at least it isn't a perceived slight of a figment of their imagination....Indeed, its pretty hard to rein-in rioting sports fans...
lolWhich errors would those be again? Remember, Red = 10 states w/ highest % of non-payers, Blue = 10 states w/ lowest %.
It's not stating Republican/Democrat. (see Legend in lower left-hand corner)
Religious Right activists have been the most vocal supporters of the filmmakers, if you can call them that, and have rightfully pointed out that the First Amendment protects their activities. Starnes, however, seems to have a double-standard when it comes to speech that he deems offensive to his religious views.
As it turns out, the only investigation going on around the “Innocence of Muslims” concerns whether one of the purported “filmmakers” violated the terms of his probation. Otherwise the government has no place policing speech, regardless of who is offended, and the president is not the film critic in chief. President Obama can be excused, however, for speaking out when Americans are being killed over an amateurish YouTube video.
What if we are offended by both the random chick and a presidential candidate. I'm not voting for either of them.
...and your problem is??it will never cease to astonish me, how people from a well-off country full of uninsured people think universal healthcare is a bad thing; but having AR15s readily available at walmart is a matter of national necessity.