. I must not have explained it well enuff. So dont worry about it too much. I'll try better next time!
Although I agree that new shocks help make single pivots acceptable in terms of pedaling performance, all the platform damping in the world won't do much to minimize feedback. You hit a bump, your suspension compresses, you get chain growth, and if it's a lot, you'll feel it in the pedals. Sure, you can minimize the amount of that compression but pivot location still makes a big difference. Did you mean to say something else?IronhorseCT said:In all honesty, pivot placement with today's shocks means very little when it comes to pedal feedback.
WheelieMan said:Hey Morewood people, whatever happened to this idea? Was it scrapped?:
http://www.morewoodbikes.com/chain.html
ha! someone finally did what i had abandonned in my bike design a long time ago. It's simply an idler freely mounted to an arm that pivots about the main pivot. The position of that idler is maintained by the chain tension, allowing the idler to move in a position that reduces chain 'lengthening'. It was actually one of my original premises for the design (and some projects), but never got tested tho. Never published this pic before either, taken april 2003 just after first assembly, the front end didnt get built until later in the year. Parts werent even anodized yet....MOTODH said:hmm thats pretty cool, is it spring loaded or something? any info
zedro said:ha! someone finally did what i had abandonned in my bike design a long time ago. It's simply an idler freely mounted to an arm that pivots about the main pivot. The position of that idler is maintained by the chain tension, allowing the idler to move in a position that reduces chain 'lengthening'. It was actually one of my original premises for the design (and some projects), but never got tested tho. Never published this pic before either, taken april 2003 just after first assembly, the front end didnt get built until later in the year. Parts werent even anodized yet....