The point is, where are BMXers supposed to ride if they're not allowed to ride anywhere else.. They should have a place where it is LEGAL to ride and where they can be held responsible for their own injuries/actions.. I mean Kids getting arrested for riding their BIKES... BIKES.. riding their BIKKES!!!.... While they are bustin bikers, there are people either dying or gettin sold drugs.they dont expect their own park, they just want it so they can be there with everyone else.webb said:that's absolutely ridiculous. I grew up in a town (and a time) that didn't have a skate park and I remember hearing about ones that did in far away places (like southern california) and was amazed. parks you didn't have to build yourself? towns that supported sports like that? pretty incredible.
now parks are so common that bikers feel that they deserve either their own or their own time in them. protests like the ones in that video are way more likely to close down skateparks, rather than build bmx parks. the hassle and liability is already huge, but throw a bike in there that has way more speed... just ain't going to happen.
I spent my whole summers building bike jumps in the woods near my house. this sense of entilement these bikers are showing not only misplaced but detrimental. kids today...
plus their legal arguments (freedom of assembly, etc) are completely out of context, inaccurate and got that 12 year old arrested. completely f-ed up.
Why not? if the skater and the inliners can use the parks why cant the bikers. The fact is, bikers tax money went to pay for the park just as much as the skaters tax oney did. i think its good that kids are getting out and excercising their right to freedom of speech when they see something that they dont think is right, thats what we do here in america. Whats rediculous is that the cops are aresting the people who are out of the house excercising. While all we see on tv is obese this and obesity that, how much sense does it make to arrest bikers. i also realize that these cops are only obeying orders, but just because the powers that be are against something, that doesnt make it right.webb said:now parks are so common that bikers feel that they deserve either their own or their own time in them.
they aren't just riding their bikes. they're riding their bikes in an environment designed for skateboards to perform aerial manuvers. bikes go faster, kids get bigger air, kids can get hurt more easily. more injuries increases the chance of the town getting sued for allowing kids to bike in skate park.DownhillnDunkey said:The point is, where are BMXers supposed to ride if they're not allowed to ride anywhere else.. They should have a place where it is LEGAL to ride and where they can be held responsible for their own injuries/actions.. I mean Kids getting arrested for riding their BIKES... BIKES.. riding their BIKKES!!!.... While they are bustin bikers, there are people either dying or gettin sold drugs.they dont expect their own park, they just want it so they can be there with everyone else.
I saw one, maybe two people protesting who were old enough to be tax payers, and even then they could have been in college. not that the skaters looked like they're working either, but the tax payers/elected officials decided a skate park was a good use of funds and a necessary risk. but I wrote about the tax issue before.escapeartist said:The fact is, bikers tax money went to pay for the park just as much as the skaters tax oney did.
yeah... probably pretty dumb. but I've been reading these forums for a while and I thought that this was worth commenting on. I'm not saying the kids are wrong, but I think that using the methods established for much more noble pursuits and the constitutional arguments are fairly misplaced.escapeartist said:By the way, its an interesting strategy to make your first post on a bike forum be about how bikers wanting to ride in a skatepark are wrong...
I dunno about that... in the parks ive ridden the skaters are going just as big as the riderswebb said:they aren't just riding their bikes. they're riding their bikes in an environment designed for skateboards to perform aerial manuvers. bikes go faster, kids get bigger air, kids can get hurt more easily. more injuries increases the chance of the town getting sued for allowing kids to bike in skate park.
it's as good of a first post as any i've seen . i agree with you btw.webb said:yeah... probably pretty dumb. but I've been reading these forums for a while and I thought that this was worth commenting on. I'm not saying the kids are wrong, but I think that using the methods established for much more noble pursuits and the constitutional arguments are fairly misplaced.
sure I guess. but I just think that a better way to go about it would have been going to a town meeting or building their own hits (I mean, the town's NAME is "mesa"... there's gotta be some room for a jump or two), then you wouldn't have a ten year old getting an arrest record. that's all. and I'm writing this thinking there's probably some kids reading these forums that might be in a similar situation... just remember, you guys might really, really want to be able to bike in a park, but it's not worth getting arrested for. AT ALL. save that for a much, much larger injustice.DownhillnDunkey said:webb you have some good points. but either way.. the whole point is. If they cant ride in streets or anything, Create a place where they can.. then chances of you getting hurt on a bike are equal to the chances on a skateboard, in fact i see more skateboard crash videos than bike crash videos.and im sure those kids buy their bikes. the bike price + tax... dont we all pay taxes?
bro, wut the f0ck is wrong with u. i dont kno how u could possibly say its ****ed up to fight for ur rights. that kid got arrested becuz he chose to ride into their. to take that farther step. that kid is probably ****in famous for that step. hes hardcore and i kno ur gonna sae something lame like. how can u think getting arrested is hardcore, but i dont giv a sh1t. that lil kid stood up to those cops and got everyone pumped up. maybe u dont appreciate riding, or fighting to ride becuz uve never rode a skatepark, or u suck. dont write sh1t talking about how dumb something is if everyone is talking about how hard core or cool something is and not expect people to say ur a vagina alright. go out and ride ur bike and stop bitching about people trying to gain biking rights.webb said:that's absolutely ridiculous. I grew up in a town (and a time) that didn't have a skate park and I remember hearing about ones that did in far away places (like southern california) and was amazed. parks you didn't have to build yourself? towns that supported sports like that? pretty incredible.
now parks are so common that bikers feel that they deserve either their own or their own time in them. protests like the ones in that video are way more likely to close down skateparks, rather than build bmx parks. the hassle and liability is already huge, but throw a bike in there that has way more speed... just ain't going to happen.
