assuming the DHR2 EXO up front?Prefer 2.4 WT minion on i25 up front, and 2.3 on i25 for the rear tire.
Makes the bike nice and loose, which I like. No trouble finding the corner knobs.
Takeaway: bike setup is personal to each rider and the terrain they ride.
Yeah wut?what makes the bike nice and loose?
They were designed for 21-25mm rims I think. So the profile should be about right on traditional rim widths.
The new WT casings are designed for >30mm rims.
Gonna throw a DHF 2.5 WT on my 25mm rims and see how it goes. I'm currently switching between 2.3 DHF and 2.35 MM when things get steeper but I still want more traction in some places so I'm gonna see how the 2.5 works on a narrow rim. Will report back.
yes, DHR2 exo.assuming the DHR2 EXO up front?
what makes the bike nice and loose?
No one is racing on rims bigger than 30 so there's no need.Fair point, though I don’t believe the WT is generally used for DH racing, regardless of rim width.
Size may have more info on that.
interesting, thanks. what's the terrain you ride?For this rider, and the terrain I ride, i25 with 2.4 WT tires was preferred. I went from i25 to i30 because #trend and went right back to i25.
I am in the Utah Wasatch, so mostly dry/dusty/rocky/natural trails.interesting, thanks. what's the terrain you ride?
Fair point, though I don’t believe the WT is generally used for DH racing, regardless of rim width.
Poster ‘Size may have more info on that.
a quick sampling (6 different rims on recent WC podium bikes) shows an average of 28mm internal, ranging from 25mm (ex471) to 31mm (lg1 race). no WT tires are being used.No one is racing on rims bigger than 30 so there's no need.
Do you mean no WT tires in your 6 item sample, or no WT tires at all? I Ass-Guy you mean just the sample of 6....a quick sampling (6 different rims on recent WC podium bikes) shows an average of 28mm internal, ranging from 25mm (ex471) to 31mm (lg1 race). no WT tires are being used.
No, we need something that we can identify with. Something that is revolutionary. I think we need a new standard!We need rim narrowing strips for tires that are too square.
i meant no WT at all. i was wrong. i saw that tire, knew i'd never run it and didn't do any research on it.Do you mean no WT tires in your 6 item sample, or no WT tires at all? I Ass-Guy you mean just the sample of 6....
....'Cause Maxxis site says the Ass-Guy is only available in WT?
First world problems are a biatch, ain't them?Well Hell.
No Alex Volar 3.0 in stock at the distro.
No more coming in.
As well, the fuckers didn't even bring the 26" into Canukistan .
I think I will end up with Stans on the DH bike, they are easy to source, if a bit pricey (2+ x the Alex cost each)
I also am finally done with the 819's I have on a trailbike.
This can also be run with a 27.5 front (original 26/27.5 Mattoc fork) which I am considering.
So now thinking another set of 26/27.5 30mm id rimz.
...and my google fu still sucks trying to find the Alex rims which would work great for both trail and dh bikes especially when I can do both bikes for less than the cost of one pair of Stan's...
Third world options, hehe. Here we have "Vision" wide rims (and many others by Chinese/Taiwanese companies).First world problems are a biatch, ain't them?
Seriously, try to find the Alex MD30. Only a slight weight penalty over the Volar, identical inner width, cheaper and stronger.
EDIT: Another good alternative is the Octane One Solar Pro rim, still available in 26 inches and with 29mm of inner width:
https://26bikes.com/shop/parts/rims-and-rim-tapes/dirt-street/prod/oo-solar-pro-17
The main point of running a wider rim is to have a rim width/bead width that is more proportional/appropriate to tread width/contact patch.I thought squaring off the tire was the whole point of running a wide rim.
Spank, if only for sidewall width. Spike is (33-28)/2=2.5mm thick. Flow is (32.3-29)/2=1.65mm thick.For the DH bike, Realistically I'm not going to be able to talk myself into a set of TeamIssue only rims, so I'm thinking it is between Spank Spike Race 33 or Stanley NoTubes Flow Mk3.
Rim................................Flow Mk.3.......Spike Race33
Hole...............................32....................32
Width - external...........32.3mm..........33mm
Width - internal............29mm.............28mm
Height...........................17.6mm...........22mm
Material........................6069.................Custom 6 series
Weight - 26...................459gm..............480gm
Weight - 27.5................480gm..............500gm
Cost...............................93.79ea............86.39ea (Canukistani funds)
I'm leaning toward the Spanks, not sure why, but I can get them with sweet yellow lettering to not match the other various yellow / gold / golden-orange bits and bobs on teh bike.
Thoughts ? Which way would you jump...
That was basically the only deciding factor why I was thinking Spank - I have "heard of" people guillotining tires on pinching due to the narrow rim profile on Stans.... The toobless thing does not really worry me. Anything I'm going to run is TL ready....Spank, if only for sidewall width. Spike is (33-28)/2=2.5mm thick. Flow is (32.3-29)/2=1.65mm thick.
However, IME, the other big consideration in Spank vs Stans is that Stans will seal a non-tubeless tire tubeless, while the Spanks won't. I used to run an OG DH-casing Highroller on my old school Flow, but when I tried to run the same tire tubeless on my Spanks it was a no-go.
Fratelli industries is Spank. Same material, different rim design?
Often wondered. They are the only other company to use the mythical "Dynamal" alloy that I have seen.Fratelli industries is Spank. Same material, different rim design?
Yup their rim tape works the best on the Spank rims as wellFratelli industries is Spank. Same material, different rim design?
"According to a spokesman the start in rims was out of frustration with its suppliers that instead of the required 6061 alloy frequently delivered the rims in 6005 quality."Often wondered. They are the only other company to use the mythical "Dynamal" alloy that I have seen.
The WT is a larger casing designed to keep the tire from becoming too square on wide rims (30mm - 40mm). An overly square profile will roll slower since more tire is touching the ground on average. The square profile will also make the bike feel like it resists leaning into corners.I'm still not really sure what the WT is supposed to do.@rockofullr those were on the bike you rode at Demo and Sea Otter, 2.5 WT High rollers fr and rr. If I recall, you weren't a big fan of the front??? But that got better after DVO worked on the fork? Can't remember.
Hot tip, if you're running that HRII on the front you should try swapping them front and rear (DHR up front, HR out back). You'll probably end up with better cornering traction and lower rolling resistance.It seems my fastest, best handling bikes are still on 2.3 High roller/DHR combo. I30 rims.