Rc4 for sure. Double barell may be better damping wise but the 224 is degressive if I remember right. A progressive shock like the rc4 should help that a lot.
Rc4 for sure. Double barell may be better damping wise but the 224 is degressive if I remember right. A progressive shock like the rc4 should help that a lot.
Rc4 for sure. Double barell may be better damping wise but the 224 is degressive if I remember right. A progressive shock like the rc4 should help that a lot.
Yeah, I had heard the db worked the best but, that was before the rc4 so, now it's hard to say.
Right now I have a dx 5.0 that was pushed. It did feel a bit better but, not what I thought it would be. I don't like the idea of my shock being filled with nitrogen because I can't adjust it unless I empty it and fill it back up with air.
Well then it comes down to preferences. In this case you have to choose whether you want the bike to ramp a bit more and feel more "lively", or whether you want superior damping and adjustability.
But if the 224 really is degressive, I would think about another damper for it.
In my (progressive) Commencal Supreme DH, the bottom out resistance feels just perfect. I would hate having to run more high speed compression because of an less progressive rear end...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.