I spent my whole summers building bike jumps in the woods near my house. this sense of entilement these bikers are showing not only misplaced but detrimental. kids today...
plus their legal arguments (freedom of assembly, etc) are completely out of context, inaccurate and got that 12 year old arrested. completely f-ed up.
please grow up and learn how to write. his point was that there is no constitutional right to bmx-in-skateparks, and invoking irrelevant nonsense (b/c of its irrelevance) like the right to free assembly and generally making a spectacle is unlikely to advance the bikers' cause.aznfreerdr08 said:bro, wut the f0ck is wrong with u. i dont kno how u could possibly say its ****ed up to fight for ur rights. that kid got arrested becuz he chose to ride into their. to take that farther step. that kid is probably ****in famous for that step. hes hardcore and i kno ur gonna sae something lame like. how can u think getting arrested is hardcore, but i dont giv a sh1t. that lil kid stood up to those cops and got everyone pumped up. maybe u dont appreciate riding, or fighting to ride becuz uve never rode a skatepark, or u suck. dont write sh1t talking about how dumb something is if everyone is talking about how hard core or cool something is and not expect people to say ur a vagina alright. go out and ride ur bike and stop bitching about people trying to gain biking rights.
usually these parks are built because the skaters go to the city and say "please help us get a park, give us a place to go so we don't have to skate where you don't want us to skate"rigidhack said:<snip>
If the city is offering these spaces in order to mitigate crime, or delinquency, or whatever, then why do it by excluding a large section of the demographic they are trying to reach?</snip>
so your saying that a concrete in-the-ground bowl isnt set up to allow high speeds?pnj said:I didn't read all the posts, but I just wanted to say my part. sorry if it has been repeated.
there is more then one kind of skater as well as one kind of bmx/biker. you have kids that are just starting out and you have expert/pro's. an expert in either area can go extremly fast and high. skateboards don't have brakes. (I'm aware, many bmx kids ride with no brakes as well)
what keeps things sane, is riders from both groups understanding and respecting each other. understanding how a park flows and who is doing what at a given time. if you have 10 little kids that aren't aware of their surroundings (and your an expert/pro) you shouldn't be hauling ass across the park without letting the youngin's know you plan on hauling ass all over.
not all skateparks are set up to allow high speeds.
in parks that allow both bikes and skates, the attitude is on an even keel and the respect or at least understanding of each other is more apparent.
what it really comes down to is respect and communication. I find it somewhat bizzare that a group of either bikers or skaters won't simply ask another group or individual to move or to watch out while they hit a give section of the park. I see it all the time. or when they do ask, they do so with anger.
both groups can exist. and they will exist. in 50 or 100 years do you think we will be having this conversation? (asides from us being dead..)
I don't think so. city parks departments will set aside a give amount each year to go towards 'skateparks', or 'alternative sports parks' or whatever name they give them. and they will be enjoyed by the public. just as basketball courts, soccer fields, and other public parks are enjoyed by many different groups.
I have NO IDEA how you got that from my post.d-sop said:so your saying that a concrete in-the-ground bowl isnt set up to allow high speeds?
Well said.. well said...rigidhack said:Maybe I'm dating myself here, but does anybody else remember the whole "no snowboards allowed" at the ski resorts controversy?
I'm not buying the argument that "there's no constitutional right to ride BMX in a skatepark" line for at least a couple of reasons. First of all riding or not riding is not a constitutional issue. It is -obviously-a political one, but not a constitutional one. Also, there is nothing in the constitution about skateparks AT ALL.
If the city is offering these spaces in order to mitigate crime, or delinquency, or whatever, then why do it by excluding a large section of the demographic they are trying to reach? (Unless there is an assumption that only skaters would otherwise be causing trouble.)
Park riding is inherently risky, BMX, skate, blade, all of it. I thikn it would be a better use of city $ to take all the man-hours now put into chasing, arresting, obstructing 12 year old BMX riders and hire a couple of park attendants who can monitor things like helmet use, rider etiquette, privide immediate first aid and so on - just like lifeguards at a pool. That in itself would likely solve all kinds of problems and create a few jobs. Hell, incorporate the parks into the local rec system and offer training camps, summer programs, lessons. Better trained riders are generally safer riders if only because they are good enough to know the rules and their own limits.