Quantcast

sunday/dw link proper setup

Jordan Masse

Chimp
Nov 7, 2007
6
0
I tried searching for this topic and came up with nothing, so I apologize if this has been covered already.

I'm 190lbs and according the sunday spring weight chart I should be running a 400lbs spring so my question here is if I run a 350lbs spring for a softer ride will I be defeating some of the ride characteristics of the dw link.

for example I know the dw link is designed to sit at a certain point in its travle for optimum performance. is there a magic amount of sag?
 

S.K.C.

Turbo Monkey
Feb 28, 2005
4,096
25
Pa. / North Jersey
Those are general spring rates - not really set in stone in other words. I'd try a 350 lbs. spring to see how it feels. If you are blowing through travel too quickly or bottoming without hitting drops/jumps, even with Bottom-Out cranked all the way in, then I'd go up to a 400 lbs. spring

I weigh between 165 and 170 lbs. and a 350 feels just about right for me, if not a bit oversprung. The 300 lbs. spring I used to run was definitely too soft - bottomed out hard during race course useage.

...of course I don't have World Cup level bike handling skillz, so it also depends on how smooth you are.

:biggrin:

Depends on the shock you use too - I run a DHX 5.0 that is an OEM shock which already has the "light compression / light rebound tune" from the factory.

EDIT: Can't believe I forgot the most important bit of info - Check your Sag! You should be running at least 30% sag or about 1 inch.
 

dw

Wiffle Ball ninja
Sep 10, 2001
2,943
0
MV
Give the 350 a try and see what you think. It should feel pretty good. I weigh 170-175 with gear and run a 300. I wouldn't even think of running more.
 

Demomonkey

Monkey
Apr 27, 2005
857
0
Auckland New Zealand
Im 165# with kit and run at 350Ti spring. I found with the 300 (steel) the bike bogged down in the corners and pedaled poorly.

With the 350 the bike is much more lively and I don't bottom it out all the time like I used to. Its feels much more stable, just as plush and has instilled more confidence to bash the crap out of my rims.
 

Gelbwurstbrot

Monkey
Jul 31, 2004
186
10
Franken, Germany
I am at your weight and use a 400 # spring.
The 350 # did not feel comfortable to me also PUSH recommended me a 400 # spring.

The 400 # feels perfect but I still would like to have more bottom out resistence and I am not a hucker.
 

Santa Maria

Monkey
Aug 29, 2007
653
0
Austria
I am also around your weight. used a 350 this seaseon which was a little to soft for me. No I will switch to a 400 Ti - should be the perfect fit
 

Carnaza

Monkey
Aug 10, 2006
243
0
Santiago, Chile
i weight like 82 kilos (like 182 lbs) and i started using a 300 # and it was like ****... bottoming out very often, then i go to a 350 # and it was good... and after that i tried a 400# and i liked it much more than the 300# it bottoms out much less than the 350# and i don`t need to preload it (i needed 1 turn with the 350#)

try the 400# you don`t lose anything trying
 

Jordan Masse

Chimp
Nov 7, 2007
6
0
thanks for the replies guys

i just want to say bottoming out is not a big issue for me because I'm a race and I'm pretty soft on the landings. I'm more interested in traction and and the right amount of sag.
 

Gelbwurstbrot

Monkey
Jul 31, 2004
186
10
Franken, Germany
I am at your weight and use a 400 # spring.
The 350 # did not feel comfortable to me also PUSH recommended me a 400 # spring.

The 400 # feels perfect but I still would like to have more bottom out resistence and I am not a hucker.

Sorry I was wrong. I use a 350 # spring not a 400 #
With the 300 # spring I had allways the feeling to use too much travel at midsized hits.

Would be the DHX more progressive it might work.
May I try the 300 # spring again with increased air pressure in the air chamber. Approximately around 130-150 psi